Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Holy heck! Do you get spindles with that kit and did you add rear spacers? I have 20x10 -19 on back order and I may hafta rethink this with my 33 12.50's. Truck looks great but that won't fly around here with the law. Thanks!

 

Yes, the kit came with knuckles. I think they installed rear spacers, but not 100% sure.

Posted

Holy heck! Do you get spindles with that kit and did you add rear spacers? I have 20x10 -19 on back order and I may hafta rethink this with my 33 12.50's. Truck looks great but that won't fly around here with the law. Thanks!

It ought to be the LAW everywhere.... These stupid rednecks around here have wheels hanging out of the fender wells slinging mud, rocks and every damn thing else all over the vehicle behind them chipping windshields, paint chips. Sorry for the rant!

 

RT

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It ought to be the LAW everywhere.... These stupid rednecks around here have wheels hanging out of the fender wells slinging mud, rocks and every damn thing else all over the vehicle behind them chipping windshields, paint chips. Sorry for the rant!

 

RT

 

Haven't had that problem even though it's plenty of trucks with tires that stick out. I did get a chipped windshield that turned into a crack on my current truck, but it was while I was on the interstate behind an 18 wheeler that was a lowboy trailer and he was too lazy to do a quick sweep. I wasn't even directly behind him, I was in the passing lane and as I started to pass him I got hit by a lot and surprised only got the one chip. I don't think tires that stick out on a pickup is a big issue on asphalt, at least with my experience the past 14 years.

Edited by SouthernSilveradoGuy85
Posted

2.5 RC level front only, 1.5 Zone BL, American Outlaw Regulators 17x9 +10 offset and Nitto Terra Grappler G2's in 285/75. Just swapped from stock wheels today. Went from very minor rub on left front in reverse at full left lock on the wheel well liner to a greater rub at left lock in forward and reverse. Try to fix it in the morning with zip ties, couldn't see the greatest in the dark, but still appears and sounds to be the liner.

post-147573-0-03593700-1460695663_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-82359600-1460695693_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-54211600-1460695709_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-03593700-1460695663_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-82359600-1460695693_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-54211600-1460695709_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-03593700-1460695663_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-82359600-1460695693_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-54211600-1460695709_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-03593700-1460695663_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-82359600-1460695693_thumb.jpeg

post-147573-0-54211600-1460695709_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Finally made a decision on a new set of tires. I compared every A/T on the market in the 265/70R18 in Standard Load. A lot of thought went into this purchase. I wanted to stay with SL due to ride quality and weight. I don't need a LT 10 ply tire on my truck.

 

In the end the new Falken Wildpeak AT3W won out over the Nitto G2, Toyo A/T2, Grabber A/T2, and the BFG Rugged Terrain. I created a spreadsheet that compared weight, tread depth, warranty, overall size, severe weather rating, etc.

 

Chose the AT3W b/c it has 14/32" tread depth, severe weather rated, nice side wall lugs, nice tread gaps, 55k warranty, weight is only 8lbs more than stock, and price.

 

Got these at a local shop for $750 installed including mount and balance with road hazard warranty and tax.504184ff5900fe1338710a57a91cb3d9.jpg4a3ba033f7307f6f271f9eac4894fe76.jpg5dde1159aaad2686fc151874c53d5696.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Posted

Finally made a decision on a new set of tires. I compared every A/T on the market in the 265/70R18 in Standard Load. A lot of thought went into this purchase. I wanted to stay with SL due to ride quality and weight. I don't need a LT 10 ply tire on my truck.

 

In the end the new Falken Wildpeak AT3W won out over the Nitto G2, Toyo A/T2, Grabber A/T2, and the BFG Rugged Terrain. I created a spreadsheet that compared weight, tread depth, warranty, overall size, severe weather rating, etc.

 

Chose the AT3W b/c it has 14/32" tread depth, severe weather rated, nice side wall lugs, nice tread gaps, 55k warranty, weight is only 8lbs more than stock, and price.

 

Got these at a local shop for $750 installed including mount and balance with road hazard warranty and tax.

Those look really nice! I'm not familiar with AT3W. I'll have to check them out!

Posted

Those look really nice! I'm not familiar with AT3W. I'll have to check them out!

They were just released in Feb 2016. They are replacing the Wildpeak AT

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

They were just released in Feb 2016. They are replacing the Wildpeak AT

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I'm glad to hear the old AT has been replaced, I had them on my 07 and they were like fred flinstone tires.

Posted (edited)

2.5 RC level front only, 1.5 Zone BL, American Outlaw Regulators 17x9 +10 offset and Nitto Terra Grappler G2's in 285/75. Just swapped from stock wheels today. Went from very minor rub on left front in reverse at full left lock on the wheel well liner to a greater rub at left lock in forward and reverse. Try to fix it in the morning with zip ties, couldn't see the greatest in the dark, but still appears and sounds to be the liner.

 

That's interesting that you pushed your rim out only .5" (+24 to +10) and the rubbing got worse with a relatively narrow tire on 4" total front lift. It's hard to figure out what fits and don't fit on these trucks.

Edited by bcbz71
Posted

That's interesting that you pushed your rim out only .5" (+24 to +10) and the rubbing got worse with a relatively narrow tire on 4" total front lift. It's hard to figure out what fits and don't fit on these trucks.

I agree wasn't completely expecting that, but then again not surprised either. So many trucks with so many little differences. Still even seems odd to me how much difference from left to right side. Either way it's all good now got liner pulled back and rubbing gone.

Posted

Finally made a decision on a new set of tires. I compared every A/T on the market in the 265/70R18 in Standard Load. A lot of thought went into this purchase. I wanted to stay with SL due to ride quality and weight. I don't need a LT 10 ply tire on my truck.

 

In the end the new Falken Wildpeak AT3W won out over the Nitto G2, Toyo A/T2, Grabber A/T2, and the BFG Rugged Terrain. I created a spreadsheet that compared weight, tread depth, warranty, overall size, severe weather rating, etc.

 

Chose the AT3W b/c it has 14/32" tread depth, severe weather rated, nice side wall lugs, nice tread gaps, 55k warranty, weight is only 8lbs more than stock, and price.

 

Got these at a local shop for $750 installed including mount and balance with road hazard warranty and tax.504184ff5900fe1338710a57a91cb3d9.jpg4a3ba033f7307f6f271f9eac4894fe76.jpg5dde1159aaad2686fc151874c53d5696.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Did you check out cooper ?

 

sent from Florida beech

Posted

Did you check out cooper ?

 

sent from Florida beech

Yes, I looked at everything on the market. I liked the ST Maxx, but I did not want to go into the LT weights. The AT3 is nice and has good reviews, but the sidewall just looks too plain for my taste.

Posted

Yes, I looked at everything on the market. I liked the ST Maxx, but I did not want to go into the LT weights. The AT3 is nice and has good reviews, but the sidewall just looks too plain for my taste.

I think it's the discover cooper I like

 

sent from Florida beech

Posted

(Before) 2.5" leveling kit

post-143838-0-97458400-1460909873_thumb.jpg

 

 

(After) 6.5" zone lift, Toyo Open Countrys 35x12.5x20 on stock 20"s, no spacers and at full lock both ways in forward or reverse no rubbbing AT ALL!! Also i just put a flowmaster 40 on myself!!

post-143838-0-90380300-1460909507_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-90380300-1460909507_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-97458400-1460909873_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-90380300-1460909507_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-97458400-1460909873_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-90380300-1460909507_thumb.jpg

post-143838-0-97458400-1460909873_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...