Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lol no not tapatalk. Just on the website on mobile mode I guess it doesn't give me no options just to post only I suppose.

should be able to quote with that too, but from a phone Tapatalk is your best bet.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

 

 

Believe me, I've read MOST of them. The problem is there is no actual consensus. As with most things that people have purchased or own, the opinions are swayed towards what they have on their trucks. So it's hard to get a good idea of what's "best" or works the "best" for certain applications.

 

For example, and no offense intended, but you've recommended a lift kit that you own. A good friend of mine who is a mechanic, says he wouldn't buy anything except Cogito. Guess what...that's what he has on his own truck. That's not saying BDS and Cogito aren't top notch, but as other posts have mentioned within these 208 pages plus in other threads, some shops say they are overboard.

 

I don't have an opinion either way, but if I'm on the pavement 90% of the time, and a BDS 4" lift without coil overs is going to be great, then coil overs might be more than I need.

 

I'm just asking about options for lifts, without buying the highest priced/quality kit necessarily.

 

Rough Country vs. BDS. What are the differences that make one "cheap" or ride rougher than stock, in comparison to BDS for example? Would this be only specific to the kit with coil overs? Or the BDS kit without them as well?

 

I'm not a suspension expert...So at first glance, many of these kits offer the same or similar parts. Just looking for some insight.

Cognito would be another good lift but I just view them as a brand you go to when you want 10-12" kits. I know they're really popular with the HD truck guys. And trust me I understand what your saying about bias. I my opinion I found BDS to be one of the best lift kits available for my truck at the time. Plus at less than $3k for the full kit with coilovers it was a no brainer. The biggest difference between high-end kits and low end kits are going to be fitment, quality of materials and engineering. Low end kits are meant to be cheap and no thrills lift. If you've read through all the pages then you've seen the posts. Check out the SilveradoSierra.com forum, there's an old thread on there that compare several lift kits and shows the difference in build quality.

 

adult much? Dipshit

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol it was a joke, a bad one at that. Guess the sarcasm was lost in text.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Cognito would be another good lift but I just view them as a brand you go to when you want 10-12" kits. I know they're really popular with the HD truck guys. And trust me I understand what your saying about bias. I my opinion I found BDS to be one of the best lift kits available for my truck at the time. Plus at less than $3k for the full kit with coilovers it was a no brainer. The biggest difference between high-end kits and low end kits are going to be fitment, quality of materials and engineering. Low end kits are meant to be cheap and no thrills lift. If you've read through all the pages then you've seen the posts. Check out the SilveradoSierra.com forum, there's an old thread on there that compare several lift kits and shows the difference in build quality.

 

 

Lol it was a joke, a bad one at that. Guess the sarcasm was lost in text.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

 

Thanks for the input. I appreciate it.

 

The BDS kit with Coil-Over IFS system is now $3500 USD plus tax. So $4500+13% tax for me here in Canadian dollars. Add shipping I guess as well unless I can find it locally. The kit without coil-overs is about $1500 USD less, so it's a pretty significant price difference. I'm curious if the ride is also going to suck without the coil-over system, or if it's still going to be head and shoulders better than some of the cheaper kits?

Edited by KA0S
Posted

Cognito would be another good lift but I just view them as a brand you go to when you want 10-12" kits. I know they're really popular with the HD truck guys. And trust me I understand what your saying about bias. I my opinion I found BDS to be one of the best lift kits available for my truck at the time. Plus at less than $3k for the full kit with coilovers it was a no brainer. The biggest difference between high-end kits and low end kits are going to be fitment, quality of materials and engineering. Low end kits are meant to be cheap and no thrills lift. If you've read through all the pages then you've seen the posts. Check out the SilveradoSierra.com forum, there's an old thread on there that compare several lift kits and shows the difference in build quality.

 

 

Lol it was a joke, a bad one at that. Guess the sarcasm was lost in text.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

must've missed the "sarcasm lock" key

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

Thanks for the input. I appreciate it.

 

The BDS kit with Coil-Over IFS system is now $3500 USD plus tax. So $4500+13% tax for me here in Canadian dollars. Add shipping I guess as well unless I can find it locally. The kit without coil-overs is about $1500 USD less, so it's a pretty significant price difference. I'm curious if the ride is also going to suck without the coil-over system, or if it's still going to be head and shoulders better than some of the cheaper kits?

First, order the kit through your local Authorized BDS dealer. You should be able to get 20-30% off the retail price if you go through them. They'll simply contact BDS and BDS will approve or deny the price. Second, you can always upgrade to coilovers later. Get the kit without coilovers, save the cash and it'll ride just as good as stock.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

Thanks for the input. I appreciate it.

 

The BDS kit with Coil-Over IFS system is now $3500 USD plus tax. So $4500+13% tax for me here in Canadian dollars. Add shipping I guess as well unless I can find it locally. The kit without coil-overs is about $1500 USD less, so it's a pretty significant price difference. I'm curious if the ride is also going to suck without the coil-over system, or if it's still going to be head and shoulders better than some of the cheaper kits?

 

When I was shopping for lifts, it seemed as if more people were suggesting BDS over every other system available. I figured that had to be for good reason, so once I had decided on BDS, I spoke with my local off road shop about which kit. He said that I would be more than happy with the ride quality of the base BDS 6" lift. He then mentioned I could upgrade the rear to Fox shocks, but then when I asked about the front he said there was no upgrade unless I went with the Fox coilovers.

 

Well, me being as OCD as I am didn't want to run two different types of shocks on the front and rear, so I went with the coilover option. He tried to talk me out of it even though it was a little more money in his pocket. But, I went with them anyways. He said they were over kill for the little off roading I would be doing, and maybe he's right, but I don't regret the decision one single bit, cuz mine rides like a dream. But according to my installer, you won't regret the base kit one bit either.

