Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just did a few squirts tonight. Engine is at 7000miles or 11000kms approx. didn't do as much as most of you. Just a few cycles of 10 seconds each. I figure I'll do it again every 10000kms.

 

Didn't chance anything for me and didn't expect it to but I believe in the concept and will do it as maintenance.

Posted

I just did a few squirts tonight. Engine is at 7000miles or 11000kms approx. didn't do as much as most of you. Just a few cycles of 10 seconds each. I figure I'll do it again every 10000kms.

 

Didn't chance anything for me and didn't expect it to but I believe in the concept and will do it as maintenance.

 

Right.. you don't really WANT it to make a difference cos that means your engine was getting dirty inside. If it never makes a difference.. you're probably running much cleaner.

 

I figure you could PROBABLY make this part of your oil change procedure if you wanted to. CRC recommends it every 10k miles, maybe every 3rd oil change if you do 3k changes.

Posted

Just a heads up to anyone going to do this after as many miles as I have on my truck (over 70,000km/45,000 miles). I was just doing some errands and I noticed my mileage decreasing big time, went from my average of around 20l/100km to almost 27l/100km and then I noticed my idle started to get pretty rough while in drive and stopped at a stop light. When I went to accelerate my check engine light came on.

 

I used torque to find the code, having a feeling a head of time what it would be and I was right. P0420 catalyst bank below threshold. Now I am not 100% certain the seafoam caused it, but I don't think I'm being unreasonable by assuming the free'd up carbon is now stuck in my catalytic converters.

 

I reset the check engine light and my mileage has dropped back down to 23l/100km just in the short trip home. I checked torque again when I got home and the truck hasn't finished runnning its test on that catalyst bank yet so I can't update on this. Luckily if it does come back it should be covered under warranty.

 

The other possibility is that I have an exhaust leak, hopefully they do not give me any grief about my welded on muffler if I have to take it in for warranty.

would like to hear more on this

Posted

I'm not a believer that at 30k miles the backside of the intake valves on these engines (one in good mechanical condition) will have buildup of carbon such that airflow is restricted. I think something in the flow sensing loops got cleaned and is working correctly.

  • Like 2
Posted

Just a heads up to anyone going to do this after as many miles as I have on my truck (over 70,000km/45,000 miles). I was just doing some errands and I noticed my mileage decreasing big time, went from my average of around 20l/100km to almost 27l/100km and then I noticed my idle started to get pretty rough while in drive and stopped at a stop light. When I went to accelerate my check engine light came on.

 

I used torque to find the code, having a feeling a head of time what it would be and I was right. P0420 catalyst bank below threshold. Now I am not 100% certain the seafoam caused it, but I don't think I'm being unreasonable by assuming the free'd up carbon is now stuck in my catalytic converters.

 

I reset the check engine light and my mileage has dropped back down to 23l/100km just in the short trip home. I checked torque again when I got home and the truck hasn't finished runnning its test on that catalyst bank yet so I can't update on this. Luckily if it does come back it should be covered under warranty.

 

The other possibility is that I have an exhaust leak, hopefully they do not give me any grief about my welded on muffler if I have to take it in for warranty.

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Keep us updated with your situation, hope everything works out.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

There'd have to be a huge amount of carbon to plug the converters to the point of an error code. More likely, the Seafoam coated the catalytic surfaces of the converters or a sensor and caused the code. Some extended high speed driving may burn off whatever is in there.

Edited by spurshot
Posted

I'm not a believer that at 30k miles the backside of the intake valves on these engines (one in good mechanical condition) will have buildup of carbon such that airflow is restricted. I think something in the flow sensing loops got cleaned and is working correctly.

 

I'm not sure if you saw my post of the intake valves on my engine Hard to say if there is enough buildup on the valves to affect performance but I would like to see less: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/168709-intake-manifold-off-with-pics-of-intake-valves-with-deposits/

Posted

It could very well just be some residue built up on the cats too, I'm taking a 250km trip tomorrow night. I'll be watching for it to come back.

Posted

I'm not sure if you saw my post of the intake valves on my engine Hard to say if there is enough buildup on the valves to affect performance but I would like to see less: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/168709-intake-manifold-off-with-pics-of-intake-valves-with-deposits/

Hard to say for sure from just those pix. Did you see oil from the PCV tap, downstream, inside the manifold? I'm wondering if this could be a valve guide oiling issue with a little reversion spreading it upstream?

Posted

I've torn down a few LSx motors and I've never sen valves look anything like that.

 

Pistons yes, but valves no. (they weren't direct injection of course..)

 

I know that if you have that much gunk on your throttle body it will stick, cause rough idle and other misc. problems though.

 

I would agree with spurlock it doesn't make sense to me that it improved as much as it did. A tangible difference in performance and fuel economy should not come from such a thing at only 30k miles. How much of it is in my head? How much of it is a switch back to summer fuel? How much of it is a change in my driving habits? Probably more of it than anyone gives it credit, but it's hard to measure those things.

 

I think the main takeaway, at least for me is even if it doesn't make a significant difference, if my valves look like gone_fishing's valves, or even half of that.. a $10 can of cleaner and ~20 minutes of my time (well ok more if you include the driving and all) is good piece of mind.

 

I'd also be more likened to believe the error code would be chemical and not a chunk of stuff clogging the cats. You'd have to have pretty big intake valves and pretty big chunks (thick ones too) to not be destroyed by the pistons. I mean think about what that chunk would have to do.. flake off the intake valve into the piston, survive the explosion, get pushed into the exhaust valve, survive the heat and pressure of all the other cylinders and make it all the way to the cat as a chunk large enough to get caught in the cat's "filter." Not impossible I'm sure, but probably less likely than a chemical soak on the o2 sensor.

 

That being said.. if the CEL comes back.. please let us know what, if anything.. the dealer does.I can't imagine they'd buck a warranty claim, even if they knew you ran a valve system cleaner.

Posted

All this got me thinking about getting a cheap borescope to check out my intake tract and valves. A little looking and I found a $30-40 usb scope that works with a laptop. I ma y order something soon.

  • Like 1
Posted

All this got me thinking about getting a cheap borescope to check out my intake tract and valves. A little looking and I found a $30-40 usb scope that works with a laptop. I ma y order something soon.

Great idea! Keep us posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,993
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    President Roberto
    Newest Member
    President Roberto
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 268 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...