Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a new 2022 Sierra SLT Limited that I'm gradually working through the fit and finish issues on. Unfortunately I am very good at finding defects on everything as it relates heavily to what I do for work in a manufacturing/ purchasing capacity.  For instance, I did a warranty claim on my 4Runner because I found a slight streak on the antireflective coating on the inside of one of the headlight lenses. I can find something wrong with everything and it pretty much drives me crazy.

 

This brings me to the question on what is a realistic expectation for fit/finish on a GM truck these days? 

 

My concern is that the driver side fender to upper front bumper joint (where the plastic clips into the bracket attached to the aluminum fender). The fender overhangs the bumper piece by 1.9mm the full width of the joint (8" or so) based on stacking some feeler gauges I have . The truck is white so when I'm in my garage with direct overhead lighting it is noticeable due to the shadow. Outside and from more than 2ft away a normal person will never notice it. 

 

I was looking for a spec on this and funny enough found the body panel alignment tolerances from Ford for a 2015 F150 that has a very similar joint between fender and bumper. That specifies a flushness specification of .8mm +/- 1.5mm. So, funny enough the truck would be in spec if it was a Ford. The passenger side alignment is perfect and the body gaps honestly look really good on the rest of the truck. 

 

Looking at the method of assembly, the bumper guide (23388662) indexes square pin holes in the metal fender flange at two places and it has two circular (not oblong) holes with screws that hold the clip tight to the flange.  The plastic bumper then snaps in (I did confirm that the bumper on mine is seated appropriately/ not over inserted). There is no adjustment in this joint as the bumper can only clip in one way and the clip can only index on the fender in one way. The only way you're fixing it is by putting another fender on the truck where the holes are 2MM farther outboard or if GM has different versions of the bumper guide with alternate offsets. 

 

So my question is, does a normal person just ignore this and move on with life or annoy a dealer until they agree to fix it? Then, if they do fix it, is the issue of having a new fender painted and installed on a new truck enough of a detractor that it isn't worth it? 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, WisconsinTruck said:

So my question is, does a normal person just ignore this and move on with life or annoy a dealer until they agree to fix it? Then, if they do fix it, is the issue of having a new fender painted and installed on a new truck enough of a detractor that it isn't worth it? 

 

Yes, a normal person just moves on with life because if these small things worry you or annoy you so much you will never ever ever be happy. Nothing is perfect and you'll just have to accept that.

 

I don't mean to sound harsh but you'd be the worst type of customer to deal with. Something would always be a problem. I don't know you obviously and I'm sure you're a decent guy but those type of things get talked about a lot when the customer isn't in ear shot.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

Yes, a normal person just moves on with life because if these small things worry you or annoy you so much you will never ever ever be happy. Nothing is perfect and you'll just have to accept that.

 

I don't mean to sound harsh but you'd be the worst type of customer to deal with. Something would always be a problem. I don't know you obviously and I'm sure you're a decent guy but those type of things get talked about a lot when the customer isn't in ear shot.

That is probably a fair point. I think that it is all a balance at the end of the day and that is why the title is asking about what is a realistic expectation.

 

If a lot of others find the same little things here and there it makes me more accepting because it is with a factory specification more than likely. I'm more concerned about if a given characteristic would meet an engineering specification because that means it is "right" and you're ultimately getting what the manufacturer promised. 

 

I think the key with any manufactured product is that while everything is built within a tolerance you want to be as close to nominal as possible. Cheaper products are more likely to be on the fringes of a given tolerance and when the price goes up you get closer and closer to nominal as production controls get tighter. 

 

Given how much trucks cost these days (even when factoring in changes in wages and inflation) I think it is fair to have a high expectation within reason. 

 

Posted (edited)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_Bearing_(advertisement)

 

We've gone from that 1992 bearing test to slowly boiling the frog until he didn't notice that this sort of quality is no longer a "thing", common, even expected. Sad what we accept, for as much as we pay for a thing. Consumers have literally given away their economic vote. Do they even teach this in high school anymore?  

 

Now you are considered 'petty' and "tedious" for demanding such refinement from something that cost as much as your home and something you are EXPECTED to pay every few years. I could care less what the mechanic at the dealer thinks. 

 

OMG if you built it like that NO ONE could afford it!

Problem is, it WAS built like that and EVERYONE could afford it. 

 

I was literally told "orange peel' was unavoidable in a production paint job after witnessing it's absence in decades of factory finishes. I hate it when people tell me I didn't see what I saw and worse? Not seeing what I'm looking at. 

 

Here's the OP's problem. He hasn't got one. But as the public has been convinced to give away their economic votes he hasn't any LEVERAGE and will be literally spitting into the wind. 

 

:rant:

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

 I have the same truck as you and my mind works similarly.  I have noticed a few things like that on mine, as well.  It irritates me when washing it, but my mindset is if I were to have something like that fixed, they may fix that but make something else worse- I’d rather have a gap here or there from factory vs someone taking the thing apart and doing a less than good job putting it back together

 

I wish that wasn’t the case on a vehicle this expensive, but nothing is perfect.  I have gotten past it and have been enjoying the truck just the same

 

 

Posted (edited)

Personally if its not easy for me to fix at home I let it pass, End of the day it is going to get used/driven  and will get other chips, dings, or scratches no matter how well you take care of it.

