Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted


You have to unless you only want to do the bottom 2 inch, in that case why get the 2.5 kit.?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You can just loosen the upper ball joint and use a pry bar. No need to totally remove


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 hour ago, MOhunter92 said:

 


You have to unless you only want to do the bottom 2 inch, in that case why get the 2.5 kit.?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

becuse for now im on stock tire... and 2.5 with stock tire it look like the truck have skipped leg days... so im going only 2in front for now

Posted
7 minutes ago, Bushleaguechew said:

 


You can just loosen the upper ball joint and use a pry bar. No need to totally remove


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

thanks ill try that

Posted
becuse for now im on stock tire... and 2.5 with stock tire it look like the truck have skipped leg days... so im going only 2in front for now


It’s 1/2 inch difference just a big waste of time to do it all over again but it’s your time and truck so by all means.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

7dc53aaa632e33e779b2593a634e9933.jpg50f13bad970ee2661cba2d8fe8079f3a.jpg

Suspension angles on the RC 2.5 inch on my 2016 Sierra. Cast steel arms, rides slightly stiffer than stock but not terribly noticeable. It’s weird how sometimes the truck looks like it has a ton of rake still and sometimes it looks close to level. Sitting just under 40 1/2 in the rear and 38 1/2 in the front, I like the look. Not a fan of nose high at all


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted


You can just loosen the upper ball joint and use a pry bar. No need to totally remove


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yes there is, you can’t move the hub out of the way to put the bolts from the top down on the bottom spacer without removing the ball joint and moving the hub out of the way a bit. Otherwise putting the bolts bottom up will result in contact with your cv axle. There’s pics of it in this thread along with it’s in the directions for the kit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
7dc53aaa632e33e779b2593a634e9933.jpg50f13bad970ee2661cba2d8fe8079f3a.jpg

Suspension angles on the RC 2.5 inch on my 2016 Sierra. Cast steel arms, rides slightly stiffer than stock but not terribly noticeable. It’s weird how sometimes the truck looks like it has a ton of rake still and sometimes it looks close to level. Sitting just under 40 1/2 in the rear and 38 1/2 in the front, I like the look. Not a fan of nose high at all


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I’d install a 1” diff drop if it were my truck. I did in mine


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 hour ago, MOhunter92 said:

 


Yes there is, you can’t move the hub out of the way to put the bolts from the top down on the bottom spacer without removing the ball joint and moving the hub out of the way a bit. Otherwise putting the bolts bottom up will result in contact with your cv axle. There’s pics of it in this thread along with it’s in the directions for the kit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

that good to know thanks ill do it properly then

  • Like 1
Posted


I’d install a 1” diff drop if it were my truck. I did in mine


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Not worried about it at all actually. I thought it would be worse than it is, if my ball joints and cv axles go out at 80000 oh well I’ll replace them. I think it’s unnecessary on a 2.5, the 3.5 kit comes with 1 inch diff drop spacers and the angles would look similar to this besides upper and lower ball joint. My buddies 3.5 kit (which I am not advocating nor would I install on my personal truck) had his ball joints and CVs go out at 135K miles. That’s basic maintenance at that point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

My 2 options are:

 

Bilstein 5100 1.8" setting with Toyo Open Country AT 2 295/55/20s. (Stock wheels)

 

--OR--

 

Bilstein 5100 1.8" setting PLUS 0.5" spacer for roughly 2.3" of level, and BFG KO2's 285/60/20.  (Stock wheels)

 

 

Leaning more towards first one, but concerned about control arm rub.  Second one I assume may rub on fender, but probably can be fixed more easily.  Anyone have the same/similar setup or have some input?

 

Posted
On 3/13/2018 at 11:52 AM, allblack16 said:

Installed a 3" Motofab level on my 2016 Silverado Z71 last weekend. Rear is stock. Wheels are 20x12 -44 offset and tires are 33x12.5. Took some plastic and metal trimming, no rub at full turn. Before and after pics below. Smoking my turn signals and corner markers this weekend.. will probably vinyl wrap the chrome bumper mustache too.

IMG_0171.JPG

IMG_0173.JPG

IMG_0170.JPG

IMG_0174.jpg

IMG_0169.jpg

IMG_0175.jpg

IMG_0177.jpg

Nice!  Did you leave the stock block in the back and if so, do you know what the size of that stock block is?

Posted
Nice!  Did you leave the stock block in the back and if so, do you know what the size of that stock block is?


1.25”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
6 minutes ago, Bushleaguechew said:

 


1.25”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Thanks. 

Posted

I found this leaf spring lowering kit at AutoZone for $40 lowered the rear 2 inches now it sits level. for the price it cant be beat i dont do any towing or haul heavy loads so it works perfect for me

5ab31ca35b93b_lowkit.jpg.074166a42eafe06d0ea613a3c43a540a.jpg

 

Posted
8 hours ago, maxim562 said:

I found this leaf spring lowering kit at AutoZone for $40 lowered the rear 2 inches now it sits level. for the price it cant be beat i dont do any towing or haul heavy loads so it works perfect for me

5ab31ca35b93b_lowkit.jpg.074166a42eafe06d0ea613a3c43a540a.jpg

 

That's something I am interested in... Can you provide pics and measurements...

Thanks for posting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...