Jump to content

LED Fog Bulbs & Lights


OUSux

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why change your lights at all if you are concerned with being too bright?? The stock are legal use those . I do a lot of driving on highways and road where there are no lights. This why I am changing mine.

  • Replies 637
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Why change your lights at all if you are concerned with being too bright?? The stock are legal use those . I do a lot of driving on highways and road where there are no lights. This why I am changing mine.

I do not like having halogen fogs, and I currently have HIDs in my fogs but am having trouble with them and getting a bit tired of dealing with them, so I feel like changing them to a high quality piece that if I needed to use them, would do some real work to help see

Posted

Mike,

I'm not sure if you're looking for a driving light or real fog light. If you're looking for foglights, take a look at the TRS Morimoto LED foglights. They are 3 1/2" diameter, 1200 lumen, with a flat cutoff.

Posted

Mike,

I'm not sure if you're looking for a driving light or real fog light. If you're looking for foglights, take a look at the TRS Morimoto LED foglights. They are 3 1/2" diameter, 1200 lumen, with a flat cutoff.

 

Neither of those kits are compatible with the 2014 sierra I thought? Was looking at those the other day

Posted

Mike,

It'd be a custom install. I've given some thought to them. I thought the easiest install would be to cut those tabs off the mount and slide it in the round ring of the Sierra fog mount, then use some spacers to center it in the Sierra ring and screw into the ring of the Morimoto mount. That Morimoto mount seems to have an adjusting screw in the back.

Posted

Mike,

It'd be a custom install. I've given some thought to them. I thought the easiest install would be to cut those tabs off the mount and slide it in the round ring of the Sierra fog mount, then use some spacers to center it in the Sierra ring and screw into the ring of the Morimoto mount. That Morimoto mount seems to have an adjusting screw in the back.

True, but honestly would rather something a bit brighter, my night sight isn't too great, especially with these OEM headlight projectors.

 

If I felt confident enough with doing a retrofit, I would do that and not really worry about my fogs and would likely just go the more "decorative" route like most people seemed to be going earlier in this thread.

Posted

Figured I should add these here too. These are the PIAA LP530 LED fog lights. These are true fog lights with a DOT legal beam pattern that can be left on all the time without bothering anybody. They're significantly brighter than stock and have a much better beam pattern with a lot more light to the sides of the vehicle. I wired them to come on with the side marker lamps so they're on any time the lights are "on" (not on with DRL's).

 

 

PICT0356.JPG

 

PICT0357.JPG

 

PICT0366.JPG

 

PICT0379.JPG

 

PICT0400.JPG

 

The Bracket I made:

 

PICT0419.JPG

 

PICT0421.JPG

 

Simply snaps right into place:

 

PICT0438.JPG

Posted

Jon,

You can't just say "the bracket I made" and leave it at that. That looks like some serious effort. Let's hear some about it.

Posted

Jon,

You can't just say "the bracket I made" and leave it at that. That looks like some serious effort. Let's hear some about it.

exact same thing i thought!

Posted

+ 2 on the bracket! Maybe even some specs on the light output and night shots. Looks like It would be very effective.

Posted

Thanks guys. The bracket was a fair amount of effort and not cheap, but I felt like doing it. Every now and then I get inspired and can't stop until it's done. It's plastic but very sturdy. Now that all the work is done, if anybody else wants a pair just let me know and I can get you some. Like I said, they aren't cheap but I know easy snap on installation and OEM look is probably worth it to some.

 

Anyway, here's a beam pattern comparison between these and the stock fogs:

 

IMG_20140314_242413_608.jpg

 

IMG_20140314_242430_046.jpg

 

IMG_20140314_242510_569.jpg

 

The biggest improvement over stock in the pattern is how thick it is way out to the sides. The stock beam pattern gets very thin to the sides so it's not lighting much up out there.

 

Though as I mentioned in the other thread, if you aren't going to do a lightbar or similar to augment your brights, you may want to do the LP 530 Driving lights instead and wire them to come on with your brights. I feel the brights need more help on these GMC's than the dims.

 

 

Posted

Thanks guys. The bracket was a fair amount of effort and not cheap, but I felt like doing it. Every now and then I get inspired and can't stop until it's done. It's plastic but very sturdy. Now that all the work is done, if anybody else wants a pair just let me know and I can get you some. Like I said, they aren't cheap but I know easy snap on installation and OEM look is probably worth it to some.

