Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

CH1991 that Silverado looks beefy with Toyos. Careful when you go offroad a big bump will cause you to rub from the looks of it.

Posted

I'll eventually quit gawking at the truck but right now i just can't help myself..

042970F0-9817-4274-A435-56819F921D63_zps

  • Like 4
Posted

whats the set up?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bilstein 5100s at the highest setting

Airaid MIT

Method 17x8.5

295/70r17 Toyo RTs

Probably ordering a borla muffler and a tip within the next two weeks. Then by the summer hoping for headers and a tune.

Posted

Bilstein 5100s at the highest setting

Airaid MIT

Method 17x8.5

295/70r17 Toyo RTs

Probably ordering a borla muffler and a tip within the next two weeks. Then by the summer hoping for headers and a tune.

looks great! I didn't know the 5100s could give that much lift. Looks higher!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I know right? I just think i got lucky with my particular truck. 1.8" has turned out great.

Posted (edited)

I'm about to purchase a Top Gun Customz 2.5" leveling kit and 1.5" add a leaf for my '15 Silverado. Saw it on Magstar's truck that came out perfect so the heights aren't the issue. What I'm trying to determine is if it's worth paying someone else to do the labor--$300 for the leveling kit and another $150 for the add a leaf, both matching quotes from nearby 4x4 shops. The $300 does include an alignment, btw.

 

I'm reasonably mechanically inclined and for half that can buy a jack, stands and wrenches to do the job. Plus I have a torque wrench and sometimes doubt that shops pay attention to torque settings for such work. YouTube is loaded with videos on how to do it all.

 

Anyone have helpful words to offer on this...I'd appreciate it.

Edited by Shredder15
Posted (edited)

So I put a rough country 2.5" on my 2016 AT up front, nothing in the back. I also have 295/60/20 on stock wheels. I was looking at the angle of my control arms at the end and it seems pretty steep. I was wondering yalls opinion? Would new control arms fix this or what? What are the long term consequences of this?

 

 

is this really the angle of just a 2.5" kit? that looks awful..

post-148956-0-08526200-1487608155.jpg

post-148956-0-08526200-1487608155.jpg

post-148956-0-08526200-1487608155.jpg

post-148956-0-08526200-1487608155.jpg

Edited by Criscone
Posted (edited)

16+ now require the strut to be taken apart to install a coil spacer (for 2.5 RC lift). really debating just installing the lower 2" spacer and not doing the extra .5

 

whats everyone's opinions on just doing the 2" vs 2.5". really worth it?

Edited by Criscone
Posted

16+ now require the strut to be taken apart to install a coil spacer (for 2.5 RC lift). really debating just installing the lower 2" spacer and not doing the extra .5

 

whats everyone's opinions on just doing the 2" vs 2.5". really worth it?

A lot of guys say that 2.5" is the max you should go. I like to keep well within the safe zone so I went with 2" RC lower spacer and nothing in the rear. I like the way it sits; about a 3/4" rake is all now and IMO looks perfect.

Posted

16+ now require the strut to be taken apart to install a coil spacer (for 2.5 RC lift). really debating just installing the lower 2" spacer and not doing the extra .5

 

whats everyone's opinions on just doing the 2" vs 2.5". really worth it?

 

IMO I think the 2" is fine. I wanted to get the extra .5" to be perfectly level, but I dont mind the minimal rake mine has now, and it is a safer and much simpler option than doing the 2.5". I would just stick to the 2". The extra .5" just isnt worth the hassle.

Posted

A lot of guys say that 2.5" is the max you should go. I like to keep well within the safe zone so I went with 2" RC lower spacer and nothing in the rear. I like the way it sits; about a 3/4" rake is all now and IMO looks perfect.

I have the RC upper and lower spacers and if I had to do all over again I would just do bottom only. I've had ball joints creaking and making noise since the first week. I had two reputable 4x4 shops check out the install and everything was installed correctly. This is with aluminum control arms. With both spacers it's really stretching it.

Also with both spacers @2.5 on the front only it looks nose high at times. But it is dead level.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

IMO I think the 2" is fine. I wanted to get the extra .5" to be perfectly level, but I dont mind the minimal rake mine has now, and it is a safer and much simpler option than doing the 2.5". I would just stick to the 2". The extra .5" just isnt worth the hassle.

 

you happen to have any of your truck? not many on this thread so far of new body style w/ 2" level

Posted

16+ now require the strut to be taken apart to install a coil spacer (for 2.5 RC lift). really debating just installing the lower 2" spacer and not doing the extra .5

 

whats everyone's opinions on just doing the 2" vs 2.5". really worth it?

This is a 2" Motofab. Well worth it.

 

abc4c9bde596599a7d32cab8aeeb789d.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

Ok Guys I have a question I just put my new wheels on for the summer & I'm rubbing alot more than I thought.... anyways I started doing some trimming on the inner Cab I cut about 2 inch off the inside plastic cab corner end cap thing... and made a cut in my carpeted wheel well liner, got it out of the way then bent / hammered the sheet metal back on the corner... I did this to both side but for some reason the passenger side still is hitting it's like that wheel well is smaller then the drivers side.?

 

My question is; I only have a 2 inch RC spacer in the front if I add the thin plate on top of the front coil overs would I need to get another aliment it would be another .5 of lift & how much do you think it will help my rubbing situation?

Thanks In advance here's a picture 27d4f0c1d656289209fa452a8603d36a.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N920R4 using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,889
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    smandy
    Newest Member
    smandy
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 497 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
    • from another thread   Update...although the truck sometimes seems to idle weird and the transmission shift a little weird, I've driven about 7,000  miles and no issues.   However, the way GM has handled my rental reimbursement, the situation when my truck quit, and the recall in general has led me to this point...I have driven a GM vehicle for the past 46 years and unless I buy a C3 Corvette, this is the last GM vehicle I will ever own. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...