Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You could always go with the Rancho quick lifts

 

and get the roughest ride ever...had them...never again.

 

Whether you use spacers or super stiff strut (aka Bilstein), you are standing your truck up on it's tippy toes. With spacers, when your front strut flexes, it's doing it with stock spring (or strut) tension, so I find the ride just like stock, except if you hit the top or bottom stops, then it's jarring. I don't have Bilsteins, but since they achieve their lift via increased spring tension, they are going to ride rough.....just like my Rancho Quick Lifts did.

 

Do what you want with your money, but why spend hundreds, if not thousands (ie ICON) just to achieve 2.5"?? Put some spacers in and call it a day. Save your money for a truck lift or tires/rims.

Posted

 

and get the roughest ride ever...had them...never again.

 

Whether you use spacers or super stiff strut (aka Bilstein), you are standing your truck up on it's tippy toes. With spacers, when your front strut flexes, it's doing it with stock spring (or strut) tension, so I find the ride just like stock, except if you hit the top or bottom stops, then it's jarring. I don't have Bilsteins, but since they achieve their lift via increased spring tension, they are going to ride rough.....just like my Rancho Quick Lifts did.

 

Do what you want with your money, but why spend hundreds, if not thousands (ie ICON) just to achieve 2.5"?? Put some spacers in and call it a day. Save your money for a truck lift or tires/rims.

Exactly [emoji1303]

 

 

Sent from my treestand using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

 

and get the roughest ride ever...had them...never again.

 

Whether you use spacers or super stiff strut (aka Bilstein), you are standing your truck up on it's tippy toes. With spacers, when your front strut flexes, it's doing it with stock spring (or strut) tension, so I find the ride just like stock, except if you hit the top or bottom stops, then it's jarring. I don't have Bilsteins, but since they achieve their lift via increased spring tension, they are going to ride rough.....just like my Rancho Quick Lifts did.

 

Do what you want with your money, but why spend hundreds, if not thousands (ie ICON) just to achieve 2.5"?? Put some spacers in and call it a day. Save your money for a truck lift or tires/rims.

 

FWIW the ranchos come with their own sets of springs. Finally found Spurshot's post on the matter. Fact of the matter is without spending money on a proper lift the ride is going to change and even then it's going to change for better or worse will be up to the driver to decide. Problem is it's hard to take the preference/perspective of anyone else because we're doing this for our own personal trucks and it's not like most of us want to buy both just to figure it out. My bilsteins are stiffer than my ranchos that came on the truck but they're considerably more stable and nowhere near as bouncy. I like this thus prefer my Bilsteins. They especially are more comfortable off road when going down turn roads on the farm i'm not bouncing everywhere.

 

 

The lower spacer is limited in thickness by the clearance/interference of the attaching bolt/nut with the axle (on 4wd trucks). Otherwise, there is no functional difference whether the spacer is on top of the coil over shock assembly or the bottom.

Bilsteins do not "pre-load" the spring any more than a stock shock assembly, when the truck is setting on the ground. It's a misconception. Think about it. Any stiffness increase from installing a Bilstein 5100 at its highest setting is from the increased angle of the A-arms which effectively reduce the mechanical leverage of the A-arm acting on the coil over assembly. A spacer will cause the same condition for the same lift.

Your biggest concern with "leveling" should be running into the limit of travel on the upper ball joint. That puts you into either limiting the lift or replacing the upper control arms with revised ball joint angles.

 

 

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/168768-leveling-bilsteins-vs-lift-kit/?p=1563456

Edited by 5RWill
Posted

 

and get the roughest ride ever...had them...never again.

 

Whether you use spacers or super stiff strut (aka Bilstein), you are standing your truck up on it's tippy toes. With spacers, when your front strut flexes, it's doing it with stock spring (or strut) tension, so I find the ride just like stock, except if you hit the top or bottom stops, then it's jarring. I don't have Bilsteins, but since they achieve their lift via increased spring tension, they are going to ride rough.....just like my Rancho Quick Lifts did.

 

Do what you want with your money, but why spend hundreds, if not thousands (ie ICON) just to achieve 2.5"?? Put some spacers in and call it a day. Save your money for a truck lift or tires/rims.

Oh I don't use them... I have the 2" RC level and it rides just fine.

Just offering something else that would give that amount of lift...

That's all!

Posted

This can be done with no problem. I ran that size tire on my 2 inch rc level before I lifted my truck. Most you will have to do is tie back the fender liner. There are plenty of examples of this set up in this thread. I still have pics of mine in my gallery.

 

looks good. HOW do you like the westin pro traxx ??? I thinking 4" ones . Thanks

Posted

 

Finally found Spurshot's post on the matter.