Edited by WeGone
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WisconsinTruck said:

I have a new 2022 Sierra SLT Limited that I'm gradually working through the fit and finish issues on. Unfortunately I am very good at finding defects on everything as it relates heavily to what I do for work in a manufacturing/ purchasing capacity.  For instance, I did a warranty claim on my 4Runner because I found a slight streak on the antireflective coating on the inside of one of the headlight lenses. I can find something wrong with everything and it pretty much drives me crazy.

 

This brings me to the question on what is a realistic expectation for fit/finish on a GM truck these days? 

 

My concern is that the driver side fender to upper front bumper joint (where the plastic clips into the bracket attached to the aluminum fender). The fender overhangs the bumper piece by 1.9mm the full width of the joint (8" or so) based on stacking some feeler gauges I have . The truck is white so when I'm in my garage with direct overhead lighting it is noticeable due to the shadow. Outside and from more than 2ft away a normal person will never notice it. 

 

I was looking for a spec on this and funny enough found the body panel alignment tolerances from Ford for a 2015 F150 that has a very similar joint between fender and bumper. That specifies a flushness specification of .8mm +/- 1.5mm. So, funny enough the truck would be in spec if it was a Ford. The passenger side alignment is perfect and the body gaps honestly look really good on the rest of the truck. 

 

Looking at the method of assembly, the bumper guide (23388662) indexes square pin holes in the metal fender flange at two places and it has two circular (not oblong) holes with screws that hold the clip tight to the flange.  The plastic bumper then snaps in (I did confirm that the bumper on mine is seated appropriately/ not over inserted). There is no adjustment in this joint as the bumper can only clip in one way and the clip can only index on the fender in one way. The only way you're fixing it is by putting another fender on the truck where the holes are 2MM farther outboard or if GM has different versions of the bumper guide with alternate offsets. 

 

So my question is, does a normal person just ignore this and move on with life or annoy a dealer until they agree to fix it? Then, if they do fix it, is the issue of having a new fender painted and installed on a new truck enough of a detractor that it isn't worth it? 

 

Do what YOU want to do. It your truck. Don’t feel guilty about being YOU! 
When I flew jets for a living finding problems before it was a serious emergency in flight was my job so I get your industrial training. 
There are no perfect machines but heck its your machine. Make yourself as satisfied as you can within reason and enjoy your attention to detail and a better truck. We are customers and owners of great trucks that get better with critical review. 
Do it before you are blind deaf and nerve endings worn out like us oldies. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Matt G, WeGone, customboss - Exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for, much appreciated. 

 

Grumpy Boss - I got a good chuckle out of that 😆

Edited by WisconsinTruck
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Unfortunately, its not just GM with minor issues like fit and finish. I've owned trucks and cars from several manufacturers. Quality has definitely gotten progressively worse over the years over all brands. 

  • Like 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, WisconsinTruck said:

Matt G, WeGone, customboss - Exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for, much appreciated. 

 

Grumpy Boss - I got a good chuckle out of that 😆

 

I like to amuse and educate. 😉 

In the end as has been said. YOU own it. Be happy, don't worry.

 

My current truck has been near flawless in operation but it does have some of the worst paint I've even seen on anything including a shovel. But...I did the best I could with it. Over 150K and still looks like this. So much for it WILL get beat up. Maybe. Okay...fix it. Even this old fart can. 

 

IMG_0253.JPG.249353198ed5bf0315ed3b52e7b758c4.JPG

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_Bearing_(advertisement)

 

We've gone from that 1992 bearing test to slowly boiling the frog until he didn't notice that this sort of quality is no longer a "thing", common, even expected. Sad what we accept, for as much as we pay for a thing. Consumers have literally given away their economic vote. Do they even teach this in high school anymore?  

 

Now you are considered 'petty' and "tedious" for demanding such refinement from something that cost as much as your home and something you are EXPECTED to pay every few years. I could care less what the mechanic at the dealer thinks. 

 

OMG if you built it like that NO ONE could afford it!

Problem is, it WAS built like that and EVERYONE could afford it. 

 

I was literally told "orange peel' was unavoidable in a production paint job after witnessing it's absence in decades of factory finishes. I hate it when people tell me I didn't see what I saw and worse? Not seeing what I'm looking at. 

 

Here's the OP's problem. He hasn't got one. But as the public has been convinced to give away their economic votes he hasn't any LEVERAGE and will be literally spitting into the wind. 

 

:rant:

If I have said it once Ive said it 100 times, most seem to accept mediocrity. Its sad when we use to demand such quality in the things we worked hard to obtain to now accept "its ok." On top of that, instead of keeping things for 10 years, a lot are suckered into buying that small upgrade and repeating the purchase year after year. If everyone voted with their wallets, maybe companies would listen.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Byrds8 said:

If I have said it once Ive said it 100 times, most seem to accept mediocrity. Its sad when we use to demand such quality in the things we worked hard to obtain to now accept "its ok." On top of that, instead of keeping things for 10 years, a lot are suckered into buying that small upgrade and repeating the purchase year after year. If everyone voted with their wallets, maybe companies would listen.

 

Are you old enough to remember when the ability to rebuild a motor was a requirement to obtain your "Man Card"?

Even my mother had a Man Card

:crackup:

 

The M&M Mars Candy people will now flock on this post.

:wtf:

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

I was born at the end of that era. My Dad always tried to get me out there to learn but I had no interest. Looking back, I wish I had. I will be turning 50 this year and miss the good ole days of less technology. Things were less complicated back then.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 381 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...