Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ive got a 15 Sierra with the 6.2.  I did the AFM/VVT/DOD delete with a kit from Brian Tooley Racing and the kit come with the L83 cam.  Im curius if this was a mistake or does the L83 5.3L cam produce more torque for the bigger engine?  

Posted (edited)

From the btr website when looking at the kit you got

“THIS CAM IS NOT DESIGNED FOR A 6.2L  - THIS IS THE CORRECT CAM FOR THE 6.2L”

 

lol

Edited by truckguy82
Posted

The 6.2 camshaft just has different specs because of the size of the engine. The L83 camshaft can be used but it's likely to produce less power.

 

So it is a step backwards.

Posted

I'm not sure about BTR but with TExas speed they just spec a higher stage 5.3 cam for the 6.2.

 

On my truck when I called them to talk about the stage one 6.2 cam.  They told me it was to big of a cam for a truck with a stock stall.  So they had me buy there stage 2 L83 cam.  It's a 218/226 .635 .635 112 lsa

 

It's pulls hard.

 

What size is the L83 BTR cam?

Posted (edited)

off topic but , i think another forum member back in the day found that it was either the lt4  or lt5 that had the most valve lift and still retained the V4 function not that you want to save gas while making power

Edited by pokismoki
Posted
21 hours ago, JONBLARC7 said:

I'm not sure about BTR but with TExas speed they just spec a higher stage 5.3 cam for the 6.2.

 

On my truck when I called them to talk about the stage one 6.2 cam.  They told me it was to big of a cam for a truck with a stock stall.  So they had me buy there stage 2 L83 cam.  It's a 218/226 .635 .635 112 lsa

 

It's pulls hard.

 

What size is the L83 BTR cam?


Yes sir, this is how all the manufacturers do it. I have a BTR Stage 3 L83 cam in my 6.2. It’s a 215/233 110 LSA. It too pulls hard, no loss in bottom end. Wouldn’t run that big in a 5.3 personally though. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I lost mine at 125K miles.  I bought the truck with 90K miles on it bone stock.  I immediately hooked up my HP tuners and removed AMF only.  And didn't touch any other part of the tune to see if I would loose any MPG.  Drove it that way a month and the MPG didn't change at all.  Now i was runing bigger tires so It would ever stay in V4 mode.  Then I enabled E85 and that all that was done to the truck until it lost a lifter.

 

They are going to fail and there is nothing you can do about it.

Posted

I think there are lots of trucks that haven't had lifter failures with higher mileage. Also believe shorter OCI's help.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

yeah i'm sticking with 3500 OCI , so far only got 66k on my motor, and i run the truck in 5th gear to disable V4 in the city.  i only use v4 on the highway. i hope this makes it last longer

Edited by pokismoki
Posted
On 5/15/2022 at 9:34 AM, KindalikeKane said:

Ive got a 15 Sierra with the 6.2.  I did the AFM/VVT/DOD delete with a kit from Brian Tooley Racing and the kit come with the L83 cam.  Im curius if this was a mistake or does the L83 5.3L cam produce more torque for the bigger engine?  

 

There are threads where guys have put the L86 cam in the L83 with the intent of increasing power.  I had intended to do this at one point.  But, I agree with others that think it's likely a loss of power.  

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

2019 Silverado L84 BTR stage 2 cam, afm dod delete, K&N, long tube headers.. now that I just finished it I reached out to HP Tuners for the ECM swap. Apparently that is dead in the water and I have the world's largest paperweight. Anyone else run into the chip shortage issue? Is there anywhere to turn?

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)

if you want to make more power on the stock engine without messing around with a cam swap, the two mods in the computer would be to remove TCC, and activate PE function at about 60% throttle.  I would guess this is worth 15-20hp and zero wrenching involved

Edited by pokismoki
  • Spurshot changed the title to Factory L86 cam swap to L83 BTR cam. Is it possible, why would you do it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was the GM of a Lincoln Mercury dealership back in the 80's. The service lot was always full with "broken" ones. Plenty of transmissions, power windows and a/c repairs. The only one I'd consider owning would be the Marauder at this point and it certainly wouldn't be a daily driver.  My 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate is my "Lincoln Town Car" in my retirement. I want all the "stuff". Big infotainment screens, one touch power windows, Supercruise (I won't buy another vehicle without it), hands free pretty much everything. I'm going to swap my current truck for a 2027 Yukon Denali Ultimate so I can have the air suspension and surround vision recording along with all the other "stuff". 
    • Yep mine is on backorder also.
    • The Denali Ultimate's grille is tinted, but the "regular' Denali has a bright chrome grille like the current models.
    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...