 

His post makes no sense and is counter to the Billstein webpage. He says stiffness comes from the "increased angle of the A-arms" ???

 

Per Bilstein:

"The lift on the 5100 Series leveling shocks is achieved by increasing the preload on the factory coil." <---in other words -- STIFFER.

 

There is a factory distance from the top of the strut mount to the bottom mount on the A-arm. Anything you do to increase that distance is going to change the ride.

 

Increase it with spacers -- you limit travel, so when you go over a speed bump or a pothole, your suspension bottoms out on the stops before it would normally than stock. Otherwise, during normal driving, the ride is stock....it has to be because you haven't changed the stiffness of the original strut.

 

Increase it with a replacement strut, like a Bilstein, you don't lose as much travel, but the truck weighs the same and the Bilstein is only .5" longer than the factory strut, so any lift above 1" (.5" longer strut = 1" of lift) is achieved by a stiffer strut than stock. That has to result in a stiffer ride than stock; there is no getting around that. In fact, the Bilstein, by being .5 to .75 longer than stock, has some of the same characteristics of a small spacer.

 

My Z71 struts are pretty stiff, so with a RC level kit, I've maintained my stock ride for 95% of the places I drive. The last thing I want is for a stiffer ride and less lift for a lot more money, not only in parts, but in labor.

 

This post isn't intended to bash the Billy Lovers....just to give folks new to trucks some perspective.

Posted (edited)

The way i understood it was that he was saying preload is a misnomer. How is the truck lifted once the strut is put into place? It isn't the length of the shock it's the spring perch and the spring. Hence the simple fact that you can get the 5100s and have no lift at all. The spring displaces the same due to the exact same force of the truck weighing down on the spring with the same spring constant that is representative of said spring. The spring that has been preloaded lifts the truck and the only load is that of the truck, that is now lifted. If the spring remained compressed (as it were before put in the truck) there would be no lift. The spring constant doesn't change because the perch is moved up.

 

This is how i had interpreted at least. Or maybe my interpretation of pre-load is just off.

 

http://www.zoomsquared.com/technical-information/coilover-spring-preload-explained

 

The ride is more stiff but so are the spacer kits i've ridden in. No truck leveled i've ridden in road as it did before the lift. That includes two RC leveled truck, one coil spring spacer leveled Ram, and my truck with the bilsteins.

 

And no worries the bilstein guys like bilsteins, RC guys like RCs, and hell if you can afford it i'm sure the Icon/Fox guys like their stuff. They all accomplish what most are wanting: a better looking truck.

 

I wish i could test my z71 struts to verify them against some standard because mine felt bouncy as hell. Like cross a railroad track and your jumping in the seat and the bed is swaying everywhere.

Edited by 5RWill
Posted (edited)

Alright. Did 5100s on top setting. Noticeably stiffer coil on shitty road. SoCal highways are just bouncy the entire way. You feel it. 3rd setting from bottom, softer ride on same roads, but still too much more my liking. Mind you, I'm running KO2s for both settings. Went back to ranchos with readylift 2.25 and noticed an improved ride. Didn't feel like the dash was going to fall apart.

 

I will say I liked the bilsteins for the composure they provided. The ranchos definitely drop off over a speed bump and things of that nature whereas the bilsteins kept the wheels planted. But the crappy SoCal roads just made for a jarring ride. I'm sure the bilstein at stock Height with spacers would be the best bet. My plan is 5100 stock setting with the 1.5" on top spacer.

 

I also want to note that bilsteins at third setting (1.25") looked really good for leveling and I could barely notice the difference in appearance from highest setting. In my opinion, 1.5" is plenty fine for a level. If you say it's not level after a 1.5" level, it's probably because you know it's not the standard 2".

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by g.mando1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The way i understood it was that he was saying preload is a misnomer. How is the truck lifted once the strut is put into place? It isn't the length of the shock it's the spring perch and the spring. Hence the simple fact that you can get the 5100s and have no lift at all. The spring displaces the same due to the exact same force of the truck weighing down on the spring with the same spring constant that is representative of said spring. The spring that has been preloaded lifts the truck and the only load is that of the truck, that is now lifted. If the spring remained compressed (as it were before put in the truck) there would be no lift. The spring constant doesn't change because the perch is moved up.

Yes, by moving the perch up you are simply lengthening the strut by moving up the position of the spring.

 

I'm sure the bilstein at stock Height with spacers would be the best bet. My plan is 5100 stock setting with the 1.5" on top spacer.

