Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

I dont know how you can beat TSP headers for the money. My GM Borla is perfect for now, but when warranty is up gonna be real hard to not be putting those in the next day with a tune.

 

http://www.texas-speed.com/c-3288-headers-xy-pipes.aspx

 

Shorties seem like a waste of money to me unless you have a really tight space like on a swap car, or real low clearance on a slammed car.

http://www.texas-speed.com/p-4900-texas-speed-performance-1-78-304-stainless-steel-long-tube-headers-y-pipe-2014-53l-62l-chevygmc.aspx

 

You're not lying 632$ for headers and a Y-pipe hard to beat.

 

 

Edited by 5RWill
  • Like 1
Posted

This is the 5.3 with Flowmaster 10, from inside the truck, rear sliding window open, all other windows closed. Moderate acceleration onto highway.

 

 

Posted

Yeah i've been reading about short headers all days and it's about equal to just adding a MIT, for a lot more money. Been watching Matt Earle's video with the XR1 40085/Kooks longtube, i love the WOT sound and warm start is okay. Cold start sounds loud as hell. The rest of it i love.

 

 

Thanks for watching. The cold start on anything with headers is pretty loud, but you can actually fix some of that with a tune and keep the RPMs down some at the lower temps. I am actually running the 40943 oval XR-1 now and should have videos soon.

Posted

I can say, my cold start is not super loud. The resonator helps a lot.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

That truck looks familiar.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

Ha i figured it would be someone's on this board.

 

I was thinking you had the right idea with the oval muffler and then adding headers, so it didn't become overly loud like the round XR1s. I'm listening on good speakers now to see what i think i like.

 

Did you notice any MPG gain with the exhaust/headers/MIT/tune?

 

I noticed where you said you probably wouldn't go headers again, was the Dyno reading posted with a tune/headers/MIT/exhaust?

Edited by 5RWill
  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

 

Ha i figured it would be someone's on this board.

 

I was thinking you had the right idea with the oval muffler and then adding headers, so it didn't become overly loud like the round XR1s. I'm listening on good speakers now to see what i think i like.

 

Did you notice any MPG gain with the exhaust/headers/MIT/tune?

 

I noticed where you said you probably wouldn't go headers again, was the Dyno reading posted with a tune/headers/MIT/exhaust?

Sorry my video quality sucks.

 

I honestly didn't leave the truck stock long enough to get a decent baseline.

 

I would say I am on par with other leveled trucks running 33" AT 10ply tires.

 

I get 16 mixed mpg, 20 highway with premium.

 

I get 13 mixed mpg, 15 highway with E85.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

 

 

 

Ha i figured it would be someone's on this board.

 

I was thinking you had the right idea with the oval muffler and then adding headers, so it didn't become overly loud like the round XR1s. I'm listening on good speakers now to see what i think i like.

 

Did you notice any MPG gain with the exhaust/headers/MIT/tune?

 

I noticed where you said you probably wouldn't go headers again, was the Dyno reading posted with a tune/headers/MIT/exhaust?

Here are gains from headers. Both were with done exhaust/MIT/tune, only addition was headers.

 

f5a7e51b5aba542a9f85a7cd70b02451.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Sorry my video quality sucks.

 

I honestly didn't leave the truck stock long enough to get a decent baseline.

 

I would say I am on par with other leveled trucks running 33" AT 10ply tires.

 

I get 16 mixed mpg, 20 highway with premium.

 

I get 13 mixed mpg, 15 highway with E85.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

Damn those aren't bad number by any means. Your premium numbers are around what i was getting stock. Combined 16 overall and 18ish on the highway give or take. With gas Now it's 13ish in town with pure gas, and this is trying to be conservative :(, I'll find out for sure next weekend what it's doing on the highway as i have to travel 330 miles to Finger, TN round trip. Willing to bet it's pretty bad.

 

I keep watching header videos and can't help but want them at the end of the day, especially if i go a similar route to your setup and it gives me the best of both worlds. I'd love to see a hard acceleration video if you could get one like Matt did.

Edited by 5RWill
  • Like 1
Posted

 

Ha i figured it would be someone's on this board.

 

I was thinking you had the right idea with the oval muffler and then adding headers, so it didn't become overly loud like the round XR1s. I'm listening on good speakers now to see what i think i like.

 

Did you notice any MPG gain with the exhaust/headers/MIT/tune?

 

I noticed where you said you probably wouldn't go headers again, was the Dyno reading posted with a tune/headers/MIT/exhaust?

 

5RWill, my truck has AR Headers with cats running the OE exhaust. It is quiet when cruising and has a nice growl when starting and accelerating. The headers took it from electric motor quiet to sounding like a sport truck. I tried both a Magnaflow and Corsa exhaust systems with headers and went back to the OE exhaust. I did have the flapper valve removed due to the substantial exhaust restriction it causes, even when open. With headers, the Magnaflow volume was too high for my taste and didn't care for the tone. The Corsa was just plain too damn loud. It was loud with manifolds and OE cats, but with headers the volume was about three times higher. I knew from the first start up that it was not going to work. Yes, those were both expensive lessons. My truck also has an MIT, ported throttle body and BlackBear tune. I really enjoy how it sounds. For me, it is a great combination. I know there is some HP loss with OE exhaust. At WOT (which my truck rarely sees) it has 5 lbs of backpressure which should equate to about 6 ~ 10 HP. Don't like it, but I can deal with it to have the sound both my wife and I like. Correction, she can live with it, I like it.

