Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

My beauty, 2015 2500 HD 4x4 Duramax Long Bed

 

 

 

post-133286-0-96450000-1436222650_thumb.jpeg

post-133286-0-96450000-1436222650_thumb.jpeg

post-133286-0-96450000-1436222650_thumb.jpeg

post-133286-0-96450000-1436222650_thumb.jpeg

Edited by calvic
  • Like 6
Posted

Get an account with a free photo sharing site like photo bucket. Then to to the Reply to Topic window and you will find a small icon that says "Image" which will allow you to post up a link to the pictures. PM me if you need any more help.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

 

77ce623770f7175bdec8fe133eaa1da4.jpg He's my 1994 after I washed it yesterday had to post bone my cab corner job since my 13 is in the body shop being repaired.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I'm so busy in the 2014+ section that I didn't realize there's still plenty of members on here that don't visit that part of the site as often. Here's mine

 

adc11z.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

This was 6.22.13, the day I brought it home from the dealer with 7 miles on it. It's loaded with options. Nobody has ever driven it except me, except for factory and dealer folks and the guy who put in the 2" level kit.

 

I've added a bunch of little things to it; 2" front level, Raptor steps, OEM Denali grille, Extang tonneau, OEM wheel well liners, Boss Sport Duty plow, rustproofing, paint sealant, fabric protection, spray-in bed liner and spray-in bed liner material on the lower rockers, floor liners, mud flaps, LED bed lights, Pop & Lock, cabin air filter kit, antenna delete mod, etc.

 

I plan to add a Diablo-Lew or Blackbear tune, Borla exhaust, and maybe slightly taller tires (came w/ 275/55r20's). I'm also thinking about a Rosen touch screen nav radio with back-up camera and a few other mods like foot-well lighting, etc.

post-146252-0-69421200-1441501601_thumb.jpg

post-146252-0-69421200-1441501601_thumb.jpg

post-146252-0-69421200-1441501601_thumb.jpg

post-146252-0-69421200-1441501601_thumb.jpg

Posted

Got the front end done, but had to stop. Too F'n hot out now. May try to get the blocks and spacers in tomorrow, if not I'll do it next weekend. Needs an alignment now, had to put on two new tie rods…
spacer.gif20150905_122809_zpseljde6zc.jpg
spacer.gif20150905_122825_zpsex9ksahh.jpg

Also need to get new extended break lines, they'll do for now, but I don't like how close they sit to the LCA now and they are stretched pretty good when the suspension droops…

Posted

8cec9f3a5206324339badf9457ba8723.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

That's what I need in my garage! A lift... That would make things so much easier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...