A popular four-wheel drive shop I called said the same thing. I have gone with 1.5" bottom spacers and will replace the shocks if the need arises.

Edited by Donstar
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Alright. Did 5100s on top setting. Noticeably stiffer coil on shitty road. SoCal highways are just bouncy the entire way. You feel it. 3rd setting from bottom, softer ride on same roads, but still too much more my liking. Mind you, I'm running KO2s for both settings. Went back to ranchos with readylift 2.25 and noticed an improved ride. Didn't feel like the dash was going to fall apart.

 

I will say I liked the bilsteins for the composure they provided. The ranchos definitely drop off over a speed bump and things of that nature whereas the bilsteins kept the wheels planted. But the crappy SoCal roads just made for a jarring ride. I'm sure the bilstein at stock Height with spacers would be the best bet. My plan is 5100 stock setting with the 1.5" on top spacer.

 

I also want to note that bilsteins at third setting (1.25") looked really good for leveling and I could barely notice the difference in appearance from highest setting. In my opinion, 1.5" is plenty fine for a level. If you say it's not level after a 1.5" level, it's probably because you know it's not the standard 2".

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Guess I'm just used to mine. It's just not that rough to me, i'm also running stock tires still so maybe my opinion changes vastly after i get new tires and rims. My dads F250 is what I would describe as rough. Thing is freaking miserable. You do feel small bumps in the road with the Bilsteins but I love mine on the farm if I feel like hitting the back roads and having a little fun. Much more so than my ranchos. Though I never used my ranchos with spacers. Of the two I tried on previous model trucks i didn't really like. Different strokes for different folks as they say.

 

So you got rid of your Bilsteins and went back to ranchos rather than lowering the Bilsteins and using spacers with them?

Edited by 5RWill
Posted

What's up everybody newbie here. Does anyone know what set up would ride better as far as comfort, 2.5" front level with 5100s on lowest setting or 2" front level with 5100s on second setting which would be roughly 2.6"? Thanks in advance

Posted

What's up everybody newbie here. Does anyone know what set up would ride better as far as comfort, 2.5" front level with 5100s on lowest setting or 2" front level with 5100s on second setting which would be roughly 2.6"? Thanks in advance

 

The mid setting is 1.25" of lift I believe, so paired with the 2" would give you 3.25"....I wondered about this set up but with a diff drop and new UCAs. Otherwise you're angles would be horrible....

  • Like 1
Posted

The mid setting is 1.25" of lift I believe, so paired with the 2" would give you 3.25"....I wondered about this set up but with a diff drop and new UCAs. Otherwise you're angles would be horrible....

Yeah that would be too much I don't want anything higher than 2.5". I think I'm gonna run the 2.5" level with the shocks on stock setting for maximin comfort I think