 

He said every customer that they've sold the base BDS kit to has been extremely pleased with it.

Posted (edited)

Looks good!

 

Quick question for you. How are the CV angles with that lift? I was looking at their 4" system for my 2017 Sierra, and I'm curious to know what the angles are like or if their system adjusts for this.

 

There are over 200 pages to look through, so I thought I'd ask the question. In general is their a lift that would be considered "least risk" or wear? I know their systems relocate th front dif, but I've seen some random pictures of lifts in this forum, where the angle is ridiculous. I'm guessing this is not the case with BDS? What about with ReadyLift or Rough Country? I'm not concerned with hardcore off-roading clearance etc....I would never use that kind of system to its full potential, as I'm mostly on pavement or slightly off-road.

 

Thanks in advance for any input.

 

Thanks!

 

This is the first truck I lifted, well honestly the first truck I've ever owned. I've always loved modding vehicles though and the truck is no different.

 

I did a ton of research when trying to figure out how to lift my truck, I of course have magride, which severely limits my options and knocks out some of the cheaper kits. My biggest worry was destroying the ride of my truck and I believe I have 100% made the right choice.

 

I was originally looking at the Fabtech kids per recommendation of a buddy of mine, but my mechanic told me the kit was basically irreversible which ended up getting me to sway towards doing a 6" with 35's.

 

I looked at many different manufacturers, being RC, ProComp, BDS, readylift, cognito, etc. At the end of the day, the top notch kits really tend to be zone/bds, cognito, fts, and idk maybe a few others. Before BDS I was set on going pro-comp as I had heard good things, I spent the time and drove to a dealership which had a pro-comp lifted truck new and drove it to see how I liked it and I did. When I went to the local pro-comp dealer he couldn't even figure out which kit fit my truck, which was a major turn off and made me re-think my current choice. I had already gone and priced the BDS locally but they wanted $4650 to lift my truck 6" which wasn't going to happen. The gentleman who is authorized to deal in ProComp was trying to talk me into a RC 7.5 in lift. I checked his truck out, wasn't a huge fan of the angles of everything and decided against it. A good buddy of mine also wasn't a fan of a couple of their instructions as well in the install and said he wouldn't run it.

 

Long story short I ended up driving 1200 miles to my house in FL and getting my truck lifted by a BDS authorized installer in Orlando, which is probably the best decision I ever made. If I had to do it again I'd pick BDS, awesome product, awesome support, and awesome warranty.

 

In your position I'd probably go BDS personally without coil overs unless they were going to get used all the time.

Edited by jmele11968
  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

 

Ive done it. I have a Zone 6.5" lift plus I added Bilstein 5100 front and back. Fronts are set at 1.5" setting giving my total lift not counting tires 8" of lift. It drives great. compared to the Rancho shocks that came on it. Alignment was tricky but my guy dialed it in.

 

20160612_062557.jpg

20160612_082244.jpg

Are you happy with the Bilstein 5100 adjustable shocks on the front? I have a 7" lift and would love about 3/4" extra lift on the front. Want to make sure it is okay to do before I go spend the money and go through the hassle of getting them installed. Thanks!

Posted

Yes, Very. The ride is much better than the shocks these kits come with and the added lift was nice too. Ive had them set up like this for 6,000 miles now with no issue.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, Very. The ride is much better than the shocks these kits come with and the added lift was nice too. Ive had them set up like this for 6,000 miles now with no issue.

Cool. Thanks for the info. Your truck looks awesome. We have the same truck ('16 GMC Sierra All-Terrain X) but mine is black. I can tell yours is just a bit more level in the front. I am rather OCD when it comes how it sits. I am also real weird when it comes to noises coming from the front end caused from stress and wanted to make sure that wasn't going to happen. Thanks for the info!

Posted (edited)

who has added a 1.5" body lift to their 6" suspension lift? did it really screw up the ride?

i recently had a 6" fabtech performance kit installed with the coilovers upfront.. the coilovers arent maxed out in the front, but they said ride quality would really get bad if we maxed it out..

not really happy with the height of the front end.. its sitting 1.5-2" lower then the rear.. has a raked out look..

Edited by TT32VGT
Posted

who has added a 1.5" body lift to their 6" suspension lift? did it really screw up the ride?

i recently had a 6" fabtech performance kit installed with the coilovers upfront.. the coilovers arent maxed out in the front, but they said ride quality would really get bad if we maxed it out..

not really happy with the height of the front end.. its sitting 1.5-2" lower then the rear.. has a raked out look..

Did you do the add a leaf on the rear? If you did, removing that would bring the back down to nearly level.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

No I didn't do add a leaf. Its the standard $3500 fabtech 6" kit with coilovers infront, think its just shocks and blocks in rear. Guess I could go with a smaller block in rear..

From the cement to the center of front fender my trucks at 43", rear at 44.5".. but it looks like a bigger difference then that when you're looking at the truck

Thx for the post

  • Like 1
Posted

No I didn't do add a leaf. Its the standard $3500 fabtech 6" kit with coilovers infront, think its just shocks and blocks in rear. Guess I could go with a smaller block in rear..

From the cement to the center of front fender my trucks at 43", rear at 44.5".. but it looks like a bigger difference then that when you're looking at the truck

Thx for the post

I really don't think a body lift is the answer unless you just want more height which is cool but you nailed it with the smaller block idea. That's what I would do because it will make the ride harsher if you max the coils. The body lift would just make your problem taller lol

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...