Jump to content

2020 GMC / Chevy Dependability?

Waylon78
 Share

Recommended Posts

Waylon78 Enthusiast

Waylon78

Posted
Posted

So I bought a new Chevy Z71 in 2004. It ended up being one of the best trucks I have ever owned. Last month it turned 380k miles. Original engine and I didn't replace the transmission until around 360k miles. The truck was unbelievable. I sold it just last week and bought a new GMC X31. So far I love the new truck. Really hated to sell it but it was time. The family needed something a little bigger for trips (Z71 was an extended cab, new GMC is crew cab) and it was just time after 17 years. 

 

Here is my question. Do you guys think these new trucks can last as long as the old GM trucks? All this new technology is worrisome to me. I am not one to trade vehicles all the time because financially it just doesn't make sense to me. Would love to hear from some of you that are racking up miles on the 2019 models and up that are having success. I keep reading about a bunch of problems..... Give me some hope!

RPaul Enthusiast

RPaul

Posted
Posted (edited)

Im at 30k miles so far and just minor issues. Sometimes power steps stay open, have had occasional issues with window switches or sensor possibly. Those are real dumb issues if you ask me.

 

Really worried about the lifter failures Ive seen mentioned a few times. I pray to god they are not as common as it seems, as the last job I want to begin is a lifter/cam replacement.... best thing you can do nowadays is figure out basics on fixing your own vehicle. Most fixes are pretty easy(once out of warranty) and Youtube is actually a pretty good resource. Sometimes just throwing parts at a problem can be cheaper than dealer work. Sometimes it ends up being more expensive to throw parts at a problem, rather than a real mechanic fixing first time.If you have a basic set of tools, simple issues like plugs, coil packs, alternator, etc are real easy things to work on. Just get a code reader...

 

Truck has been flawless though.

Edited by RPaul
ericarenee Enthusiast

ericarenee

Posted
Posted

I have a 2020 Bought back in  Aug of last year.  But  i only have  3700 miles on it . I  Still Driving my  04 and will run it until it totally dies. I can only hope this truck will last  half as long as the 04 EXPRESS  3500 HD  has and still in great shape. Its a TANK . 

 

Many people come on here when they have issues about there truck , You rarely see the higher mileage happy owners. They do not think about forums or talking about something that just never lets them down...

 

I think the trucks are reliable and will last.. No they are not built as well any a o3 o4  truck..   

 

Good Luck .

gregus73 Enthusiast

gregus73

Posted
Posted (edited)

My 2020 already has over 10,000 miles on it. One small issue but was fixed with a firmware update. Occasional slowness in getting to the navigation, and slowness in loading the profile. Other than that was been working flawlessly so far. No concerning issues yet. Have had more issues on my wife’s Lexus with 8000 miles.

Edited by gregus73
Colossus Senior Enthusiast

Colossus

Posted
Posted

Those were some of the best years of GM Trucks... the GMT-800 platform.  Not perfect, but an awesome fairly reliable power train.  (the 5.7L from the previous gen too) Do I think these trucks can last as long?  Maybe, but don't have as good of a feeling about them.  So much crap on them now to meet tight emissions standards and to squeeze every bit of fuel economy out of them that they can.. Which means the more things that can go wrong.  Actions taken to reduce weight and cost of build, because the materials for the cost of build has gone up along with inflation and all that other stuff. 

