Jump to content

Removal of Front Air Dam

Luster
 Share

Recommended Posts

Luster Senior Enthusiast

Luster

Posted
Posted

First, what is the purpose of the air dam?

 

Second, how does removal affect air flow, engine heat, gas mileage, etc.?

Silverado-Hareek Senior Enthusiast

Silverado-Hareek

Posted
Posted (edited)

The air dam is designed to divert air around and under the truck reducing drag and increasing MPG's. The design on these trucks is modeled after the aerodynamics engineered on the Corvette. The downside is that it's in the way if you go off-roading and other instances where you need clearance. Removing it only affects your fuel economy because of more wind resistance and will not harm the truck in any way.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
  • Like 1
Luster Senior Enthusiast

Luster

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The air dam is designed to divert air around and under the truck reducing drag and increasing MPG's. The design on these trucks is modeled after the aerodynamics engineered on the Corvette. The downside is that it's in the way if you go off-roading and other instances where you need clearance. Removing it only affects your fuel economy because of more wind resistance and will not harm the truck in any way.

Thanks! (and it looks better off!)

bdbake01 Senior Enthusiast

bdbake01

Posted
Posted

Technically it's around and over, not under.

 

Either way, just mileage.

Silverado-Hareek Senior Enthusiast

Silverado-Hareek

Posted
Posted (edited)

Technically it's around and over, not under.

 

Either way, just mileage.

It's under too. Look at the angle of the center of the lower bumper. Also look at the air dam and how it changes shape as you move from the outside edge to the center. these angles and contours are designed to divert the air that does not go over the truck under the truck through the center away from the tires. Edited by Silverado-Hareek
fondupot Senior Enthusiast

fondupot

Posted
Posted

Been meaning to remove mine. Looks way better with it off.

 

Maybe after I have my Blackbear tune installed for a while.

GMC-AT Senior Enthusiast

GMC-AT

Posted
Posted

you're going the loose about .5 MPG... maybe more. Same as if you level the front end.. when I did that.. I lost about 1 mpg.

bdbake01 Senior Enthusiast

bdbake01

Posted
Posted

I stand corrected it's designed to direct the air to the ground away from the underbody. Guess I misunderstood the explanation I got on this previously.

http://www.equipmentworld.com/dont-lower-your-tailgate-gm-details-aerodynamic-design-of-2014-silverado-and-sierra-2500-debunks-myths/

Think about it like this. The underbody is all kinda chopped up with tons of stuff to present drag, or resistance to the flow of air. Any air that gets under there will try to slow down the truck. If you can divert this up or over, then the top and/or sides of the truck are waaaaay more slippery and will, therefore, reduce drag. This is why sports car designers want the body as low as possible and the underbelly to be as smooth as possible.

  • Like 2
Silverado-Hareek Senior Enthusiast

Silverado-Hareek

Posted
Posted

Think about it like this. The underbody is all kinda chopped up with tons of stuff to present drag, or resistance to the flow of air. Any air that gets under there will try to slow down the truck. If you can divert this up or over, then the top and/or sides of the truck are waaaaay more slippery and will, therefore, reduce drag. This is why sports car designers want the body as low as possible and the underbelly to be as smooth as possible.

 

Yeah that definitely makes sense the more I think about it after reading that article.

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

you're going the loose about .5 MPG... maybe more. Same as if you level the front end.. when I did that.. I lost about 1 mpg.

 

Main reason I lowered the rear instead, didn't want to give up mileage for the leveled look when I knew I would never run any tires larger than stock.

MikeNH Senior Enthusiast

MikeNH

Posted
Posted

Been off my 2011 since the first weekend I had it. Only reason it took that long as on a Monday night I picked up the truck and Tuesday I left for a work trip that took the remainder of the week. Obviously I can't speak for a mileage loss as I had maybe 200 miles on it by then but whatever the trade off its worth it. Stupid thing hung down so low and these new ones are worse.

kstruckcountry Senior Enthusiast

kstruckcountry

Posted
Posted

I took it off on my 2006. Bumper went with it. Put a 150 pound piece of steel on the front. Mileage stayed the same. :lol:

 

IMO the dam on the 2014's looks bad. It's a pickup for Pete's sake, an Outback has more clearance. I have seen a couple pickups bottomed out on the dam on curbs, which is ridiculous.

