Jump to content

How is your 4.3L EcoTec3 V6 Engine working out for ya?

The4thgearkid
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

corwest
corwest

Couldn't be more true. Most people who speak poorly of things on forums go searching for a place to speak that way. It's very rare you find people who are completely satisfied who go looking for a pla

Brian S.
Brian S.

I had the 4.3l with 4wd/3.42 gears Xcab last year, now have the 5.3l with 4wd/3.42 gears Xcab and agree with what you say.   In normal driving, the 4.3 and 5.3 drive largely the same. The difference

KARNUT
KARNUT

Unlike getting the 6.2 you can get the 5.3 across the board with very little upgrade cost. Then you factor in the added HP can go up to 380 on e-85 it's a no brainier. I have nothing against V6s I hav

Posted Images

corwest Enthusiast

corwest

Posted
Posted (edited)

Better than my gmt900 5.3 V8. Never been one for the smaller motors in full size trucks but this thing exceeds all my expectations for a V6.

Edited by corwest
  • Like 1
The4thgearkid Enthusiast

The4thgearkid

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Better than my gmt900 5.3 V8. Never been one for the smaller motors in full size trucks but this thing exceeds all my expectations for a V6.

That's good to hear. Bad thing is about the forums is you read about an issue and then you might start looking for it. I am on my third Harley and stopped reading the boards because those make all kinds of noises...lol. Just looking to see how people felt about it. I know when I got into a 2014 and drove it I was very impressed but waited a year bought a 2015. My last V8 was a 2007 f150. I am also impressed with this engine,

corwest Enthusiast

corwest

Posted
Posted (edited)

Couldn't be more true. Most people who speak poorly of things on forums go searching for a place to speak that way. It's very rare you find people who are completely satisfied who go looking for a place to tell people how happy they are. Of course this motor is not a V8 and of course it isn't as powerful as one but it is lightyears ahead of what I pictured for a V6 in a half ton and for that it gets my vote.

Edited by corwest
  • Like 3
arkenzo Enthusiast

arkenzo

Posted
Posted

I've got about 26,000 miles on my 4.3 and have been very pleased with the performance and towing so far that I have done with it.

 

I wouldn't pay much more for the 5.3, however I do regret not getting the 6.2L, that motor is BEAST

Brian S. Enthusiast

Brian S.

Posted
Posted

I had a 2014 4.3l 4WD LT Z71 Silverado with the All Star pack last year and think it's a good engine, but I did have one problem with it.

 

I tow a 2500lb boat at least weekly for half the year. The engine has enough power to easily tow that much weight, but there is no external transmission oil cooler on that model. I asked the dealer I bought it from to install one, and they refused, stating there was no part for it and that they did not recommend I add an aftermarket part.

 

I couldn't get what I wanted so I bought a 2015 5.3l LT Z71 Sierra with Value Pack with an external cooler. Probably overkill for something that likely wouldn't have been a problem, but I lost a year of miles on the truck, added a year of payments at $12/mo higher, so it wasn't a big deal.

 

Other than the transmission cooler, I liked the 4.3l a lot. It drove a lot like my three previous 5.3l Silverados, and even very close on the towing. That's amazing for a NA V6 in my opinion, I'm more impressed by this than the Ecoboost.

 

From what I can tell the 4.3l gets 1-2mpg better than the 5.3l.

  • Like 1
The4thgearkid Enthusiast

The4thgearkid

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well I test drove one right when they hit the lot in 2014, regular cab, and I couldn't believe it, I couldn't believe it was a v6. I waited a year and found a double cab, I don't haul a lot, I just have always drove trucks and dint need a 4x4. I wanted a WT, didn't want all the bells and whistles... Heck I was upset I couldn't get crank windows. But what I want and had to have was the G80 locker, two sand bags in the back and snow is no problem this truck is straight up awesome.

 

This engine is very nice, I couldn't be happier with the engines power gas mileage. I have had no remorse buying this truck...

  • Thanks 1
Imcrazy Senior Enthusiast

Imcrazy

Posted
Posted

I've got 19500 or so on mine, its a 4x4 with a 3.42 rear end and I'm very pleased with it.

  • Like 1
wing98 Enthusiast

wing98

Posted
Posted

I have 14000 on mine best 4.3 I have ever owned very pleased

  • Like 1
Perseus Enthusiast

Perseus

Posted
Posted

7000 miles on mine. Love everything. Really want to try towing with it. Just don't want to go overboard. Would like to trailer my Mustang to the track with it and maybe a travel trailer see how it does

Also if anyone has real world figures on level kit and larger tires, I'm interested in mall crawling

MD Chevy Enthusiast

MD Chevy

Posted
Posted

16000 miles on mine. Have towed between 3000-3500 and it did it very well. Worst tank of gas has been 15.3 (towing in western Maryland mountains) and my best has been 22 (running 75 going to Disney). For everyday driving not much difference between it and my brothers 14 CC 5.3. When he steps on his thats the difference. Not enough for me to worry about though...

  • Like 2
Brian S. Enthusiast

Brian S.

Posted
Posted

16000 miles on mine. Have towed between 3000-3500 and it did it very well. Worst tank of gas has been 15.3 (towing in western Maryland mountains) and my best has been 22 (running 75 going to Disney). For everyday driving not much difference between it and my brothers 14 CC 5.3. When he steps on his thats the difference. Not enough for me to worry about though...

I had the 4.3l with 4wd/3.42 gears Xcab last year, now have the 5.3l with 4wd/3.42 gears Xcab and agree with what you say.

 

In normal driving, the 4.3 and 5.3 drive largely the same. The difference is when you put the pedal on the floor because that's when you tap into the extra horsepower and torque.

 

The 4.3l with 3.42 gears is only 1/2 second slower 0-60mph than the 5.3l with the standard 3.08 gears, the 4.3l moves the truck around very well.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Perseus Enthusiast

Perseus

Posted
Posted

16000 miles on mine. Have towed between 3000-3500 and it did it very well. Worst tank of gas has been 15.3 (towing in western Maryland mountains) and my best has been 22 (running 75 going to Disney). For everyday driving not much difference between it and my brothers 14 CC 5.3. When he steps on his thats the difference. Not enough for me to worry about though...

My car weighs about 3400 lbs I figure 1,000 for the trailer. And I'm looking at 20 ft pull behinds. Roughly 3500-4200 dry weight I wonder if I'm expecting to much or not
MD Chevy Enthusiast

MD Chevy

Posted
Posted

My car weighs about 3400 lbs I figure 1,000 for the trailer. And I'm looking at 20 ft pull behinds. Roughly 3500-4200 dry weight I wonder if I'm expecting to much or not

I know my truck 4x4 double cab 3:42's had no problem pulling what I put behind it. I was able to maintain 67 mph going up mountains right at 3800 rpm. I could've gained speed if I wanted to. Truthfully I would have zero problems pulling 6000 pounds. I would take it slower so I could stop easier. This new 4.3, while not a V8, is a very solid performer. You will be just fine with that weight!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • Atlas
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Atlas · Posted

      People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
    • ShotgunZ71
      Poll: Does your truck have the rear window leak?

      By ShotgunZ71 · Posted

      Glad you had success with it. I did as well, but about 5-6 months later it returned. Tried again, same result. This was after the dealer made several attempts and never even got it to slow down.
    • KARNUT
      Gas Prices

      By KARNUT · Posted

      3.15 Kroger’s in Montgomery Tx

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...