There is a reason behind why Crapota doesn't have the best fuel economy in their trucks- they hang onto their power train a lot longer than most other manufacturers.  It gives them time to work bugs out, and then to reap the reliability and longevity awards that come with that.  And it works.  The first 2-3 years of their new design are plagued with reliability issues just like any other manufacturer but then they go another 5-8 years before major refresh or upgrade vs another 3-4 years like the big three are doing now, continuing to try to one up each other.  They may not sell as many units as Ford, GM, and Dodge, but they sell enough to remain profitable and build a good return customer base and new customer base from those fed up with all the issues that the big three suffer.  

mcgee500 Enthusiast

mcgee500

Posted
Posted

I have had my 2020 Chevy Silverado Z71- LTZ a year now. This truck is miles ahead of my 2018 a truck I truly hated. I have had no problems at all and I have just over 16000 miles so far. This truck is every thing that I every wanted in my truck. I'm retired and when we go it's always in the truck. First thing I did was change the stock wheels and tires. I went with BF Goodrich K02 285/65/18 and KTM wheels.biglefttru6.thumb.PNG.78d27126e18c75c7a1a5432325150831.PNG

Gangly Senior Enthusiast

Gangly

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have a 2020 5.3 Z71 with over 30K miles and the only issue I have had is a bad battery from the factory which was corrected in the first 2 weeks of ownership.  The truck has been flawless otherwise and I have been pleasantly surprised with its durability.  The rear seat rattles slightly over substantial bumps, but otherwise there isn't a squeak or rattle anywhere in the suspension, drivetrain, or trim.  The 5.3 and 6.2's are known bulletproof engines, the long term affects of DFM are the only unknowns on the platform but I hope GM has learned lessons from the AFM systems and corrected accordingly.

Edited by Gangly
SteveCZ Enthusiast

SteveCZ

Posted
Posted

A small batch of issues with the 10 speed tranny.  I was one of them.  1900 miles, 3rd gear shift solenoid in the valve body crapped out.  Replaced under warranty, been fine since (15k now).  

 

The talk about the failed lifters begs me to ask the question, is normal maintenance performed on these trucks, and is the proper oil used when maintenance is required?  The reason I ask, first, is I don't know, and secondly, I had a 5.3 with AFM (2014), with 110k on the motor.  I changed the oil when it told me, with a DEXOS approved oil, in the proper weight (not naming brands, it shouldn't matter), and that motor was flawless.  The ONLY problem I had with it was a few of the exhaust manifold bolts let go, so I had a leak.  I got that fixed and all was good.

Mandalorian Enthusiast

Mandalorian

Posted
Posted

These are some of the most mass produced vehicles on the planet, there are going to be some quality issues here and there. You'll hear about them more, especially at places like this just due to the sheer scale of sales. However, a 2020 or 2021 truck should be very reliable and last a very long time as long as you follow the maintenance schedule. The most serious issues tend to come in the first model year of a new generation, which you don't have.

  • Like 1
RPaul Enthusiast

RPaul

Posted
Posted

Forgot to mention, not necessarily reliability related, but have never had a vehicle with such crappy paint on front end. Have never seen so many paint chips so quickly, front end is completely covered. Truck is ceramic coated and other paint looks great, just seems to be real thin, or possibly the material on front end is more delicate (plastic)

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
Forgot to mention, not necessarily reliability related, but have never had a vehicle with such crappy paint on front end. Have never seen so many paint chips so quickly, front end is completely covered. Truck is ceramic coated and other paint looks great, just seems to be real thin, or possibly the material on front end is more delicate (plastic)
Several years ago GM changed to a different paint that is thinner and chips more easily. My wife's 2017 Traverse is atrocious, but that doesn't affect reliability.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

winks79 Enthusiast

winks79

Posted
Posted (edited)

The trucks are good trucks. Is this 5.3 as good as the 2006 and back non AFM/DFM? Doubtful. But this is what we have now from GM. I have no doubt that the engines will outlast the rest of the truck. I'll take my chances as GM has served me well for 35 years of driving. It is a much better driving and handling truck than the previous generations, as long as you get rid of the crappy Rancho shocks. That is really my only complaint, but Bilstein's cured that, so I'm very happy! 

The answer to your question is YES!

Edited by winks79
dane0254 Enthusiast

dane0254

Posted
Posted

I have a 2020 Trailboss with 16k on it, so far it has been flawless. I love the truck and hope that it'll last me for a long time. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 473 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...