Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Any rubbing?? And what size lift??

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In reverse if im backing down a hill, not at all in forward. I have a 4" lift.

I think if you go with a zero offset or closer to factory it wouldnt rub at all. I went with -12 because of the fender flares.

Posted

In reverse if im backing down a hill, not at all in forward. I have a 4" lift.

I think if you go with a zero offset or closer to factory it wouldnt rub at all. I went with -12 because of the fender flares.

Gotcha I currently only have a 2.5 level kit with 34x11.5 tires on the stocks 17 wheels and was looking to go with 17x9 with -12 offset but was pretty sure I would rub like hell... now I know I will lol

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

My full size spare with Cooper STT Pro, white letters out.

 

Let me know thoughts on the white letters out, I like it. As soon as I have some extra funds, I plan to put Cooper STT Pros all around.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Really sharp looking tires, but in my opinion the white letters take away from the appearance. I totally respect your choice and your truck will look great either way!

  • Like 1
Posted

My full size spare with Cooper STT Pro, white letters out.

 

Let me know thoughts on the white letters out, I like it. As soon as I have some extra funds, I plan to put Cooper STT Pros all around.

 

04bcdb03420eb61f6d1de6fd40fdf4d3.jpg

 

2fe4b84179e938cee3d509a68646424f.jpg

 

5fb8f49dfc7bb24f2e969ffc5349dfdd.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

White letters out! Absolutely!

that looks killer!

  • Like 1
Posted

White letters out! Absolutely!

that looks killer!

I agree. I have the same tires and was hoping id get the white letters since i have a white truck, but i didnt get so lucky....

 

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Recently got the opportunity to hook up with MRR Wheels and got a chance to try out their newest wheel. Been waiting since July to get them,definitely worth the wait [emoji1417]

MRR T228

22x10 ET30

305/40/22

4/7 Drop

 

430718eeeb744224ba03c61c08da1bae.jpg

c911e326a8bda10fe2b3c5933f4f1553.jpg

 

Any rubbing or anything?

Posted (edited)

 

Any rubbing or anything?

With 305's in the front yea but only when in full lock

Edited by bakerrr
Posted

80dcf2ec15737586872c0d342f98cb83.jpg0b2656eae1761e121a986eab80b8c55f.jpg

 

18x9 -12 offset wheels with 34x12.50 BFG KO2

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Looks great, i'm running 4.5" of lift and the same size rims and offset, What made you decide to go with the 34x12.50 over the 305 65 they're almost identical in size and price? I'm looking at both for my next set of tires but it seems like the 305 65 is more readily available and the 34's have to be ordered.

Posted (edited)

Looks great, i'm running 4.5" of lift and the same size rims and offset, What made you decide to go with the 34x12.50 over the 305 65 they're almost identical in size and price? I'm looking at both for my next set of tires but it seems like the 305 65 is more readily available and the 34's have to be ordered.

You're right, its only a half inch taller and wider which is nothing, but Discount tire near me had the 34x12.50 in stock plus the 34's are KO2's and the 305's were the KO and I prefer the sidewall of the KO2's. I wanted it to be as wide as i could any way, because of the fender flares. You cant go wrong with either tire.

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Edited by MrNasty
Posted

You're right, its only a half inch taller and wider which is nothing, but Discount tire near me had the 34x12.50 in stock plus the 34's are KO2's and the 305's were the KO and I prefer the sidewall of the KO2's. I wanted it to be as wide as i could any way, because of the fender flares. You cant go wrong with either tire.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Actually on BFG's website they are both 33.5" even though they call it a 34, the 305 is 12.2" wide and 12.5" for the 34x12.50. I'm not sure why BFG makes 2 tires so close in sizes. The 305 has a higher load rating at a higher max pressure of 80 psi, max on the 34 is 65 psi. Now you can't find any of this info on their website they have everything all screwed up on there.

Posted

Anyone know the biggest size I could fit with a fabtech 3" front 2" rear with stock 20x9 +27 rims? Think I currently have 275/55/r20. Want something big and aggressive.

Posted

Actually on BFG's website they are both 33.5" even though they call it a 34, the 305 is 12.2" wide and 12.5" for the 34x12.50. I'm not sure why BFG makes 2 tires so close in sizes. The 305 has a higher load rating at a higher max pressure of 80 psi, max on the 34 is 65 psi. Now you can't find any of this info on their website they have everything all screwed up on there.

Oh ok, i didnt look at BFG. Then pretty much no difference. So just comes down to whats available I guess. I dont tow a lot with the 1500, I have a Duramax for the heavy work but for guys that do tow then the 305 would be the way to go for sure.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

Anyone know the biggest size I could fit with a fabtech 3" front 2" rear with stock 20x9 +27 rims? Think I currently have 275/55/r20. Want something big and aggressive.

With the stock offset you can fit pretty big tires. I have seen some post's where guys ran 35's with factory wheels. He said no rubbing, so can probably get 33's or 34's on it with room to spare. I will find out soon as my wife wants some with more grip on her 2015. The guys at the tire shop I use will let use try a couple of sizes to see what fits without rubbing so maybe a shop near you will do the same.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

With the stock offset you can fit pretty big tires. I have seen some post's where guys ran 35's with factory wheels. He said no rubbing, so can probably get 33's or 34's on it with room to spare. I will find out soon as my wife wants some with more grip on her 2015. The guys at the tire shop I use will let use try a couple of sizes to see what fits without rubbing so maybe a shop near you will do the same.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That would be great!

I found these mud hog tires for around $800 for the set so pretty cheap for 275/65/20. Thunk those would be 34s. Would love to fit 35s tho!

Look at this on eBay http://www.ebay.com/itm/262217845925

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,667 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...