GMC-AT Senior Enthusiast

GMC-AT

Posted
Posted

I agree... but all manufacturers have pressure to get the highest MPG... by both the customer and government. GM loves to advertise that their truck get's 1 mpg better than ford. Personally I could care less.. but I think many people do.

 

Unfortunately better aero (like air dams dragging the ground) and weight reduction is the easiest way to increase MPG.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • newdude
      Bent valve in 2025 GMC Canyon Denali - Requires engine swap at 14K miles

      By newdude · Posted

      No ETA is available for that engine at the moment in the GM system.   I would start at the dealer.  Try and talk to the parts manager or service manager and see if they can start a CX Connect case and get an ETA from GM on when engines may be available.  If they just check Parts Workbench and say "no eta", they aren't trying hard enough.  They need to do a CX Connect and chat with DPAC to find the ETA.      
    • Chuck FB
      MPG at 600 miles

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I would have to read back to get a better picture in my mind of some of the other comments and what they were using for a driving scenario they based the fuel mileage off of. That is why the fuel mileage conversation is extremely difficult to make fair comparisons from. If I was to be living in town and only driving around town, light to light and some longer stretches that doesn't have a light every block, and the usual stop at a grocery store and the bank and so on and so forth, my fuel mileage even during the summer time would be so bad with my truck I don't even want to know how bad it would be !. Then add in winter time and idling to warm it up to clear the windows and driving through snowy streets etc, large heavy trucks with gas engines have NEVER been worth crap for fuel mileage and why some little pot licker of a car with wheelbarrow tires and a 1300 cc four cylinder non turbo engine was the ticket to using a mere fraction of the fuel over a full size pickup.    By the way my truck has the 34" tires as its a HC but not the BFG KO3 tires ( that was an option for my truck but the sales guy couldn't figure out what the tires actually were so that never got on the order until it was too late to change the truck order ). So what fuel mileage your getting actually sounds good for "town driving" and with my truck when I go to town the fuel mileage keeps increasing as I get closer to town because it takes quite a while to get the driveline oils warmed up ( and why it always shows better fuel mileage on the return trip from town because its already warmed up ) but once I am in town that fuel mileage average just keeps dropping the more I mess around town and then has to recover back to something reasonable again by the time I get home for an over all average.    I'd be curious what your sticker says for the factory weight of your truck, mine is close around that 7700 lb due to the options it has. But anyway the long and short is, vehicle weight, higher rolling resistance heavy tires and a hefty driveline and a relatively large gas engine make for crap fuel mileage in stop and go scenarios, all one can do is drive it easy off the line at each stop and as my dad had said over the years, drive like a raw egg is under your foot and that's the best one can do. Years back with a carbed engine and if the carb was getting a bit out of tune etc as would the ignition system, the fuel mileage on pickups with larger engines was just awful compared to what your getting. We pay the fuel price penalty for driving HD trucks over some little vehicle, that is the reality. 
    • diyer2
      Navigating senior years.

      By diyer2 · Posted

      Speedy recovery.
    • KARNUT
      Slate Electric Truck

      By KARNUT · Posted

      We had two Toyota’s with that engine in the mid 80s. We had 50 gallon fuel tanks, a toolbox full of tools, an air compressor and assorted parts for our equipment. We beat those up and down pipeline ROWs until we started buying diesel trucks. Then they became parts runners and first vehicles for our teenagers first cars. Our shop Forman wrecked them both two years apart when we hired him out of high school as an apprentice. Good thing he’s an excellent mechanic. It took awhile before he could be called a good driver.
    • diyer2
      Gas Prices

      By diyer2 · Posted

      $4.26 85 oct 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...