Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was specifically referring to the installation instructions. Motofab is a top down bolt installation and requires you to drop your ball joints to clear the CV axle during install. it sounds like RC is bottom up. Also RC is cast steel and Motofab is machined aluminum.

 

I can only speak to the accuracy of the Motofab info I'm posting as I don't have the RC.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

I have the rough country 2" with stamped steel. It is also top down and requires you to drop the ball joints to install. My truck is 4wd also. Might be part of the issue.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I was specifically referring to the installation instructions. Motofab is a top down bolt installation and requires you to drop your ball joints to clear the CV axle during install. it sounds like RC is bottom up. Also RC is cast steel and Motofab is machined aluminum.

I can only speak to the accuracy of the Motofab info I'm posting as I don't have the RC.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

The RC lower 2" spacer is composite, not steel and the only reason one bolt needs to go from the bottom up is because the half shaft is in the way to prevent the longer bolt from being inserted from the top. I dropped the upper ball joint on one side while installing but couldn't get the other side to release. On the side I dropped, I still couldn't get the bolt in through the top. It doesn't make any difference anyway as long as they're torqued properly to 37 ft lbs. One guy pulled his axle to get the bolts in from the top but it's fine putting them in the other way. Edited by '17 Sierra
Posted (edited)

Sorry to keep asking questions. I don't see any pics of the trimmed carpet on this forum from yesterday, or the past few days. I even searched your name. Sorry if I sound like a stalker. Are they posted somewhere else?

 

I agree, I'm shocked too to hear it rubs, even if just a little. Not what I've been reading about 275 60 20's. With the trimming, would you do the same size tire again, or go down to stock 20's in a Duratrac?

 

Thanks again,

 

Klappy

No worries man, happy to help... this forum is how I got what I wanted!

 

 

I would definitely do it again. Biggest downer was the mpg hit... Lost 3 mpg even with the corrected speedo. I have a Diablo intune.

 

Tapatalk keeps freezing every time I try to post the pic now... Let me see if I can link it.

 

EDIT: Page 354

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/161228-Post-your-2014+-wheel/tire-set-up&do=findComment&comment=1945763

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Edited by Sierra Jon
Posted

The RC lower 2" spacer is composite, not steel and the only reason one bolt needs to go from the bottom up is because the half shaft is in the way to prevent the longer bolt from being inserted from the top. I dropped the upper ball joint on one side while installing but couldn't get the other side to release. On the side I dropped, I still couldn't get the bolt in through the top. It doesn't make any difference anyway as long as they're torqued properly to 37 ft lbs. One guy pulled his axle to get the bolts in from the top but it's fine putting them in the other way.

You don't have to pull the entire axle, just zap out the 15mm bolts holding the axles to the diff , push them aside and drop the bolts in. No need to mess with ball joints.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

So I have a '17 1500 denali ultimate im planning on installing the suspension maxx 2.5 for the Magnetic ride but I was wondering what should I do with the rear and also what is the biggest tire I can use with the stock 22 wheels

Edited by dave8699
Posted

So I have a '17 1500 denali ultimate im planning on installing the suspension maxx 2.5 for the Magnetic ride but I was wondering what should I do with the rear and also what is the biggest tire I can use with the stock 22 wheels

 

I have the same vehicle. My advice is to go with the 2" level and leave the back alone. That's what I did and it looks perfect. If you go with 2.5" you will probably need to go from a 1" to 2" block in the rear, and then you will have more rake than the 2" level alone. Also with the magneride, my dealer told me it's best to stay under 2" - he said the angles start to change a bit too much once you start going bigger.

 

In terms of tires, I stuck with the factory ones. They are not bad at all - quiet, nice looking, and wearing well. You could potentially go to 295s with the 2" level and some have managed to put 305's, but the limitation will be the upper control arms and sway bars, not the height of the wheel well.

 

Hope this helps...

  • Like 1
Posted

I have the same vehicle. My advice is to go with the 2" level and leave the back alone. That's what I did and it looks perfect. If you go with 2.5" you will probably need to go from a 1" to 2" block in the rear, and then you will have more rake than the 2" level alone. Also with the magneride, my dealer told me it's best to stay under 2" - he said the angles start to change a bit too much once you start going bigger.

 

In terms of tires, I stuck with the factory ones. They are not bad at all - quiet, nice looking, and wearing well. You could potentially go to 295s with the 2" level and some have managed to put 305's, but the limitation will be the upper control arms and sway bars, not the height of the wheel well.

 

Hope this helps...

Thanks for the advice what kit did you go with and did you have to recalibrate the mag suspension,do you have any pics

Posted

Thanks for the advice what kit did you go with and did you have to recalibrate the mag suspension,do you have any pics

 

I went with the Rough Country 2" kit designed for Magneride. It comes with little brackets that you use to reposition the sensors, so that it calibrates correctly. Pics are on my profile gallery. The dealer installed it for me.

Posted (edited)

So im trying to decide between the rough country 1311 or the suspension maxx SMX-GM725M which kit will be the best

Edited by dave8699
Posted (edited)

^ Looks nice :)

 

The OP (dave8699) has 22's as he has the Denali Ultimate package. In that case, I'm guessing he can go with a 33" tire but mot much bigger.

Edited by Matt_UKTX
Posted

^ Looks nice :)

 

The OP (dave8699) has 22's as he has the Denali Ultimate package. In that case, I'm guessing he can go with a 33" tire but mot much bigger.

We'll stock tire is 285/45/22 that's like a 32.1/11.2/22 so the biggest tire is probably about 1inch taller and 1in wider correct me if I'm wrong but it doesn't seem like it's worth changing tire for that little bit of extra tire

Posted

We'll stock tire is 285/45/22 that's like a 32.1/11.2/22 so the biggest tire is probably about 1inch taller and 1in wider correct me if I'm wrong but it doesn't seem like it's worth changing tire for that little bit of extra tire

 

Yes, conservatively, I would agree with that. You might be able to squeeze more, but it just depends. There seems to be some minor variation between individual trucks too. I was originally going to go with bigger tires, and when I saw the stock setup with the level, I thought it looks great as-is. Plus, unlike on the 20's and 18's, the factory tires on the 22's are larger (285 vs 275) and really nice. They are also an AT tire, not a regular tire, so unless you plan to go mudding (unlikely with 22's and a Denali) I don't think a change of tires is needed.

 

BTW, you should look up the piping mod and do it to your truck. Some blue piping would look sick that that blue exterior. I did the grey piping on mine and it looks amazing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 912 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...