Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 17 Silverado 1500 z71 that I bought used with 89k miles on it. Around 93k or so, the transmission had to be replaced. It now has almost 100k on it. I know the transfer case fluid is supposed to be changed around this time. 

 

My question is, what are the odds that they changed the transfer case fluid when they replaced the transmission? Or would it not be standard procedure to drop both at the same time. I've searched and have seen mixed opinions. The paperwork did not specify if it was done or not. 

Posted

Well,

I think if the trans had been serviced BEFORE the owners manual recommends(I do more fluid changes) you wouldn't have needed to replace it. So I bet the transfer case was never touched.

Posted

I agree as far as the trans goes. It was a risk of buying a used vehicle. Fortunately I had an extended warranty that covered it, otherwise I would have been real upset. 

 

Just trying to stay up to date with the maintenance now since I can only assume it wasn't fully taken care of before I bought it. 

Posted

If it were me, I'd go ahead & change it as it only holds about a quart or 2. Easy job.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I would change it out. I would never trust the shop to be proactive, they likely did only what was necessary and used the lowest cost products in their repair. If you are of the believe all lubes are the same, then drive with confidence. 

Edited by elcamino
Posted
On 7/17/2023 at 1:57 PM, Jeff Newell said:

I have a 17 Silverado 1500 z71 that I bought used with 89k miles on it. Around 93k or so, the transmission had to be replaced. It now has almost 100k on it. I know the transfer case fluid is supposed to be changed around this time. 

 

My question is, what are the odds that they changed the transfer case fluid when they replaced the transmission? Or would it not be standard procedure to drop both at the same time. I've searched and have seen mixed opinions. The paperwork did not specify if it was done or not. 

 

 

Unlikely.  Transfer case was probably removed with the fluid in it.  Its only 2 quarts in there so not a whole lot of extra weight.  

 

No more than ever 45k miles IMO for transfer case.  The book shows 97,500mi for "normal use" which is insane because the 2500/3500 chart shows every 45,000mi or for severe use every 22,500mi.  

  • Like 3
Posted

Yeah. Definitely going to change it. Just hoping no damage has been done. No idea how well it was maintained before I bought it. 

Posted

For good measure, I would suggest replacing Front and rear diff as well as the transfer case. You will already be under the truck with the tools out, so what is an extra 30-45 min of time to have fresh fluid in everything?

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted

What’s the best fluid for front, rear differential and for transfer case? For 2015 Sierra 4x4

weight, brand etc..

I don’t get under the truck anymore so what’s a fair shop price for all?

thanks in advance 

Posted

I use a synthetic 75W90 limited slip GL5 gear oil in front & rear.  Walmart Super tech works & is a good cost effective  GL5.

Transfer case takes Dexron 6. I use AC Delco  for it but any Dexron 6 meets the spec.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I used Mobil 1 Delvac 75W90 in my diffs because it doesn’t contain limited slip additive. The additive isn’t recommended for the G80 locker. It took 4qts 12oz for both diffs. 
 

B1ABF76B-EA38-4C0A-93CB-5F44EF90C147.webp.09a714491c9d0182df317c0ceb4656f5.webp

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 7/21/2023 at 7:11 PM, Wyatt1963 said:

What’s the best fluid for front, rear differential and for transfer case? For 2015 Sierra 4x4

weight, brand etc..

I don’t get under the truck anymore so what’s a fair shop price for all?

thanks in advance 

I used Amsoil Severe Gear 75W90 for the Front and rear Diffs in my 2014 and Amsoil Synthetic Trans oil for the transfer case.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, BigBlue2014 said:

I used Amsoil Severe Gear 75W90 for the Front and rear Diffs in my 2014 and Amsoil Synthetic Trans oil for the transfer case.

 

Same here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...