 

Anyway, here's a beam pattern comparison between these and the stock fogs:

 

IMG_20140314_242413_608.jpg

 

IMG_20140314_242430_046.jpg

 

IMG_20140314_242510_569.jpg

 

The biggest improvement over stock in the pattern is how thick it is way out to the sides. The stock beam pattern gets very thin to the sides so it's not lighting much up out there.

 

Though as I mentioned in the other thread, if you aren't going to do a lightbar or similar to augment your brights, you may want to do the LP 530 Driving lights instead and wire them to come on with your brights. I feel the brights need more help on these GMC's than the dims.

 

 

 

How much would it cost? Just curious! Keeping the OEM look, getting a better light, no major modifications needed. Oh hell yea!

 

 

Also how does the color do compared to the LED DRLs? Just curious cause I know sometimes pictures don't do much justice.

Posted

Those PIAA LED fogs would be perfect but I need that bracket. I also like the Hella LED fog lamps but there would also be some type of fabrication required. Has anyone on here tried these Hella's in the stock location? The Hella's are my 1st choice but The Putco are the only ones so far without any fab required. I also checked the the Putco are also a true fog pattern like the PIAA and Hella.

http://www.myhellalights.com/index.php/default/optilux/optilux-4-led-fog-lamp-kit/

http://www.kbcarstuff.com/putco-luminix-high-power-led-fog-lights-sil-p/12002-sil.htm

Posted
Standard Headlights and Fogs

image

Just Fogs

photo 1

Highbeams

photo 2

Rough Country LED Fogs Only

photo 3

Standard Headlights Only

photo 4

Both RC LED Fogs and Standard Headlights

photo 5

 

 

Overall I am very happy with these LED Fogs from Rough Country. The pictures honestly do not do these fogs justice. They are very bright and I feel like i could drive around with just them on at night. They have a very wide beam but do not shine to high where I am blinding other drivers. I had my father drive towards me on our street and he was not blinded by them and then i drove behind him and again he was not blinded by them.

 

