Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have had this debate more than once. I say NO.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

A strong no from me.

 

And in case anyone has to chime in about this part, it's safe to assume we are talking about bigger business and corporations and not your small business guy with much less employees and aren't making millions a year with absurd stock options and bonus's.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I have the same opinion as with sports stars. Contracts that adjust with performance. Usually the pay is for past performance and earned. Two year contacts with options based on performance. No big contact buyouts either. You don’t perform you go. Let’s talk teachers and tenure, oh hell never mind.

  • Like 2
Posted

In a free market companies should pay their executives whatever they want to pay them. 

 

US workers who right now are the actual taxpayers ( most large US corporations essentially pay $0 in US income taxes) shouldn’t subsidize through the tax laws any pay over a million bucks like they currently do.  

 

Once again voting matters because US citizens have voted the tax laws into place that benefit large corporations to the point we call them citizens.......entitled citizens who don't pay their way. 

 

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

Posted

Most companies buy goods and services that are write offs. Some expand. All increase demands for more workers and payroll taxes. But let’s just pay more taxes instead. We all know the government is more efficient than business owners are.🥱

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, KARNUT said:

Most companies buy goods and services that are write offs. Some expand. All increase demands for more workers and payroll taxes. But let’s just pay more taxes instead. We all know the government is more efficient than business owners are.🥱

Why not just have the corporations and uber rich pay their fair share?  Because of the mindset you shared.

 

Overpaying corporate CEO's is a form of power and financial disparity that will  is ruining  this country. 

 

More Than 50 Major U.S. Corporations—Including Nike And FedEx—Paid No Federal Taxes Last Year

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2021/04/02/more-than-50-major-us-corporations-including-nike-and-fedex-paid-no-federal-taxes-last-year/?sh=4dd2085021d3

Posted

I’ll never assume I know how to fight as service person. I have no knowledge. I was a business owner for many years. I didn’t pay much in income taxes. I did pay my fair share in taxes. Just ask any business owner instead of posting anti business propaganda. Ok back in the box.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I’ll never assume I know how to fight as service person. I have no knowledge. I was a business owner for many years. I didn’t pay much in income taxes. I did pay my fair share in taxes. Just ask any business owner instead of posting anti business propaganda. Ok back in the box.

Fair enough.  I was in military 9.5 years.  I even paid taxes then.  

 

I owned and operated a successful business for 42 years. I paid my fair share of taxes. 

 

I know you did too.  

 

Here's the rub.......you weren't a CEO of a fortune 500 company. We are talking billions in lost income taxes that the little guys are paying. 

 

I am not arguing for more taxes or gov vs business arguments to confuse anyone like you are doing.  You think that your smaller business was  a player like a major fortune 500 Corporate CEO? 

 

Read the Forbes article and grasp that this is basic fairness not left right or gov vs biz.  In 2020 8.5 BILLION in taxes went unpaid because of the misunderstanding you are articulating.  

 

I RESPECT your business acumen and success.  I don't respect a select few rich pulling down millions and then paying nothing on the income. 

 

Mom and Pop pay, the worker bees pay, everyone should contribute something or why have a nation?  

 

 

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, customboss said:

Fair enough.  I was in military 9.5 years.  I even paid taxes then.  

 

I owned and operated a successful business for 42 years. I paid my fair share of taxes. 

 

I know you did too.  

 

Here's the rub.......you weren't a CEO of a fortune 500 company. We are talking billions in lost income taxes that the little guys are paying. 

 

I am not arguing for more taxes or gov vs business arguments to confuse anyone like you are doing.  You think that your smaller business was  a player like a major fortune 500 Corporate CEO? 

 

Read the Forbes article and grasp that this is basic fairness not left right or gov vs biz.  In 2020 8.5 BILLION in taxes went unpaid because of the misunderstanding you are articulating.  

 

I RESPECT your business acumen and success.  I don't respect a select few rich pulling down millions and then paying nothing on the income. 

 

Mom and Pop pay, the worker bees pay, everyone should contribute something or why have a nation?  

 

 

 

 

Ok last time. This is a big box and I have some knowledge. There’s lots of moving parts. Many people invest in these companies, 401s, IRAs and such. The bottom line effects those investments. Those companies are not owned by one person. There’s nothing more American than a share holding company. It involves many people. Paying ( their fair share) impacts many people. I as a retired person like many would be impacted like many millions. So let us keep the money instead of the government. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Ok last time. This is a big box and I have some knowledge. There’s lots of moving parts. Many people invest in these companies, 401s, IRAs and such. The bottom line effects those investments. Those companies are not owned by one person. There’s nothing more American than a share holding company. It involves many people. Paying ( their fair share) impacts many people. I as a retired person like many would be impacted like many millions. So let us keep the money instead of the government. 

I hear you and bought into that idea for years........., problem is the UBER rich are getting over on the general citizen or small business taxpayer.  BALANCE OF POWER is critical to working well. We are out of balance.  

 

If Citizens united allows corporations to act like individual citizens then for heck sake they ought to pay taxes too. 

 

We disagree.  If someone makes money they ought to pay something for the general good. 

 

I am retired too. I get it.  Poor and working class are getting screwed while investment class is getting over.  Thats out of balance and sooner than later CEO's and ultra uber rich either pay or get lynched. 

 

Or we could be Russian Federation and allow Oligarchs run us into the ground while voting ourselves into slavery.   Thats where we are headed. 

 

CEO pay is another canary in the coalmine issue that reflects this problem. 

 

Uber rich BORROW against wealth and never pay taxes on that and roll the dough until they pass it along to the kids. Poor working folks can't do that and keep getting behind.  Its not a plausible long term plan for a Republic to survive. 

 

 

Posted

I remember Warren Buffet saying his secretary paid more in taxes than his company, Berkshire Hathaway. He admitted something's wrong.

While I respect all opinions the threads here prove how people see things so differently, thus one of the biggest reasons we are where we are. Getting people on the same page to fix a problem is damn near impossible. Our government is the best example of that. 

If you want to go down the taxes rabbit hole, everyone should pay their share. Simple. 

Ramble on.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Black02Silverado said:

Fair Share Tax?. 

Here we go.

  • Haha 2
Posted

Be warned. If this ****** gets out of hand, vacations will be handed out.   :)

 

  • Haha 2
Posted

Unfortunately, executive pay at large corporations also drives the pay of government employees and civic leaders who use these figures to justify handing out more cash to their officers and directors, even charitable organizations use it to justify their director and officer numbers. Public service executives also use it.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...