Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, dieselfan1 said:

Call it what you want, it's still a half ton.


Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
 

Yeah, so?

Posted
13 hours ago, swathdiver said:

That is the Maximum Towing Package and in a previous generation, GMT900, came with the 6.2 motor, 3.73 gears and the increased capacity cooling system with an engine oil cooler and external transmission cooler.  It has an extra leaf in the rear spring pack bringing the rear axle rating from 3950 to 4200 pounds.  The K2s are similar though I do not know what gears they used.  Towing capacity is 10,400 to almost 11,000 pounds for the RWD models.  The K2s were rated even higher if memory serves.

any chance the MTP  has a larger radiator than our K2  trucks with 5.3 motors? I find the stock rad is a bit under performing when towing and at WOT not towing

Posted
4 hours ago, pokismoki said:

any chance the MTP  has a larger radiator than our K2  trucks with 5.3 motors? I find the stock rad is a bit under performing when towing and at WOT not towing

According to ACDelco's parts website, yes, the NHT has a different radiator.  It is 21907 versus 21927.  I selected a 2017 with the 6.2 of course.  Don't see dimensions listed there like they have for mine, maybe Rock Auto has them.

 

https://parts-catalog.acdelco.com/catalog/catalog_search.php

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Towing at the limit half a dozen times a year will  never justify the added cost of upgrading trucks. Especially when its an otherwise daily driver.

 

If the limit is 10000 lbs, the limit is 10000 lbs, I'm not going to stop at 5000 lbs to make a bunch of worry warts feel warm and fuzzy.

 

If everything is set up correctly, the weight is distributed correctly, brakes are working sway is minimal... go for it.

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, pokismoki said:

whats the part number for the larger radiator that drops into our 1500 trucks?

You have a K2 right?  If so, it is 21907.

Posted

My 2018 Silverado has the same setup as the OP, and one occasion I've towed at the limit (tractor + float).   

 

Braking was fine, as was handling at speeds below 50mph.  Above 50mph however felt a little squirrely... not something I'd want to do for hours on end.    Especially not with a boxy trailer that catches a lot of sidewind.   7,000 to 8,000 lb is probably the 'comfort limit' for long-distance hauling. 

Posted
On 4/6/2021 at 10:56 AM, don67 said:

My 2018 Silverado has the same setup as the OP, and one occasion I've towed at the limit (tractor + float).   

 

Braking was fine, as was handling at speeds below 50mph.  Above 50mph however felt a little squirrely... not something I'd want to do for hours on end.    Especially not with a boxy trailer that catches a lot of sidewind.   7,000 to 8,000 lb is probably the 'comfort limit' for long-distance hauling. 

Was that with a weight distribution hitch or without?

Posted
17 minutes ago, don67 said:

Without

Ok, makes sense.  Your generation truck requires a weight distribution hitch for loads over 7,000 pounds and is optional below that.

Posted (edited)
On 4/2/2021 at 12:37 PM, asilverblazer said:

Towing at the limit half a dozen times a year will  never justify the added cost of upgrading trucks. Especially when its an otherwise daily driver.

 

If the limit is 10000 lbs, the limit is 10000 lbs, I'm not going to stop at 5000 lbs to make a bunch of worry warts feel warm and fuzzy.

 

If everything is set up correctly, the weight is distributed correctly, brakes are working sway is minimal... go for it.

I can only assume this comment is indirectly directed towards me since I'm the only one that mentioned the divide by half rule; so here comes the information to fill in your ignorance:

 

Tow rating is determined by the following (J2807 Specification):

-0-30 mph in 12 seconds

-0-60 mph in 30 seconds

-40-60 mph in 18 seconds

-must be able to brake from 20 mph to zero in 45 feet with trailer brakes, or 80 feet without.

-needs to be able to maintain understeer as it accelerates on a circular skid pad from 0.1 g to 0.3 g of lateral acceleration.