Next on the list is HIDs

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,924
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    KirbyCo
    Newest Member
    KirbyCo
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,482 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I will be doing that for sure, but I need to solve who has/ where I can find a bidirectional scan tool that will support OBD 1.5. I'm kicking myself because I ebay'ed a Snap On MT2500 that I didn't think I'd ever need anymore. D'oh!! I'd rather not buy another, so I'll contact a few local shops to see if they have one and how much they'd want to do the procedure. I'd rather have the ability to do it myself... I wish there was a modern tool that could do it all, but I'd have no idea what to buy.   The theory with the pulled timing is that it mimics a rich condition. The delayed spark causes incomplete burn and the O2 sensor picks up low oxygen levels. That's interpreted as a rich condition so the PCM pulls fuel and that shows up in the deeply negative fuel trims.
    • An ultra wealthy man had the most beautiful daughter. But, there was a problem. Everything she touched would melt in her hands. No matter what, Metal, Wood, Stone. Anything she touched would melt. She could not feed herself. Because of this, men were afraid of her. Nobody would dare marry her. Her father was despaired. What could he do to help his daughter? He consulted doctors, scientists and anybody who could solve this problem. Finally one of them said, "If your daughter touches one thing that does not melt in her hands, she will be cured." He was overjoyed and came up with a plan. The next day, he held a competition. Any man who could bring his daughter an object that would not melt in her hands would be given billions of dollars to marry her. Three extremely intelligent and handsome young men took up the challenge. The first brought a very heavy steel rod, But alas, when the she touched it, it completely melted in a matter of seconds. He sadly went away. The second brought a beautiful diamond, knowing diamonds were one of the hardest substance in the world and would not melt. But alas, once she held it in her hand, it melted. He too was sent away disappointed. So now, there was one left He was very nervous & sweating. He approached the daughter & said, “put your hand in my pants pocket and feel what is in there." She did exactly what he asked. She felt something very hard. She held it in her hand, squeezing it as hard as she could. It did not melt & remained extremely hard. Her father was overjoyed. Everybody was overjoyed. She was finally cured. Nothing never, ever melted in her hand again. They married and they both lived happily ever after, raising a wonderful family. Question: What was in the the groom’s pants pocket??? Answer below ↓ M&Ms of course! They melt in your mouth, not in your hand. What on earth were you thinking?
    • There's a bunch of tea leaves that you've read, but in any case the delayed timing is unusual. Not sure how that relates to the rich at idle vs. 'normal' while driving.   If you're in this deep, might be worth investigating, and re-learning the sensor. What have you got to lose? Plus, it properly fixes the timing cover leak.
    • The only problem I have seen this cause is longer crank times. 
    • Injector is being sent off today for rebuild and I estimate I'll have it back in 10 days or so.   It may not be the injector...of course...now that I've torn down the intake again. But, let's rule out the injector and replace those spider legs that have been almost rubbed through.   The truck has always had negative timing and I'm reading "normal" timing at warm idle should be +16 or so. I'm negative 16 to 25 or more, and it's always been like that since I bought it.   A light turned on upstairs last night in the old noggin. Rare, I know...   This will be wild, if it turns out to be the cause!   In 2001, according to the old service documentation, the muffler was replaced. Why? I have no idea, it wouldn't have been rusted through by then. But they did a crappy job.   In 2019, another shop replaced it and noted the prior install was poorly done on the work order. "Exhaust system vibrates on crossmember". Except...I guess they just left it be? I believe the husband, the couple who were original owners, had passed by then. Maybe she said it's just not worth it to have the exhaust system fixed and declined repairs. Very few miles were driven between 2019 and 2025.   The exhaust system vibrates heavily on the crossmember and you can feel it and REALLY hear it, even today. Not always, but at idle, it gets going pretty good sometimes.   What if....   ....What if that's enough to trigger one or both of the knock sensors? Could it be tricking the sensors into sensing knock, so it's pulling timing aggressively? Pulling timing heavily means it's firing after the piston reaches full height which means incomplete burn which means the O2 sensor is sensing a rich condition, which means I've been chasing my tail, and what I thought was an inconsequential problem (janky exhaust) has been THE issue for this truck for 25 solid years?   That would be wild. Maybe it IS wild.   The service documentation thereafter, for years, shows visits for rough idle, replacing O2's, replacing the cat, replacing plugs and wires, a misfire condition, like they could never solve the issue. The injector has been replaced 4 times in 80k miles, that's just crazy.   The secondary theory....   The engine has clearly had a leak at the front seal for a very long time (the greasy trench...). I think the truck changed hands quickly ~2025 because there's Napa receipts from someone I don't recognize in the ownership history. They apparently replaced the timing cover seal, and they did a terrible job. There's RTV smeared all over and the leak I had reduced to a weep by snugging the front oil pan bolts is now a leak again.   HOWEVER....I read about replacing the crankshaft position sensor. Any time the ckp sensor is disturbed or timing cover is removed, the truck requires relearning, and that can only be done through a bi-directional scan tool. Skippy with the RTV probably didn't do the relearn procedure is my guess. His scan tool is lost in a pile of RTV goo somewhere.   So, it's very possible the sensor has been disturbed and the truck is just running on the old learn data but not setting a code for anything. The distributor has since been replaced and so has the camshaft position sensor, so all bets are off for that thing.   In the theme of one step forward, two steps back, I returned the accumulator for the AC. The gal I've been working with at O'Really's has been great. She refunded it under manufacturer's defect and we compared it to the replacement I ordered, and sure enough, the replacement is machined very differently (and a gauge actually fits on it!).   Got it home, installed it, started vacuuming it down.... and I couldn't get good vacuum.   The high side service port, where I replaced the old GM ball valve suspecting that was a source of the previous leak....well, I've clearly exposed whatever pre-existing crack in the line where the service port is welded, and made it much worse. Blessing in disguise? Except there goes another $25, now I'm waiting for a replacement AC line.   In 10-ish days ALL the parts will be here. Rebuilt injector, new exhaust system, new cat, new high pressure AC line.   Oh, did I mention the squeaking ISN'T coming from the AC pump? The truck still squeaks when started, and there were words after I started it with the new AC pump installed. But, there was more to replacing the AC pump for just a squeak. A truck with good working AC is something of value, for the comfort alone.   I've ordered a new harmonic balancer because, 30 years is a good run for one of those. Rule it out. The squeak may be something more sinister, though. I'm worried about that ckp sensor and if it was shimmed correctly, or if the timing set was installed correctly. The squeak may be coming from UNDER the timing cover.   At this point, once I get it put back together, I'm thinking I'll take a 50 mile victory lap and then promptly put it up for sale. This truck is cursed. Betty, from beyond the grave, doesn't want anyone messing with her Blazer. Or maybe she's getting revenge for 30 years of shop visits with that thing.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...