Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can someone explain to me how it's even possible to post pics on this forum using it with an I phone?

If you can't figure it out, your not allowed to post! JK

 

Tapatalk app is the easiest , or else you would have to reduce your pic size which is a pita!!

Posted

Can someone explain to me how it's even possible to post pics on this forum using it with an I phone?

Yup. It's a pain for sure. Tapatalk app makes it easy. Click the "add photo" button, select photo. Lol. No need to worry about photo resizing, photo hosting somewhere else.... etc. for videos though, you'll have to upload to YouTube, Vimeo or equivalent, then post the link.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

So I'm torn between the Nitto Trail Grappler vs Toyo Open Country MT. I'm going a zone 4.5" lift on stock 20's. 295/65 is the size I'm looking at. I have never run Toyo's. Any thoughts?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Give the Ridge Grapplers a look if you haven't ordered your tires yet.

  • Like 1
Posted

So I'm torn between the Nitto Trail Grappler vs Toyo Open Country MT. I'm going a zone 4.5" lift on stock 20's. 295/65 is the size I'm looking at. I have never run Toyo's. Any thoughts?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Loving my Toyo RTs!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

My 2014 High Country. Owned it about 4 months now. Had 6700 miles when I bought it, 15,000 now.

 

Having owned a 2007 Sierra SLE2 and a 2007 Tahoe LT3, each with the 5.3L, I have to say I love *love* the 6.2L motor.

 

My wife's 2010 Suburban has the 5.3L as well, and I have to say the difference is still massive. The extra power is significant.

 

I will also say I'm kind of disappointed in the internal cabin space of the Silverado. The F150 feels a lot roomier - hell my 07 Sierra felt a lot roomier, and it had bucket seats in front too. The Silverado rear seats also feel a bit tighter with less legroom than the F150 or my buddy's Tundra.

 

But the rest of it is awesome. Interior, features, stereo...even the mileage is decent, with 15-16 city and 20-21 hwy.

 

 

 

0gcgbCK.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

My 2014 High Country. Owned it about 4 months now. Had 6700 miles when I bought it, 15,000 now.

 

Having owned a 2007 Sierra SLE2 and a 2007 Tahoe LT3, each with the 5.3L, I have to say I love *love* the 6.2L motor.

 

My wife's 2010 Suburban has the 5.3L as well, and I have to say the difference is still massive. The extra power is significant.

 

I will also say I'm kind of disappointed in the internal cabin space of the Silverado. The F150 feels a lot roomier - hell my 07 Sierra felt a lot roomier, and it had bucket seats in front too. The Silverado rear seats also feel a bit tighter with less legroom than the F150 or my buddy's Tundra.

 

But the rest of it is awesome. Interior, features, stereo...even the mileage is decent, with 15-16 city and 20-21 hwy.

 

 

 

0gcgbCK.jpg

 

That is because the cabs are bigger than ours. I am good with the cab size, going bigger requires a shorter bed to fit in a standard garage, I have less than 3 inches to spare in mine. I am 6'5 and my dad is 6'4 and brother 6'2 and both sit behind me with out touching the seats where I have it set to drive.

 

Surprisingly there is more room in the back than the second row of our Yukon Denali (2012), they were not efficient in designing that interior.

 

Tyler

Posted

 

That is because the cabs are bigger than ours. I am good with the cab size, going bigger requires a shorter bed to fit in a standard garage, I have less than 3 inches to spare in mine. I am 6'5 and my dad is 6'4 and brother 6'2 and both sit behind me with out touching the seats where I have it set to drive.

 

Surprisingly there is more room in the back than the second row of our Yukon Denali (2012), they were not efficient in designing that interior.

 

Tyler

 

One of the things that drives me nuts about my wife's 2010 Suburban - that second row, man. We've got young kids. Two car seats.

 

The LATCH system is not on all three seat locations in that second row. Only two. The middle, and the passenger side. Only problem with that is that the passenger side is the flip-down seat to get access to the back row! What the hell were they thinking there?

 

Luckily the new ones have it on all locations. But I can't even imagine what the logic was behind that.

Posted

59dfb8bb72c685562ec0f592a1dcf48c.jpg6eaff3c1cff0aec45ac83b53f38fe165.jpg

 

Finally completed

Zone 4.5" with 295/65/20 Trail Graps on stickers... Rides better than stock...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

59dfb8bb72c685562ec0f592a1dcf48c.jpg6eaff3c1cff0aec45ac83b53f38fe165.jpg

 

Finally completed

Zone 4.5" with 295/65/20 Trail Graps on stickers... Rides better than stock...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks really good man

Edited by bwilliams22685
  • Like 2
Posted

4596668d393b5f5d328bbcc31ddd3fe6.jpg

23e73976eae420c4ccd2bc1cb57c6225.jpg2461bd7be6338ea808244365e1ef4c9c.jpg

Trying to decide on leaving the Sport Bar on or taking it off.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are your B-Pillars OEM flat black? Or did you do it?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
    • Rockauto bud. I pass local stores for parts.   Findya something online. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...