Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was specifically referring to the installation instructions. Motofab is a top down bolt installation and requires you to drop your ball joints to clear the CV axle during install. it sounds like RC is bottom up. Also RC is cast steel and Motofab is machined aluminum.

 

I can only speak to the accuracy of the Motofab info I'm posting as I don't have the RC.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

I have the rough country 2" with stamped steel. It is also top down and requires you to drop the ball joints to install. My truck is 4wd also. Might be part of the issue.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I was specifically referring to the installation instructions. Motofab is a top down bolt installation and requires you to drop your ball joints to clear the CV axle during install. it sounds like RC is bottom up. Also RC is cast steel and Motofab is machined aluminum.

I can only speak to the accuracy of the Motofab info I'm posting as I don't have the RC.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

The RC lower 2" spacer is composite, not steel and the only reason one bolt needs to go from the bottom up is because the half shaft is in the way to prevent the longer bolt from being inserted from the top. I dropped the upper ball joint on one side while installing but couldn't get the other side to release. On the side I dropped, I still couldn't get the bolt in through the top. It doesn't make any difference anyway as long as they're torqued properly to 37 ft lbs. One guy pulled his axle to get the bolts in from the top but it's fine putting them in the other way. Edited by '17 Sierra
Posted (edited)

Sorry to keep asking questions. I don't see any pics of the trimmed carpet on this forum from yesterday, or the past few days. I even searched your name. Sorry if I sound like a stalker. Are they posted somewhere else?

 

I agree, I'm shocked too to hear it rubs, even if just a little. Not what I've been reading about 275 60 20's. With the trimming, would you do the same size tire again, or go down to stock 20's in a Duratrac?

 

Thanks again,

 

Klappy

No worries man, happy to help... this forum is how I got what I wanted!

 

 

I would definitely do it again. Biggest downer was the mpg hit... Lost 3 mpg even with the corrected speedo. I have a Diablo intune.

 

Tapatalk keeps freezing every time I try to post the pic now... Let me see if I can link it.

 

EDIT: Page 354

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/161228-Post-your-2014+-wheel/tire-set-up&do=findComment&comment=1945763

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Edited by Sierra Jon
Posted

The RC lower 2" spacer is composite, not steel and the only reason one bolt needs to go from the bottom up is because the half shaft is in the way to prevent the longer bolt from being inserted from the top. I dropped the upper ball joint on one side while installing but couldn't get the other side to release. On the side I dropped, I still couldn't get the bolt in through the top. It doesn't make any difference anyway as long as they're torqued properly to 37 ft lbs. One guy pulled his axle to get the bolts in from the top but it's fine putting them in the other way.

You don't have to pull the entire axle, just zap out the 15mm bolts holding the axles to the diff , push them aside and drop the bolts in. No need to mess with ball joints.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

So I have a '17 1500 denali ultimate im planning on installing the suspension maxx 2.5 for the Magnetic ride but I was wondering what should I do with the rear and also what is the biggest tire I can use with the stock 22 wheels

Edited by dave8699
Posted

So I have a '17 1500 denali ultimate im planning on installing the suspension maxx 2.5 for the Magnetic ride but I was wondering what should I do with the rear and also what is the biggest tire I can use with the stock 22 wheels

 

I have the same vehicle. My advice is to go with the 2" level and leave the back alone. That's what I did and it looks perfect. If you go with 2.5" you will probably need to go from a 1" to 2" block in the rear, and then you will have more rake than the 2" level alone. Also with the magneride, my dealer told me it's best to stay under 2" - he said the angles start to change a bit too much once you start going bigger.

 

In terms of tires, I stuck with the factory ones. They are not bad at all - quiet, nice looking, and wearing well. You could potentially go to 295s with the 2" level and some have managed to put 305's, but the limitation will be the upper control arms and sway bars, not the height of the wheel well.

 

Hope this helps...

  • Like 1
Posted

I have the same vehicle. My advice is to go with the 2" level and leave the back alone. That's what I did and it looks perfect. If you go with 2.5" you will probably need to go from a 1" to 2" block in the rear, and then you will have more rake than the 2" level alone. Also with the magneride, my dealer told me it's best to stay under 2" - he said the angles start to change a bit too much once you start going bigger.

 

In terms of tires, I stuck with the factory ones. They are not bad at all - quiet, nice looking, and wearing well. You could potentially go to 295s with the 2" level and some have managed to put 305's, but the limitation will be the upper control arms and sway bars, not the height of the wheel well.

 

Hope this helps...

Thanks for the advice what kit did you go with and did you have to recalibrate the mag suspension,do you have any pics

Posted

Thanks for the advice what kit did you go with and did you have to recalibrate the mag suspension,do you have any pics

 

I went with the Rough Country 2" kit designed for Magneride. It comes with little brackets that you use to reposition the sensors, so that it calibrates correctly. Pics are on my profile gallery. The dealer installed it for me.

Posted (edited)

So im trying to decide between the rough country 1311 or the suspension maxx SMX-GM725M which kit will be the best

Edited by dave8699
Posted (edited)

^ Looks nice :)

 

The OP (dave8699) has 22's as he has the Denali Ultimate package. In that case, I'm guessing he can go with a 33" tire but mot much bigger.

Edited by Matt_UKTX
Posted

^ Looks nice :)

 

The OP (dave8699) has 22's as he has the Denali Ultimate package. In that case, I'm guessing he can go with a 33" tire but mot much bigger.

We'll stock tire is 285/45/22 that's like a 32.1/11.2/22 so the biggest tire is probably about 1inch taller and 1in wider correct me if I'm wrong but it doesn't seem like it's worth changing tire for that little bit of extra tire

Posted

We'll stock tire is 285/45/22 that's like a 32.1/11.2/22 so the biggest tire is probably about 1inch taller and 1in wider correct me if I'm wrong but it doesn't seem like it's worth changing tire for that little bit of extra tire

 

Yes, conservatively, I would agree with that. You might be able to squeeze more, but it just depends. There seems to be some minor variation between individual trucks too. I was originally going to go with bigger tires, and when I saw the stock setup with the level, I thought it looks great as-is. Plus, unlike on the 20's and 18's, the factory tires on the 22's are larger (285 vs 275) and really nice. They are also an AT tire, not a regular tire, so unless you plan to go mudding (unlikely with 22's and a Denali) I don't think a change of tires is needed.

 

BTW, you should look up the piping mod and do it to your truck. Some blue piping would look sick that that blue exterior. I did the grey piping on mine and it looks amazing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
    • Got part #s of what you ordered vs what you got?  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...