-needs be able to tow its maximum trailer weight up a specific 11.4-mile uphill stretch of road in Arizona. For this test to be run correctly, it must be at least 100 degrees Fahrenheit outside, and the air conditioning must be on its maximum setting using outside air. The truck must maintain a minimum speed of 40 mph, and it can't throw any error codes or burn any fluids during the test. Grade of test is between 3-7% on the David Dam test.

 

None of this testing really covers real world testing with long distance or long duration travel. The most stressful test only lasts 15.2 minutes (11.4/45=0.2533). What makes this even worse is the Vehicle Warm-up is Optional or not specified in the test. 

 

So now that we have established a baseline we can see that tow limit specification doesn't specifically cover pushing the truck to its limits in all situations. Multiple people have already stated (including myself) the truck CAN NOT successfully tow extended distances at max tow rating without doing damage. Its already an established fact the TCC is weak in the K2 and is ran too hot to begin with. $300 tranny cooler vs $3000-5000 transmission rebuild because you decided to tow your daily driver a couple times a year at the limit; I know which one I'd pick. Sometimes it pays to be a worry wart and feel warm and fuzzy, but that is just me.

 

J2807 specification can be found here for further reading:

https://fifthwheelst.com/documents/tow-test-standards-2016-02.pdf

Edited by ic3man5
  • Like 1
Posted

Hummm. A truck can’t tow at maximum limits for extended times without breaking down. I did for 20 years with multiple vehicles for a minimum of 100K miles each. My half tons had max payload from brand new until trade in. My trailers were capable of stopping their load and the truck. Diesels were the primary workhorses. The early gassers were 390s,454s, a couple V-10s. Honestly they all were over max limits. Of course that was until the mid 2000s. Payload and tow loads have increased. I would have been within the new ratings.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
11 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Hummm. A truck can’t tow at maximum limits for extended times without breaking down. I did for 20 years with multiple vehicles for a minimum of 100K miles each. My half tons had max payload from brand new until trade in. My trailers were capable of stopping their load and the truck. Diesels were the primary workhorses. The early gassers were 390s,454s, a couple V-10s. Honestly the all were over max limits. Of course that was until the mid 2000s. Payload and tow loads have increased. I would have been within the new ratings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Those trucks weren't at the thermal limits and were essentially built better out of mechanical tolerances and limitations. Your truck 20 years ago more than likely had over 100hp/torque less power, bigger block, lighter, worse brakes, etc. I wouldn't say that is a fair comparison as I used to do the same without issue; now with the EPA and push for efficacy we are reaching more limits in the designs. I've seen my fair share of 4L60s be destroyed because of towing.

 

Posted
 
Those trucks weren't at the thermal limits and were essentially built better out of mechanical tolerances and limitations. Your truck 20 years ago more than likely had over 100hp/torque less power, bigger block, lighter, worse brakes, etc. I wouldn't say that is a fair comparison as I used to do the same without issue; now with the EPA and push for efficacy we are reaching more limits in the designs. I've seen my fair share of 4L60s be destroyed because of towing.
 

My shop see examples of heavy towing daily. Non of my trucks were stock. 0195e6033da8110ef4209a0f2d478081.jpg
I just stopped towing in the mid 2000s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was the GM of a Lincoln Mercury dealership back in the 80's. The service lot was always full with "broken" ones. Plenty of transmissions, power windows and a/c repairs. The only one I'd consider owning would be the Marauder at this point and it certainly wouldn't be a daily driver.  My 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate is my "Lincoln Town Car" in my retirement. I want all the "stuff". Big infotainment screens, one touch power windows, Supercruise (I won't buy another vehicle without it), hands free pretty much everything. I'm going to swap my current truck for a 2027 Yukon Denali Ultimate so I can have the air suspension and surround vision recording along with all the other "stuff". 
    • Yep mine is on backorder also.
    • The Denali Ultimate's grille is tinted, but the "regular' Denali has a bright chrome grille like the current models.
    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...