Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi All,

 

I’m new here and I love all the information in the forums. 
 

I recently purchased a new 2021 Denali with 6.2L that had factory installed cat back exhaust installed. I noticed a loud chirping noise on cold start-up, while in park with low revs 1000-1100 rpm and then goes away and finally when coming to a stop when the transmission second to first gear. 
 

I have brought it to the dealer and they can’t figure out what the noise is and have taken the exhaust apart reinstalled with new gaskets and the chirp is still there. 
 

I don’t know if it is a back pressure issue or the performance exhaust itself.
 

I have attached a picture of the tag on the muffler to see if anyone knows who manufactures the exhaust system (borla or corsa) and if anyone has experience the same chirping noise. 
 

thanks in advance. 
 

Peter

10B18563-EC6F-4EAA-AEA4-62E8074F3B15.jpeg

Edited by Pbrad074
  • Pbrad074 changed the title to 2021 Sierra Denali 6.2L Engine or Exhaust Chirp Noise
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

You sure that chirp isn't coming from the front of the engine?  A lot of people, including myself, have that annoying chirp/squeak coming from the front of the engine.  I have a 2020 Chevy RST w/ 6.2 and it chirps pretty much every startup after sitting even for a little bit then goes away

Posted

Update:

 

With much negotiation, I’m bringing the truck back to the dealer this week to have the muffler replaced. 
 

I will report back once installed. 

Posted

From what I can see the noise is not coming from the exhaust it's coming from the engine on mine. And just added information it had a Gibson muffler on it when I bought it and was making the noise and I installed the muffler delete 2 days ago and the noise still exists.

Posted

Thanks for the update - I guess the muffler replacement won’t help me then…. I will keep looking. 

 

My truck will also chirp coming to a stop when the trans down shifts from 2nd to 1st. Are you able to reproduce the chirp at low rev up, 800-900rpm in park?

Posted

My me maybe be different...it's more of an idling issue. Obviously more apparent in the garage. I'll try spraying the serpentine belt. I'm guessing that may help.

Posted

My new 21 Silverado 6.2 has the same problem. I noticed it the next day after I bought it. Started it in the garage to go to work the next morning. Chirpy chirp chirp. Sounds like serpentine belt chirp. It doesn't go away until it's completely warmed up but I swear I can hear it all the time after the first time I heard it especially at light throttle when it feels like its misfiring from the cylinder deactivation. Sounds like its coming from the left side of the engine to me. I do not think its belt noise. I watched a bunch of exhaust videos on YouTube (because I'm debating what catback I want) and I heard the same noise in a bunch of them. I read somewhere that it may be the lifters due to the cylinder deactivation. I'm just going to deal with it until it bends a pushrod. its under warranty 👍

Posted

This has been talked about / debated on here in many threads.  Its the DFM on the 6.2 engines.  Trying putting yours in L9 and drive around (this turns off DFM).  You wont hear the noise anymore.  There is no fix that I know of except for purchasing the Pulsar LT module for $500 to shut off DFM.

Posted
1 hour ago, Pbrad074 said:

Thanks for the update - And pardon my ignorance, but what is L9?

 

 

Put the trans in low, and manually click the (+) on the shifter until it’s in “L9” (indicated on the DIC). It will shift normally and automatically, but 10th gear will be locked out and and DFM will not be active in any gear.
 

Probably a moot point because DFM is not active at idle / in park. I’ve read some things suggesting it’s the cat and that makes sense because mine doesn’t squeak once warmed up. Nothing to really worry about.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I have the exact same issue on my 2021 Denali 6.2L.  I do not have the performance exhaust option.  Dealer first told me it was the butterflies in the exhaust and that it was normal.  I then installed a Magnaflow exhaust that eliminates them. Still makes the noise.  Brought it back to the dealer, and they said they drove another truck and it makes the same noise so it's normal, but couldn't tell me what it was.  I called GM customer service, and have been going back and forth with them for almost 3 months. They finally told me to make an appointment with the service manager to drive a similar, new, vehicle and see if it makes the noise.  3 weeks of trying to get in touch with the service manager and still no calls back.  The noise is really annoying. 

Posted

Quick follow up.  I just tried the L9 mode and confirmed that it stops the noise while driving (decel).  Of course this doesn't help on cold start while in Park.  Can anyone confirm if the Pulsar LT (DFM deactivation) will help at start up?  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...