Jump to content

Is your GMT-900 using oil  

1,555 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

HCGuy, did you also get the "AFM shield" installed in the oil pan, or just replace the valve cover with the one with the "AFM baffle" in it?

I have not done anything in the oil pan, just the valve cover upgrade.

Posted

Update - 2011 Silverado using oil. OK - I had the 6.2 motor replaced with new "crate engine" (fully covered by warranty), and now have over 1000 miles on it. My original motor would have used about a quart of oil so far, and this one is reading same as when put in service (full.) I expected some use due to break-in, but have not noticed any. Things are looking good so far, I hope this engine remains "tight".

 

Going through the oil consumption checks was a pain, but in the end Chevy/GM did the right thing. Wish the best of luck to you all.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Well, I wasn't taking any chances with my 2013 5.3L. I broke it in like I normally drive it, I deleted the AFM function the day after I brought it home new from the dealer, and I put a oil separator catch can on the PCV line in the first 1000 miles. Hoping to greatly reduce any risk of GM design flaws catching up to me. On last oil change, had 6150 miles on the oil (changed out the factory fill at around 1190 miles). Oil level was down to just below the first dent on the stick below full.

Edited by Cowpie
Posted

I'd like to see how well the "fixes" for this oil consumption problem work. Can we set up a poll?

Something like this:

 

If you had an oil consumption problem with your GM 5.3L V8 *and* had one of the following fixes performed, was the oil consumption problem fixed? (our definition of "oil consumption problem" = more than 1 quart every 2000 miles)

Possible fixes:

1) Valve cover replacement

2) AFM shield in oil pan

3) Range AFM disable device

 

Possible answers:

a) Did (1) and it worked.

b) Did (1) and it didn't work.

c) Did (1) and (2) and it worked.

d) Did (1) and (2) and it didn't work.

e) Did (3) and it worked.

f) Did (3) and it didn't work.

g) Did (1) and (2) and (3) and it worked.

h) Did (1) and (2) and (3) and it didn't work.

i) Did more extensive work (e.g. rings and/or pistons).

Posted

My 09 looks like it will not meet GMs requirements for the oil burn fix. Running at about 1 1/2 to 2 qts low on 5,000 mile oil change test. So would replacing the valve covers help and what would be a cost estimate? AFM is off,

Posted

Go to a different dealer. I didn't have to do a consumption test, they took my word and did the valve cover, 8 lifters and the oil pan reflector fix as well. I now consume less than a liter per 6000 kms and has cut my oil consumption by over 50%.

Posted

2012 5.3L, I do not know block type. Use Amsoil 0-W30 with amsoil filter, changed at 10k religiously. Truck currently in shop with #1 piston down.

 

Pissed off that I'm die hard Chevy and paid for $40K for a truck with problems. Thanks for supporting us, now bend over!

Posted

07 5.3,block type unknown. It is using one quart every 1,000_1,500.This is the same thing as my 06 Impala SS did with the 5.3.Was told it had to do with the displacement on demand........

Posted

Well according to the Dealer and GM.. its not using enough oil for the TSB / Fixes. I explained that it went from 0 oil consumption for the last 70,000 miles to starting to use oil and now at 90,000 miles its using over 2 quarts per oil change (at 30 to 20% life left on the DIC). According to GM it needs to use 1 quart per 2000 miles before they even start work. Close but no cigar.....

 

Time to ask other dealers (60 miles in each direction) and hope they respond better than the local one. At this rate I figure it will use enough oil for GM to do something after 100K miles... which of course I will be out of warranty.

 

Maybe that tray behind front grill is not for a dual battery but for the customer to bungie strap a gallon jug of OIL on for between oil changes top offs.

 

2011 Silverado 1500 - 93K on the clock

Posted

2012 5.3L, I do not know block type. Use Amsoil 0-W30 with amsoil filter, changed at 10k religiously. Truck currently in shop with #1 piston down.

 

Pissed off that I'm die hard Chevy and paid for $40K for a truck with problems. Thanks for supporting us, now bend over!

Sad

Posted

What are the details on the valve cover change? That's a new one to me. Part number(s)?

Posted

What are the details on the valve cover change? That's a new one to me. Part number(s)?

I have a 2008 4WD Suburban with 5.3L.

Here is what they used for my vehicle:

12639759 Deflector

12612350 Gasket

12570427 Cover

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Anybody check plugs to see if a certain cylinder had more ash deposits on it than the rest?

 

 

I pulled these at 102K miles:

 

 

IMG_3843_zpsb051e438.jpg

 

 

 

and here's a closeup of some of the nastier ones:

 

 

 

IMG_3846_zps07be67fa.jpg

 

 

 

When they replaced the pistons + rings at 75,530, they replaced 2 plugs that had, "broken off" during the process. They didn't say which ones, but I'd bet the rear driver's-side (at top left in the picture) was one of them.

 

FC

Edited by Folically Challengjed
Posted

I was contemplating doing the valve cover upgrade and oil pan shield myself until I read my Chilton's guide on removing the oil pan. It says you have to remove the skid plate, move the steering rack and front 4WD differential out of the way, loosen the bottom tranny bolts, and remove the crossmember just to be able to get to the oil pan. Sheesh! Is that right? [Has anybody done that?] I remember my old 350's where you just removed the oil pan bolts and let'er drop!! (The good old days?!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
    • I don't recall ever dealing with one on an '06 and back. It may not even exist on that. I can't remember for sure.   Any kind of ice in or after the evaporator is normally due to low charge with both a clutch-cycling orifice tube system, and a TXV system.
    • Engines wear. It is unavoidable. So the question isn't if it will wear out but rather WHEN it will wear out. That question is about rate and RATE is a HUGE problem for almost everyone; but not in the way we may think.    Unless there is something drastically wrong with your powertrain, wear is exceedingly slow. It doesn't wear out in minutes or hours or days or months but in years or even decades. Ditto sludge and varnish. Humans are an impatient lot so to see the benefit of a truly superior product you may have to wait a very long time. Most will get bored first and trade before they reap the benefit.   Humans are not companionate creatures when it comes to those we do not know. We don't care what happens to the second or third owner as long as it doesn't happen to us or someone we know and actually like.   Sad commentary on humans but it is what it is. That thus, then, there is no advantage...to or for you if the above paragraphs adequately describe you.    BUT if you are a buy and hold type and patient enough to reap the rewards of your labors then that thing that is happening that you haven't yet seen, but will; can be abated by such products. Seals harden and leak with time and lots of it. Rings stick after thousands of miles of a slowly building plaque of varnish.    Then there is this. This didn't happen over night and this poor fellow knew when he removed the cover and not one second before.   Not "aware' isn't the same thing as "isn't happening".        The above was typical of the Ford 361 and 391 bus motors on Bulk Pennzoil Mineral Oil products on 3K mile OCI's at about 60K miles back in the 60's and 70's at the Anamosa School District when my Uncle took over their maintenance program.    This is Pepper at @ 165K on 5K OCI's using Group IV/V Full Synthetics.      HM oils will help the first but not the second.    Then again if one used..... ah, ya know.....
    • Thanks for coming back with an update. 
    • Awesome you got it sorted! That's a new potential issue I'll have to mark in my book of issues. Thanks for the feedback.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...