Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here are mine:

2" RC level

20x9 OE wheels machined black. +31 offset

275/60/20 Falken Wild Peak AT

No Rubbing or trimming

 

 

IMG_7970_zpsede8df48.jpg

 

IMG_7952_zps800d6812.jpg

 

IMG_7969_zpsd98b6f49.jpg

Pretty much what I'm about to do.

 

Just found this site, way more info than i could have asked for in here.

 

I was going to try to fit the 275/60/20 AT3/Ws without a leveling kit, but I'm sold on running the leveling kit now.

 

69ab2e89f9d2d4891452e2fe583c6d9e.jpga42bcddcdbea045bef67c669dd9e4e60.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Pretty much what I'm about to do.

 

Just found this site, way more info than i could have asked for in here.

 

I was going to try to fit the 275/60/20 AT3/Ws without a leveling kit, but I'm sold on running the leveling kit now.

 

69ab2e89f9d2d4891452e2fe583c6d9e.jpga42bcddcdbea045bef67c669dd9e4e60.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Is that just a 2" rc in the front ? Stock on the rear ?
Posted

Pretty much what I'm about to do.

 

Just found this site, way more info than i could have asked for in here.

 

I was going to try to fit the 275/60/20 AT3/Ws without a leveling kit, but I'm sold on running the leveling kit now.

 

69ab2e89f9d2d4891452e2fe583c6d9e.jpga42bcddcdbea045bef67c669dd9e4e60.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

275/65-20... +16 offset makes it fit puuuuurfectly

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Is that just a 2" rc in the front ? Stock on the rear ?

My truck is completely stock at this time. I am going to do a RC 2" and Falken 275/60/20 AT3/W tire

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Posted

275/65-20... +16 offset makes it fit puuuuurfectly

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

For whatever reason i can't find the 275/65/20 for sale on Discount Tire's site. See what they say when i stop in the store. Just gotta work this extra OT for a couple weeks first.

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Posted

2016 Silverado

2 1/4" Front Level Only

OEM GMC All Terrain Rims, Plasti dipped black with Glossifier

Midnight Edition Center Caps

275/60/20 BF KO2's

Zero Rub, Perfect Fit

IMG_3343.jpgIMG_3344.jpgIMG_3342.jpgIMG_3345.jpg

Out of curiosity, could you have run that tire without the leveling kit?

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Posted

My truck is completely stock at this time. I am going to do a RC 2" and Falken 275/60/20 AT3/W tire

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Those new falken at3's look sick

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Out of curiosity, could you have run that tire without the leveling kit?

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

Not 100% sure but I wanna maybe? Have to spend hours searching on here

Posted

For whatever reason i can't find the 275/65/20 for sale on Discount Tire's site. See what they say when i stop in the store. Just gotta work this extra OT for a couple weeks first.

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

keep looking! I got mine on tire rack. Bfg ko2

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I was looking to tone down the chrome on my denali and preferred to stick with an OEM wheel. I really liked the looks of the black 22" wheel but preferred a 20" wheel for several reasons. I ended up getting the 20x9 Black Rhino "Peak" wheel which looked very similar and was able to use my stock center caps. They are 20mm offset and I kept the 1/4" spacer plates on the front after changing the stock wheels but don't it was needed. The factory center caps are larger than the Black rhino's (+/- 3/8" larger) and don't sit in the recess but they snap in with a little extra force and are very snug. I was pleasantly surprised that they fit.

20160921 065451

20160921 065437

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 

Not 100% sure but I wanna maybe? Have to spend hours searching on here

you can run 275/60/20 without a level

on stock wheels

Edited by tyrich88
Posted (edited)

RC 2.5inch with rear blocks is going on today, tires tomorrow. Gonna test fit the 275/65r20s and the 305/55r20 Ko2s. I've read that 275/65r20 will rub slightly but a little trim or pulling back fender liner will solve this, but worry that and change in driving conditions will shove the tire straight into the well. The 305/55r20 I've heard fits no problem. Just worried that it won't be a noticeable difference from stock tire.

Edited by 16_sierra
  • Like 2
Posted

So I have looked through 30+ pages of this thread and I am still as undecided as ever as to which direction I'm going to go. I have a 2014 Denali 1500 with a RC 2.5" level kit and I'm wanting to go from stock wheels and rims to a 20x9 or 10 with a 33"-34" BF Goodrich AT tire. I am wanting to keep the setup as flush as possible with the aggressive look still. Would a 305 55 20 with a 20x9 stick out of the fender a huge amount and if not which offset would I need? I know a 276 60/65 20 is the popular size but I think it looks very tall and narrow from what I've seen.

Posted

So I have looked through 30+ pages of this thread and I am still as undecided as ever as to which direction I'm going to go. I have a 2014 Denali 1500 with a RC 2.5" level kit and I'm wanting to go from stock wheels and rims to a 20x9 or 10 with a 33"-34" BF Goodrich AT tire. I am wanting to keep the setup as flush as possible with the aggressive look still. Would a 305 55 20 with a 20x9 stick out of the fender a huge amount and if not which offset would I need? I know a 276 60/65 20 is the popular size but I think it looks very tall and narrow from what I've seen.

you need an offset as close to factory as possible to sit nice and flush. Here's a pick of my old truck with 305/55r20's on factory wheelsf906ab8fc81240a3a68ec704452e7c9d.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Posted

RC 2.5inch with rear blocks is going on today, tires tomorrow. Gonna test fit the 275/65r20s and the 305/55r20 Ko2s. I've read that 275/65r20 will rub slightly but a little trim or pulling back fender liner will solve this, but worry that and change in driving conditions will shove the tire straight into the well. The 305/55r20 I've heard fits no problem. Just worried that it won't be a noticeable difference from stock tire.

I assume that the 275/65 could run depending on your offset or if the tires run large (I have bfg ko2). I still have zero signs of rubbing after 2500 miles.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...