 

Did I notice any MPG gain? No, don't think so. On a nice road trip with the cruise set at 75 mph, I can get as high as 19.8 mpg. Driving 10 miles to work with some city driving it usually gets 15 ~ 17 mpg. I don't drive like an old lady, but not like a teenager either. Just moderate/aggressive.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Damn those aren't bad number by any means. You're premium numbers are around what i was getting stock. Combined 16 overall and 18ish on the highway give or take. With gas Now it's 13ish in town with pure gas, and this is trying to be conservative :(, I'll find out for sure next weekend what it's doing on the highway as i have to travel 330 miles to Finger, TN round trip. Willing to bet it's pretty bad.

 

I keep watching header videos and can't help but want them at the end of the day, especially if i go a similar route to your setup and it gives me the best of both worlds. I'd love to see a hard acceleration video if you could get one like Matt did.

 

I'll see what I can do for an acceleration video. I can do in cab no problem, but that doesn't do it justice. I'll have to find some empty road where I can put my cell down to record and hope that no one steals it :P.

Posted

 

5RWill, my truck has AR Headers with cats running the OE exhaust. It is quiet when cruising and has a nice growl when starting and accelerating. The headers took it from electric motor quiet to sounding like a sport truck. I tried both a Magnaflow and Corsa exhaust systems with headers and went back to the OE exhaust. I did have the flapper valve removed due to the substantial exhaust restriction it causes, even when open. With headers, the Magnaflow volume was too high for my taste and didn't care for the tone. The Corsa was just plain too damn loud. It was loud with manifolds and OE cats, but with headers the volume was about three times higher. I knew from the first start up that it was not going to work. Yes, those were both expensive lessons. My truck also has an MIT, ported throttle body and BlackBear tune. I really enjoy how it sounds. For me, it is a great combination. I know there is some HP loss with OE exhaust. At WOT (which my truck rarely sees) it has 5 lbs of backpressure which should equate to about 6 ~ 10 HP. Don't like it, but I can deal with it to have the sound both my wife and I like. Correction, she can live with it, I like it.

 

Did I notice any MPG gain? No, don't think so. On a nice road trip with the cruise set at 75 mph, I can get as high as 19.8 mpg. Driving 10 miles to work with some city driving it usually gets 15 ~ 17 mpg. I don't drive like an old lady, but not like a teenager either. Just moderate/aggressive.

 

This is well said.

 

I bet you would be happy with my setup. It has the best of both worlds as well, but just not as "tiny" as you get with the stock muffler.

 

If you want to explore or throw $100 more into your setup, cut out that OEM muffler and throw the Borla I have on in there and leave the resonator in place.

Posted

 

5RWill, my truck has AR Headers with cats running the OE exhaust. It is quiet when cruising and has a nice growl when starting and accelerating. The headers took it from electric motor quiet to sounding like a sport truck. I tried both a Magnaflow and Corsa exhaust systems with headers and went back to the OE exhaust. I did have the flapper valve removed due to the substantial exhaust restriction it causes, even when open. With headers, the Magnaflow volume was too high for my taste and didn't care for the tone. The Corsa was just plain too damn loud. It was loud with manifolds and OE cats, but with headers the volume was about three times higher. I knew from the first start up that it was not going to work. Yes, those were both expensive lessons. My truck also has an MIT, ported throttle body and BlackBear tune. I really enjoy how it sounds. For me, it is a great combination. I know there is some HP loss with OE exhaust. At WOT (which my truck rarely sees) it has 5 lbs of backpressure which should equate to about 6 ~ 10 HP. Don't like it, but I can deal with it to have the sound both my wife and I like. Correction, she can live with it, I like it.

 

Did I notice any MPG gain? No, don't think so. On a nice road trip with the cruise set at 75 mph, I can get as high as 19.8 mpg. Driving 10 miles to work with some city driving it usually gets 15 ~ 17 mpg. I don't drive like an old lady, but not like a teenager either. Just moderate/aggressive.

 

I think i'm going to do TSP headers and a similar muffler to Ryan. I'm glad i'm not the only one who thinks Corsa is just overbearingly loud. I do like the tone but i couldn't drive with that thing all day.

 

 

 

This is well said.

 

I bet you would be happy with my setup. It has the best of both worlds as well, but just not as "tiny" as you get with the stock muffler.

 

If you want to explore or throw $100 more into your setup, cut out that OEM muffler and throw the Borla I have on in there and leave the resonator in place.

 

 

So with the TSP headers and a catted Y-pipe i would just need a muffler and tip and could have someone put it all on and go? Or do i need to get a resonator as well? I do want split rear but i could wait for that.

Posted

Also are there any downsides to headers? Googling i saw mention of leaks and bolts backing off due to harmonics introduced in the engine bay.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...