Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

From Oklahoma, Hmm.... that was a real adult comment. I'm not from Oklahoma, but I do live here.

 

If you posted 20-22, that's believable. Not 27.

 

Mike

 

 

i'll tell you guys soon as I leave Weatherford, Ok and head to Arkansas. Straight shot. Couldn't ask for better conditions for MPG. But then again it will be it's first trip so might not be that great.

Posted

200 miles on mine and I'm barely cracking 13 mpg - I'm chalking this up to winter, remote start usage, and new truck...that and its all hills here, plus the last 50 miles or so have all been in a foot of snow & auto or 4.


Hoping it gets a lot better though.

Posted

I am still at 14.2, even with the download so no improvement whatsoever. mix of city and highway. When I had the download done, was told by the service tech "well it is a heavy truck". Um, thanks. I'm still under 3,000 miles so I am going to give it some time.

Posted

I hand calculated my new AT with the 6.2 motor this morning. I had 110 miles on the tank, DIC showed 17.9mpg and hand calculation was 15.01mpg. I am not worrying about mpg until the motor gets 3000-5000 miles on it. Either way still better than the 2010 5.3/AT this truck replaced and a lot more power/fun factor as well.

Posted

Last week, I took my 2014 Denali to Austin to see my sister for Thanksgiving. I left on Wednesday, and took I-35 from Ft. Worth to Austin. After some traffic bottlenecking and some 55-75mph driving, and some length stops idling, I achieved 22.4 mpg. The truck was 2/3rd's 87 and 1/4 93 octane. Trip started with 86 Miles on the truck.

 

On the return trip, toping off with 93 octane and no stops, alternating between 68-75 miles per hour, the result was 22.6mpg.

 

I am very impressed. No tail wind on either trip. My 2011 Denali would get 17.5 at best. Gotta love AFM!

 

Will

Posted (edited)

I'm getting 20-23 mpg highway as long as I stay around 70 mph. 75 mph + I get about 17-18 mpg.

In the city It drops significantly; I'm usually around 15-16 sometimes 14.

 

My dad bought the same exact truck as me after seeing mine and he is getting around 14.5 city. He has never hit above 20 mpg to my knowledge, even on a road trip. I have a much heavier foot than him so it doesn't make since at all

 

 

Also I'm sitting at almost 11k miles and mpg has been consistent throughout. My dad is probably still under 4k

Edited by KUUG
  • Like 1
Posted

My first 50 miles gave me an average of 8mph and that was babying the pedal. I hope after a few tanks she learns my habits and improves.

Posted

Fuels blends will vary from season to season. Colder months are blended with a higher vapor pressure. It also varies depending on your area of the country and the environmentally mandated requirements for cleaner fuels. Therefore the vapor pressure will differ form one area to another even in the same season.


As for JL83's 27+ mpg, I actually find it plausible if you were able to maintain the same driving conditions for an extended period. I filled up last night and reset the DIC. I drove 11 city miles while not traveling over 45mph and had to stop for a short time at 4 lights. I was showing 27.3mpg when I parked in my garage. There's no way that most people will be able to keep doing that but it's possible.

Posted

Is it possible that the computer is inaccurate?

 

I went down one of the few plowed & flat stretches of road here yesterday and reset 'Trip A'


I set cruise to 33 and got, according to the instant calculation about 24.3 mpg for about 13 miles. But, the 'high mpg' was only showing about 14.2 and the average was 11.4 - If I was getting 24.3 for pretty much the whole 13 miles, wouldn't the high & average be right around 24?

 

I filled up yesterday, so I'm going to keep track, but all of the snow driving yesterday and this morning are going to throw off hand calcs...

Posted

Yes, the computer could be wrong. I got the 27+ by using "Trip A". I did not check the other fuel economy screen. I have noticed that the two do not always agree.

Posted

The computer calculate mpg will always be off, it is basing it off of the fueling calculation that runs the fuel injectors. Hand calculations is the only way to be accurate.

Posted

The difference is as likely to be differences in how fuel the tank is on the 2 refills.

Posted

I think everyone here is getting way off track here.

The question I asked was.....Did any one else have the same problem,....was getting approx 22 mpg

and then took it in for a recall and NOW get's 14 mpg.

ANYWAY

GM saw the post and is going to look into it deeper.,I will post what they come up with.

(P.S. I brought this to GM's attention before and they blew me off!!!!)

  • Like 1
Posted

P.S. I brought this to GM's attention before and they blew me off!!!!)

Imagine that~!

Posted

I am still at 14.2, even with the download so no improvement whatsoever. mix of city and highway. When I had the download done, was told by the service tech "well it is a heavy truck". Um, thanks. I'm still under 3,000 miles so I am going to give it some time.

 

Hey dagwood2001,

 

Be sure to keep us posted of any changes. We are here to help, if you would like us to look into this for you just send us a PM with your name, contact information, VIN, current mileage, and preferred dealership.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jonathan A. (Assisting Jennifer)

GM Customer Care

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 2,064 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...