Posted

I was fine with the 1.25 setting, except I didn't like the skipping ride on the highway. The cracks in the rode in the city didn't bother me. It was the jarring highway ride. I put the ranchos on based on the recommendations of the shop. The owner was familiar with the I-8 near glam is and said his 15 Silverado rode well with stock ranchos and an rc level. I believe a lot has to do with the coil spring preload.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Declaring victory would upset the demons that possess this Blazer, so I won't. But I did make progress today--after it put up a fight. Always a fight.   I had the day off so I spent the morning cleaning up the shop and I thought I'd get ahead of things by filling the cooling system in prep for the final part I needed to arrive: the driver's side knock sensor. Glug, glug, glug....and then the unmistakable sound of liquid hitting the shop floor. It induces the same chagrin when the sonar and targeting laser temporarily malfunction during a late night bladder evacuation over the toilet with the bathroom light off. D'OH!!! That made a mess...   Oh, hey, that knock sensor I removed? It threads into a wet port. Who knew?! Learn something new every day. Put a pin in that chore, I'll fill it the rest of the way later.   The knock sensor arrived at about 1pm. I threaded it in, connected the wire, filled up the coolant, checked for leaks, and... drumroll.... fingers crossed for a perfect start, excellent timing, model fuel trims, and ...no squeaks... Here goes.....   No, it didn't start. At all. I cranked it a few times and it wasn't sounding good. Furthermore, I heard leaking again. Jesus H Tapdancing Christ, stop leaking all over the dang floor. This time I had accidentally overfilled the coolant reservoir and the churn of the water pump via cranking caused a bit to burp out. Ok, just, breathe... Put the flamethrower down. Dang thing wouldn't burn anyway, leaks too much...   Did you know the rotation of a round crank sensor in a round hole, matters? I do now. Took me about half hour to retrace steps and realize what I had done. Then it started right up.   No squeaks. The squeak was the old balancer.   Once it entered closed loop, fuel trims are dead on, hovering right around zero at idle. No more -30%. I'll credit the injector rebuild on that one.   Timing? I think there's an OBD 1.5 translation error with my Actron scanner. It's anywhere from -20 to -30 at idle, sometimes as high as -40 cruising. Sorry, the engine just isn't running that smoothly at -40 degrees ignition advance. It's just not. It's smooth all through the rev range and has decent power. I'm going to have to trust the seat of my pants on this one.   The new exhaust is very quiet. The old catalytic converter? Not melted, but definitely not healthy. Rains glitter when you turn it on its end...all the precious metal is flaking out. Once the new exhaust system burned in/smoked off a bit, the engine's exhaust smell is normal again. Not that I'd recommend going around huffing car exhaust, but, you know what I mean?   One problem to correct. The new exhaust has the opposite problem of the old spliced up exhaust. It wants to hit the floor where the old one wanted to rest on the cross member. Happy medium, please? Still noodling on that one, need to look at how I can adjust some hangers.   I don't know what's next. On one hand I want to run away from this thing as far and as fast as I can -- there have been a lot of NOT fun moments. On the other, now that it kinda drives nice, maybe drive it around for a little bit?   Shhh... it's not currently dripping oil all over the floor. I can see just a little wet at the bottom of the timing cover where it meets the oil pan seal. It's not dripping multiple drops with every ignition cycle, in fact, after some driving this evening it has yet to even form a drop that could drip off yet. But the weekend is young... I fully expect this could turn into Exxon Valdez by Sunday. Because this Blazer hates me. LOL.      
    • About that:   Once upon a time in a land far far away lived a car company that was shy about taking your money and wanted to be sure that they gave you more that you asked for so that you'd come back. No really, not a fairytale. 😱   But after the field got thinned out enough to limit the competition it seemed good enough to give you only what you asked for. Fair enough I say but in such a market you have to give something the others are not or they go to the one who does. Gimmicks or glitz. Oh, fins and chrome. Yea, shinny crow like cars. Yum.    Field narrows a bit more and 'brand loyalty' becomes a thing and the minute it does they start thinking to themselves, "Could we make more money if we gave them less than they expect and they will hang in there for brand and comfort with the known?" They gave it a try and da*n, it worked!!    Well, what if we teach them, groom them into believing that less is "Normal" and cut some more corners. Will that work? Oh heck yea!    🤔 I wonder, can we give then WAY less than they expect and make them mad enough to spit nails and STILL get them to pay up? Sure, if we get everyone else to do the same so that the choice is less or nothing at all. How would be do that? Platform sharing.  What a concept, right?  Steal like there is no tomorrow and it's legal too!    Truth is no one is going to give up driving, not for very long. The Gen Z crowd is fine with it and will be as long as someone not Gen Z will haul them around. At some point we all die.    Economic voting only works if you cast a NO vote now and again and enough of them to get dumb and dumber to wise up. Well, that's how I was taught anyway. And it should have worked. Would have worked. But the Bail out!!   Look, you have another choice if  you take that bag off your head. If the dumb it down to some predetermined expectation of how John Q Public will use it the, that is under design it to failure they you use it to a lower stress mode. D'ho!    A 1950 Royal Enfield Bullet 500 will go anywhere a Suzuki Hayabusa will and for just as long. But you will have to treat it for what it is and not for what you wish it was. 
    • Maybe I was just too unlucky, but I had nothing but bad luck with Bridgestones. Out of 3 sets, they all started losing a lot of air when they got down to about 1/2 tread life, and at that point also wet traction suffered more than it should have. Also, the only tire I ever had in my 60 years of driving that had a side wall blow out was a Bridgestone.   I'm currently running Goodyear Wrangler Workhorse AT and am very happy with them.   
    • maybe when the trip is over, check all the other joints in the front end, like all the ball joints, tie rods, pitman & idler arms, etc...
    • Thks, and actually it was my bad, because here in this post there is someone showing the correct wire position as well. My bad... But thank you a lot with the help as well. I was able to find and buy a 10 channel VPM that came from a sister silverado of mine. The same year, same mode, same trim, same everything. 2022 Silverado 1500 LTD LTZ (pre-refresh). I also found to buy just the bottom mirror part that has the cameras, so way cheap than the full mirror. + a used front camera. I did test everything together, cameras, cables and the VPM.... everything worked EXCEPT my original Bed camera and the backup grid lines. I think the reason is because now I need to do the VPM reprogram. I sent a msg White Automotive & Media Service to confirm that it is the problem and that they can do it service for me case.   Once I get it 100% done I will post here result....
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...