Jump to content

Automatic Transmission Service Schedule

Tom73

By Tom73
in Troubleshooting, Warranty & Recalls

 Share

Recommended Posts

Tom73 Enthusiast

Tom73

Posted
Posted (edited)

What is the regular service schedule for an automatic transmission?  Have checked my owners manual and found the schedule for the transfer case (change transfer case fluid at 90k, if severe use then at 45k) but cannot find anything on the automatic transmission. Dealer is saying I am due for trans service at a cost of about $500. 
‘22 Sierra Limited, 6.2 with 10 speed and 4WD. 
 

Update:  found it for severe use, same as transfer case, every 45k. But still do not see any service requirement for normal use maintenance. 

Edited by Tom73
Bikerjon Enthusiast

Bikerjon

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Tom73 said:

What is the regular service schedule for an automatic transmission?  Have checked my owners manual and found the schedule for the transfer case (change transfer case fluid at 90k, if severe use then at 45k) but cannot find anything on the automatic transmission. Dealer is saying I am due for trans service at a cost of about $500. 
‘22 Sierra Limited, 6.2 with 10 speed and 4WD. 
 

Update:  found it for severe use, same as transfer case, every 45k. But still do not see any service requirement for normal use maintenance. 

Yes I see the 45k severe service interval in my owners manual for the trans fluid but I would not exceed 50000 miles under any circumstances. Do you know how much a transmission costs? Trannys burn out all the time because of lack of maintenance.

  • Like 1
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Changing trans fluid prolongs its life. You pay for that or pay for a new trans, your choice.

IMO minimum every 50k.

  • Like 3
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

I'm told I tend to over maintain my equipment. I do mine every 25K after the first one at 50K showed the fluid had been done for some time. Ask your dealer what the cost of a remanufactured transmission with installation cost. $500 will seem like folding money.

 

Having said that and if you are mechanically inclined, make the job as DIY as possible and save hundreds per service. 

  • Like 2
Tom73 Enthusiast

Tom73

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the responses and I agree that regular service is a good idea. But, still wondering what is GMs recommendation for normal, not severe, use. 

  • Like 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Tom73 said:

Thanks for the responses and I agree that regular service is a good idea. But, still wondering what is GMs recommendation for normal, not severe, use. 

 

They consider it a "sealed lifetime" fluid. Legally this amounts to, by definition 150K. Good luck with that. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
TrailBossMike Enthusiast

TrailBossMike

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Tom73 said:

Thanks for the responses and I agree that regular service is a good idea. But, still wondering what is GMs recommendation for normal, not severe, use. 

Fact of the matter is most vehicles on the road end up crashed, rusted out or sent to the scrap yard with the original transmission, transfer case and differential fluids still installed.  If you even service these fluids once in your vehicles lifetime, you're ahead of most vehicle owners.

If you plan on keeping your vehicle more than several years or more than 60k, change the fluids.  If not, you need to decide if it's worth it to you or not.

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted

So, we're talking about the 10-speed, right?  Which trans do you have in your truck Grumpy Bear?  Isn't it the 6-speed?  Maybe we need to be much more specific about what we're talking about since all 3 trans offered in these trucks use different fluids.  Could they possibly have different service requirements?

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

There’s only one vehicle I changed the rear end fluid in ever, my avalanche. It had 167K. It was the first time for transmission fluid change also. I did the power steering too. The only time I ever did that. Only on this website have I read about people who were concerned with early fluid service. My wife’s 2011 Genesis is the first vehicle that the dealer recommended following the severe service schedule. I did because I had the extended warranty coverage. Even through the years with my work trucks I went extended never gave it a thought. Never had a reason to. They definitely fit the extreme service requirements. I only had one failure, nothing to do with maintenance. Even with most manufacturers saying vehicles should make 200K miles with routine maintenance only. Usually the dealer would stick the maintenance sticker in the window with the extreme maintenance mileage and month for the next service. I would ask they say it’s a precautionary measure. The regular maintenance should be fine. I never reached 200K miles before I got a different vehicle. That’s probably why I never had a problem. We had a couple around the family business that made it without a problem. That being said. I believe and follow the extreme maintenance schedule as a rule. Simply because of the complexity of today’s vehicles. Cheap insurance as they say. 

repairman54 Enthusiast

repairman54

Posted
Posted

Read what severe is, do you drive in town, hot weather, tow, etc ? There is no normal service. 

I change my trans fluid in my fleet every 30k miles. Multiple trans. taken over 250k miles and quite a few doing towing also. Fluid changes are cheap insurance if you're keeping it for the long haul. 

Severe schedule is your friend.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, repairman54 said:

Read what severe is, do you drive in town, hot weather, tow, etc ? There is no normal service. 

I change my trans fluid in my fleet every 30k miles. Multiple trans. taken over 250k miles and quite a few doing towing also. Fluid changes are cheap insurance if you're keeping it for the long haul. 

Severe schedule is your friend.

It’s all a game for numbers. The manufacturers can make claims that are not really realistic. Such as our maintenance costs are lower. Same with cylinder deactivation. In a controlled environment cylinder deactivation will give you better gas mileage. When the chip shortage was here some trucks didn’t have cylinder deactivation. They gave a fifty dollar rebate. They claimed for the average user you may lose a half mile per gallon without it. They all do it. Most cases people trade their vehicles before any problems arise. In reality new vehicles are more vulnerable to maintenance than ever. There’s more going on. More gears in the transmission, smaller engines with turbos and cylinder deactivation for larger engines. If you plan on going past your warranty you better do your maintenance. 

garagerog Enthusiast

garagerog

Posted
Posted

Since we're older now, most of the miles we rack up on our vehicles now are in town, so for the auto transmission service schedule I go by the severe schedule and subtract about 10k or so. I can't think of anything harder on a transmission except one overheated by towing than "grocery getter" miles as the clutches stay very "busy" to say the least, maybe by a factor of 20? over a transmission that sees mainly highway miles and is in lockup mode.

  • Like 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Transient said:

So, we're talking about the 10-speed, right?  Which trans do you have in your truck Grumpy Bear?  Isn't it the 6-speed?  Maybe we need to be much more specific about what we're talking about since all 3 trans offered in these trucks use different fluids.  Could they possibly have different service requirements?

 

Yes, Pepper has the 6L80E. It is not sealed for life. 45K severe and 90K, maybe 95K I believe 'normal'. 

 

They do. But it isn't necessary. Read column two under the heading AMSOIL Signature Series Fuel Efficient ATF. 

g3110.pdf (amsoilcontent.com)   You will find one very good fluid is used for all three transmissions. 

 

Requirements is a tricky word. Environments would be more accurate. Yet the OEM specifies the same services and fluids, for them, meaning different environments, for all. Sans the separation between "Severe and Normal" which is identical for all of them on the severe schedule. 

 

GM has changed fluid specs a few times for the eight speeds. Why? The requirements didn't change nor did the environment. But the factory 'spec' original fluid was made from some very hygroscopic fluid. They are always reaching for the bottom of the barrel for factory and service fills.  

 

Examine the Dexron VI part numbers for the 4 and 6L transmissions. You will find (SDS) that this SPEC under different part numbers is made from several different base oils with a WIDE range of capabilities. They all last a different length of time but the manufacture list them all for the same "Requirement' and service life. 

 

In this one box alone (6L80/90) Red Line, under supervision, may call out 4 different fluids for depending on the environment the transmission is used in. And give four recommendations for service life.

 

Just some things to think about. 

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Just change your fluids more often and if you are keeping the vehicle for a long time upgrade the fluids you use.

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,532 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...