Jump to content

thoughts on my lowered Sierra 2021 AT4 1500 Single cab?

gmc.ksb
 Share

Recommended Posts

Gangly Senior Enthusiast

Gangly

Posted
Posted

Since you asked our thoughts, I'll preface this with the fact that I'm not a huge fan of lowered trucks as I'm much more into function over form.  The only modification that I see on the truck is the lowering, but I cant tell what components were utilized or how the lowering effect was accomplished.

 

Having bought a set myself, I like the AT4 wheels, but 18" wheels on a lowered truck do not look adequate.  Most guys who lower their truck do so to make it look "sporty" in their eyes, and lower profile tires tend to aide that endeavor more so than taller sidewalls.  I still personally love the wheel though. 

 

An AT4 off road package (basically increased height and ground clearance) badge on a lowered, street queen rings of irony.  I'd pull the badges personally.

 

The truck looks very clean and I know the single cab, SWB trucks are popular platforms for people to start their "performance" builds with.  Personally, I wouldn't care what other people thought though, you do you and modify the truck to your needs and desires.  If you like the look, the stance, and the performance then everybody else's opinion doesn't matter :)

 

Good luck with your future modifications and keep us updated on its progress!

jlong1984 Enthusiast

jlong1984

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't lower an off-road trim truck, but that's just me. If you like it, who cares what I think. 

  • Thanks 1
f8l vnm Senior Enthusiast

f8l vnm

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, shakenfake said:

Please Saudi brother send me one

🤣

GETGONE Enthusiast

GETGONE

Posted
Posted

Is that a true AT4 regular short cab? All we get in the US is the lame regular cab short bed and only engine option is the 4 banger turbo. I want at least a 5.3 and would love it in the bright blue.

TNTSierra Senior Enthusiast

TNTSierra

Posted
Posted

Looks awesome. Love the stance. Can’t stand lifted pavement pounding princess trucks!!  This truck is a street truck and you’re using it and built it for its intended purpose.  I’d suggest putting 22 or even 24 inch wheels on it.  
 

GM needs to hit the street truck market with this type of “stance”. 👍 Congrats. 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • davester
      Replacement Radiator

      By davester · Posted

      And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • davester
      Turning radius

      By davester · Posted

      Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...