Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Idk why the pictures flip but that’s where I cut. Today I rubbed a little while backing out of my driveway and turning the whee all the way. I’m sure if I cut the felt up a little higher I would rub but I’m not. I spray painted the metal tab I cut and hit the edges up. 
AAD650EB-6E27-4ED4-A7FF-52BCE72AEAB1.thumb.jpeg.bb13689d43a8123827184d357b90fdb8.jpeg
D51A71CE-60AC-4CF9-9713-F5343D27C836.thumb.jpeg.d285db6cd4d4cee0157c35e7b97e9402.jpeg


How tall are the back tires from ground to top of the tread when on the truck?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
2 hours ago, jgraves13 said:

 


How tall are the back tires from ground to top of the tread when on the truck?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I’m gonna say about 33.5 inches 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I want a lift...…….but it sounds like 2.5" is the max these trucks should have, before doing a full bracket lift?

 

I am thinking about a 2.5" front leveling kit, using the stock struts

 

1/2" bottom strut spacer and a 2" top spacer or a 2" bottom strut spacer and 1/2" top spacer? Which would be better and why?

 

Then, I would remove the stock rear block (1-1/4") and installing a 2" or 2.5" tall rear block

 

The cap and gear sagged the rear end almost 3/4"...………..so I am leaning towards the 2.5" rear block

 

I like my 18" wheels and want to try to keep them, just add larger tires

 

 

20200314_100646_zpsvqgbpmd5.jpg

 

 

20200314_100633_zpsxopbkf7n.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Posted
I want a lift...…….but it sounds like 2.5" is the max these trucks should have, before doing a full bracket lift?
 
I am thinking about a 2.5" front leveling kit, using the stock struts
 
1/2" bottom strut spacer and a 2" top spacer or a 2" bottom strut spacer and 1/2" top spacer? Which would be better and why?
 
Then, I would remove the stock rear block (1-1/4") and installing a 2" or 2.5" tall rear block
 
The cap and gear sagged the rear end almost 3/4"...………..so I am leaning towards the 2.5" rear block
 
I like my 18" wheels and want to try to keep them, just add larger tires
 
 
20200314_100646_zpsvqgbpmd5.jpg
 
 
20200314_100633_zpsxopbkf7n.jpg
 

Just do a 2.5” top spacer. No point in splitting it between top and bottom


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
On 3/21/2020 at 1:21 PM, KOZ45 said:

I want a lift...…….but it sounds like 2.5" is the max these trucks should have, before doing a full bracket lift?

 

I am thinking about a 2.5" front leveling kit, using the stock struts

 

1/2" bottom strut spacer and a 2" top spacer or a 2" bottom strut spacer and 1/2" top spacer? Which would be better and why?

 

Then, I would remove the stock rear block (1-1/4") and installing a 2" or 2.5" tall rear block

 

The cap and gear sagged the rear end almost 3/4"...………..so I am leaning towards the 2.5" rear block

 

I like my 18" wheels and want to try to keep them, just add larger tires

 

 

20200314_100646_zpsvqgbpmd5.jpg

 

 

20200314_100633_zpsxopbkf7n.jpg

 

What I have on my truck

https://www.roughcountry.com/gm-leveling-lift-kit-1305-10.html

Posted (edited)
On 3/21/2020 at 12:21 PM, KOZ45 said:

I want a lift...…….but it sounds like 2.5" is the max these trucks should have, before doing a full bracket lift?

 

I am thinking about a 2.5" front leveling kit, using the stock struts

 

1/2" bottom strut spacer and a 2" top spacer or a 2" bottom strut spacer and 1/2" top spacer? Which would be better and why?

 

Then, I would remove the stock rear block (1-1/4") and installing a 2" or 2.5" tall rear block

 

The cap and gear sagged the rear end almost 3/4"...………..so I am leaning towards the 2.5" rear block

 

I like my 18" wheels and want to try to keep them, just add larger tires

 

 

20200314_100646_zpsvqgbpmd5.jpg

 

 

20200314_100633_zpsxopbkf7n.jpg

 

looks a bit familiar...I only added  a RC 2" level and 285/65R18 KO2s on my stock rims... I'm please with the stance...

 

post-162426-0-99530500-1503328109_thumb.jpg5b1e6d734ec86_truck1.thumb.jpg.8ea1c2e9459482fe32ec29511d267278.jpg

 

Edited by spenpet
  • Like 1
Posted

How much room do you have with the 285/65R18?

 

275/70R18 : 33.20" x 10.80" (1.6" taller and .40" wider than stock

Not much of a increase over stock......I know I could fit a 275 series easy, but also like the wider tread

285/65R18 : 32.60" x 11.20" (1" taller and 0.8" wider than stock)
285/70R18 : 33.70" x 11.20" (2.1" taller and 0.8" wider than stock)
285/75R18 : 34.80" x 11.20" (3.2" taller and 0.8" wider than stock)
 
 
Posted
Went with the pro comp pro runner shocks, front is leveled just under 1.8”. 
 
 
58B4FCF6-973C-4893-83B6-F0B0BB383091.thumb.jpeg.e1b8f866fb7a89cde6240abbc62decc1.jpeg

Did you have to trim any metal to fit those tires?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 minutes ago, jgraves13 said:


Did you have to trim any metal to fit those tires?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nope just had to do the normal trimming on the plastic. I bought some trim plates just in case, but I didn’t have to use them. 

Posted
Nope just had to do the normal trimming on the plastic. I bought some trim plates just in case, but I didn’t have to use them. 

Great thanks! Do you have any pictures of what you trimmed? I want to do the same setup


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
19 minutes ago, jgraves13 said:


Great thanks! Do you have any pictures of what you trimmed? I want to do the same setup


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not the cleanest trim, I used a dremel tool. 
 

BA0C885F-8D3E-48D9-B48B-27F30909EE1C.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Quick question, I searched for hours with not too much conclusive luck...

 

Will aftermarket control arms such as Readylift work for a 2017 Denali with magneride? I have a 2.5 inch level kit waiting to go on but want to replace the stamped steel control arms as well to be safe.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

2017
2.25 Ready Lift
Zone add a leaf
285/60r20 Norcal Mod No Rubf1af57ab65756cf07d6475246bf15f22.jpgd805de75c0f2e7e4f1866c78e73db6a1.jpg

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...