Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My ReadyLift 2.25" leveling kit rides a little stiff; but then again the day I installed it I also had the wheels and tires switched out (from the stock 17's--Tire--265/70/17 to the chrome factory 20's--275/55/20. I've talked to several people about it, and they tell me it's a combination of the two that stiffened my ride up. #1-The billet spacer is HARD. Good for durability, but no "give". 2-Tires went from a 7" sidewall, to a 5.5". The tire shop tells me for a street tire, the largest I can run with the lift is a 275/60/20. Does anyone have any opinions about whether or not that 1/2" thickness to the sidewall will help my ride quality? Dude at the tire shop did.



Note: I'm pretty sure I can fit a wider/mudder tire (like a 285 or a 295), but I just don't really want a noisy tire right now. Looking for a street tire that'll give me a softer ride.


post-136579-0-29880300-1428423251_thumb.jpg

post-136579-0-29880300-1428423251_thumb.jpg

post-136579-0-29880300-1428423251_thumb.jpg

post-136579-0-29880300-1428423251_thumb.jpg

Posted (edited)

Debating on going with the Bilstein 5100 adjustables or a RC 2.5" with 275/70R18 on my 14 Silverado DCab Z71. Whats everyones opinions on either?

Edited by XxcraigxX11
Posted

Debating on going with the Bilstein 5100 adjustables or a RC 2.5" with 275/70R18 on my 14 Silverado DCab Z71. Whats everyones opinions on either?

 

I decided to go Bilstein because after 4500 miles my stock rear ranchos were already leaking. Didn't instill much confidence that they'd last long. May as well upgrade them now and get the benefit of a level.

Posted

I would be willing to bet that it's due to two things. Your psi and the level kit. I had a spacer level on my truck before going with rancho quickliftsthis weekend and it rode really rough. Lowering my psi to 33 helped, but in the end getting quicklifts was way better.

I had the tires rebalanced, all 4 were off, ride is much better, running 38 PSI now.

Posted

I would be willing to bet that it's due to two things. Your psi and the level kit. I had a spacer level on my truck before going with rancho quickliftsthis weekend and it rode really rough. Lowering my psi to 33 helped, but in the end getting quicklifts was way better.

I had the tires rebalanced, all 4 were off, ride is much better, running 38 PSI now.

Posted

 

I decided to go Bilstein because after 4500 miles my stock rear ranchos were already leaking. Didn't instill much confidence that they'd last long. May as well upgrade them now and get the benefit of a level.

I've hit 60,000 and have had no problems, which makes me think if it's not broke, don't fix it, but I also want to do things properly as this is an expensive truck. My worries is that I'm going to have suspension parts touching where they're not supposed to.
Posted

I've hit 60,000 and have had no problems, which makes me think if it's not broke, don't fix it, but I also want to do things properly as this is an expensive truck. My worries is that I'm going to have suspension parts touching where they're not supposed to.

 

Correct, with any lift you will top out your suspension more often.

Posted

There is a reason Bilstein's 5100s are limited to 1.85" on the 2014/15 silverado/sierras. It's in all likely hood to keep the full amount suspension travel.

Posted

Had a 2" level installed today, still has some rake but i think that might have something to do with the max tow package i have.

post-137286-0-67823500-1428441395_thumb.jpg

post-137286-0-67823500-1428441395_thumb.jpg

post-137286-0-67823500-1428441395_thumb.jpg

post-137286-0-67823500-1428441395_thumb.jpg

Posted

I've hit 60,000 and have had no problems, which makes me think if it's not broke, don't fix it, but I also want to do things properly as this is an expensive truck. My worries is that I'm going to have suspension parts touching where they're not supposed to.

 

I can only speak to my experience where I had leaky shocks already. To do things properly, you need to replace the UCAs when doing a level to be sure or just leave the whole thing alone and keep it factory.

 

You may actually be leaking but just didn't notice it. If you have the ranchos, look at them at the back of the truck. If there is black build up on the white paint then there is most likely a leak.

Posted

Ah, didn't know that. I've never done anything with the suspension on vehicles. They've always been older and didn't come dragging their nose. And I just went and checked my Ranchos and they look like they have this build up you were talking about. Thanks for the tip milligan

Posted

Finally got my new shoes in so, I figured I would put some pictures up. 2014 Silverado 1500 crew cab with the standard box. I installed the Bilstein 5100's at the highest setting on the front end and left the rear end stock. I also put on 17" XD Series Rockstar 2 wheels with 275/70/17 BFG All-Terrain T/A KO2's. As it sits now, it measures 38.25" from the ground to the top of the front fender and 39" in the rear. Before I installed the leveling kit it was 36.25" but there was a different wheel setup on it. Sorry the pictures aren't the greatest. I have removed chrome window visors and plan on debadging and removing the rest of the chrome as well.

 

 

Before:

post-139010-0-28374300-1428506156_thumb.jpg

 

After:

post-139010-0-51681900-1428506169_thumb.jpg

post-139010-0-28374300-1428506156_thumb.jpg

post-139010-0-51681900-1428506169_thumb.jpg

post-139010-0-28374300-1428506156_thumb.jpg

post-139010-0-51681900-1428506169_thumb.jpg

post-139010-0-28374300-1428506156_thumb.jpg

post-139010-0-51681900-1428506169_thumb.jpg

Posted

i just recently bought a new 2015 gmc sierra AT package having a 2.5 RC level installed this week and just ordered 285/60/20 duratracs....am i gonna run into any rubbing issues...i see most people here are running a 295 or 305 with small to no rubbing issues. any input would be appreciated thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...