Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

All I did was drive to work this morning but it looks like I went mudding in my truck. It was raining off and on all day yesterday and left my roads in terrible shape. I drove through about 6" of mud and sand goo. On top of that, someone decided to drive through it and cut some serious deep grooves. At one point my tires were stuck in the groove and I couldn't turn in either direction. It was kind of fun, even got to put her into 4wd but unfortunately I was trying to get to work so no time to play today....

Posted

Had my boat trailer roll forward into my tailgate today. Wonder how much this is going to cost to repair. It got all the way down to the metal in a few spots. Any thoughts guys?

Sorry to see that, you are probably looking at $400 to $600 to repair and paint, they will probably replace the the Silverado emblem and the LS or LT or LTZ emblem also because they are too aggravating to retape and align correctly.

  • Like 1
Posted

Sorry to see that, you are probably looking at $400 to $600 to repair and paint, they will probably replace the the Silverado emblem and the LS or LT or LTZ emblem also because they are too aggravating to retape and align correctly.

 

Yea it sucks but it happens. Thanks for your thoughts on the cost though that was what i was figuring it would cost me.

Posted

All I did was drive to work this morning but it looks like I went mudding in my truck. It was raining off and on all day yesterday and left my roads in terrible shape. I drove through about 6" of mud and sand goo. On top of that, someone decided to drive through it and cut some serious deep grooves. At one point my tires were stuck in the groove and I couldn't turn in either direction. It was kind of fun, even got to put her into 4wd but unfortunately I was trying to get to work so no time to play today....

Rained like crazy last night, 6" turned into about a full 12". I could hear the slop sliding across the skid plates. The wife gave it a try last night in her Jeep, it's getting bad. I feel bad for anyone with a vehicle that is lower to the ground. Pretty sure someone's going to be getting stuck eventually.

Posted

Hauled with the big boys today.

c0e2eab787842e2aa83dba00a0409ab7.jpg

 

They let you take one for a quick test drive right?

Was around some of those running at a mine out in NV a few years ago.

Amazed at how fast they were running.

Posted

 

They let you take one for a quick test drive right?

Was around some of those running at a mine out in NV a few years ago.

Amazed at how fast they were running.

Not this time, but last time i was there i got ride in one. And yes they will get up and go for their size.
  • Like 1
Posted

Rinsed her and the wife's ride off as well as the garage floor after putting up Christmas lights.

bf77011d85c8c2539f47d35049f2a68a.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Did what I do everyday since buying my truck. Driving through the mud at work. I love working IT and I love working IT for a farm. Best job ever.

Posted

Went to work, Left work drive to Boston to pick my sister up dropped her off at my parents and then went home. All during a snow storm. Love haveing 4 wheel drive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...