Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As a result of the recall issued by GM on the 6.2 in which 2019's thru to early 2021's that were not involved, I'm curious if the options stated below are being considered by these particular group of owners which I'm a part of as I have a 2020.

 

  1. Keep the truck and implement modifications such as a DFM disable/delete and using a different viscosity of oil.
  2. Trade in the truck for a new one equipped with a different engine such as the 3.0L or 5.3L, or go for a HD version.
  3. Trade in the truck for a new one from another manufacturer.

 

Posted (edited)

My 6.2L 2019 AT4’s extended warranty just expired 3 weeks ago and I’m currently going between option 1 & 2. I’m leaning heavily towards 1, deleting the DFM and running either 5W30 or 0W40. Mostly because I own the truck outright, don’t tow enough to justify a 3L and I still love the thing plus everything new is so expensive.

Edited by Northof51
Posted
9 hours ago, Blade8971 said:

As a result of the recall issued by GM on the 6.2 in which 2019's thru to early 2021's that were not involved, I'm curious if the options stated below are being considered by these particular group of owners which I'm a part of as I have a 2020.

 

  1. Keep the truck and implement modifications such as a DFM disable/delete and using a different viscosity of oil.
  2. Trade in the truck for a new one equipped with a different engine such as the 3.0L or 5.3L, or go for a HD version.
  3. Trade in the truck for a new one from another manufacturer.

 

Number 4. Pay it off keep it for a spare. Then buy another. 

  • Like 1
Posted

number 4 is just stupid. it really depends on if its paid off and mileage or do you like throw away money. i would go with number1. number 2 is not an option, buy newer tuck and most likely you will get a 10 speed which has its own problems. unless your willing to go withe 2.7 and 8 speed , it seems to be GM's most reliable power train for now. number 3 is a crapshoot, ford is no different than gm right now as they are having to also replace a lot of engines. so every manufacturer is having problems. if have money to throw away do what you want to do, if not stick with number 1

Posted
43 minutes ago, silveradosid said:

number 4 is just stupid. it really depends on if its paid off and mileage or do you like throw away money. i would go with number1. number 2 is not an option, buy newer tuck and most likely you will get a 10 speed which has its own problems. unless your willing to go withe 2.7 and 8 speed , it seems to be GM's most reliable power train for now. number 3 is a crapshoot, ford is no different than gm right now as they are having to also replace a lot of engines. so every manufacturer is having problems. if have money to throw away do what you want to do, if not stick with number 1

Interesting response. I’ve done that multiple times. I always have a vehicle available with 10 floating around family members. Especially if you buy CPO you get great deals. The nice addition is if I don’t want to drive a p/u I have choices. Your choice is modify it. Then hope it’s done right and risk being without a ride. My way has served me well. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Blade8971 said:

As a result of the recall issued by GM on the 6.2 in which 2019's thru to early 2021's that were not involved, I'm curious if the options stated below are being considered by these particular group of owners which I'm a part of as I have a 2020.

 

  1. Keep the truck and implement modifications such as a DFM disable/delete and using a different viscosity of oil.
  2. Trade in the truck for a new one equipped with a different engine such as the 3.0L or 5.3L, or go for a HD version.
  3. Trade in the truck for a new one from another manufacturer.

 

Trade it for a 2.7L Turbo 4. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Northof51 said:

My 6.2L 2019 AT4’s extended warranty just expired 3 weeks ago and I’m currently going between option 1 & 2. I’m leaning heavily towards 1, deleting the DFM and running either 5W30 or 0W40. Mostly because I own the truck outright, don’t tow enough to justify a 3L and I still love the thing plus everything new is so expensive.

 

My situation is similar as my powertrain warranty expires in a few months, plus I finished paying off my loan last year.  So I'm exploring options 1 and 2 and so appear to be leaning towards option 1 as through 5 years of ownership the engine has been solid - no issues.    

Posted
14 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Number 4. Pay it off keep it for a spare. Then buy another. 

 

I didn't think much of that option as I figured it would be really expensive to buy a new truck outright with no deposit or trade in.  At least if the new breaks down, then you would still have the good-ole T1XX available for use.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, customboss said:

Trade it for a 2.7L Turbo 4. 

 

Not a fan of the 2.7L's as the idea of a very small engine in a full-size truck is very unusual to me.  However, they do make decent power for an engine of that size.  I'd probably go for the 3.0L.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Blade8971 said:

 

Not a fan of the 2.7L's as the idea of a very small engine in a full-size truck is very unusual to me.  However, they do make decent power for an engine of that size.  I'd probably go for the 3.0L.

Unless you need to tow heavier weights don’t. 2.7 has had no mechanical issues. None of the other lines can say that. 

Posted (edited)

The recall on them is not related to the DOD system, its a bearing, rod, & crank issue.  Because of this, I am not sure that you would want to tear into the motor with low mileage on it, just to replace the DOD system. HOWEVER, i did tear into mine and replaced all the lifters at 120K miles, so I cant really argue against it if you are high mileage.  The costs for parts was around $2-$2.5K and I replaced lifters, rods, fuel lines, and gaskets throughout. Timewise, it can be done in the driveway over a weekend.

 

Edited by Gangly
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 5/5/2025 at 10:13 PM, Blade8971 said:

As a result of the recall issued by GM on the 6.2 in which 2019's thru to early 2021's that were not involved, I'm curious if the options stated below are being considered by these particular group of owners which I'm a part of as I have a 2020.

 

  1. Keep the truck and implement modifications such as a DFM disable/delete and using a different viscosity of oil.
  2. Trade in the truck for a new one equipped with a different engine such as the 3.0L or 5.3L, or go for a HD version.
  3. Trade in the truck for a new one from another manufacturer.

 

I plan on keeping mine. If for some reason, it decides to go south then I’ll fix what needs to be fixed. It still would be cheaper than purchasing a new truck.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 5/5/2025 at 9:13 PM, Blade8971 said:

As a result of the recall issued by GM on the 6.2 in which 2019's thru to early 2021's that were not involved, I'm curious if the options stated below are being considered by these particular group of owners which I'm a part of as I have a 2020.

 

  1. Keep the truck and implement modifications such as a DFM disable/delete and using a different viscosity of oil.
  2. Trade in the truck for a new one equipped with a different engine such as the 3.0L or 5.3L, or go for a HD version.
  3. Trade in the truck for a new one from another manufacturer.

 

Just an idea. Keep the truck and disable DFM with Range Technologies module. Its a roll of the dice but its only about $300.00. I have used them on 3 T1s including my 2025 w/6.2L.

Posted

I’ve had a Pulsar LT installed for a few years now, unfortunately the lifters can still physically fail but it is less likely.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...