Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lets see a pic of your trip from today to next week. In a week. Any 1 can ho drive 4, 20 miles on the highway and and start a trip vount going 50 mph like im dure your doing an get those numbers. .... show me miles after a week

  • Like 1
Posted

 

No I did not. Did really feel like taking the intake manifold off again if you know what I mean.

 

 

Yes there was oil covering the inside of the intake.

 

 

I thought about doing something like this too but I think it might be pretty difficult. On the inside of the intake manifold, the runners aren't easily accessible because of a cylinder that starts at the throttle body and goes about half way back. Here is a picture from PickUPS in the "Oil Catch can?" thread showing the inside of his intake manifold. This is on a 4.3 but the 5.3 is similar. I don't want to discourage you from trying to get a camera down to the intake valves but just wanted to let you know that it might be tricky. If you get it to work let me know as I would be interested in getting one of those cameras then.

 

IMG_2402behindthrottle-bodynovalleyventt

 

I know what you mean. The runners intersect the plenum at a right angle to the throttle body inlet also. It's a longshot, but I ordered a $35 borescope 1 meter long. I can always pull a plug and look at a valve that's open to see how bad my engine looks. More toys.

 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00G91N362/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

516Edcf1lwL.jpg

Posted

Lets see a pic of your trip from today to next week. In a week. Any 1 can ho drive 4, 20 miles on the highway and and start a trip vount going 50 mph like im dure your doing an get those numbers. .... show me miles after a week

Huh?????

Posted

Huh?????

Sorry, ive big fat fingers trying to type on my phone. All im asking is for him to to a trip counter with more then 400 miles a week average
Posted
OK.. I'm getting a catch can. There a thread for this? (I'm sure there is.. but.. I need to know how to

 

 

16a8fd6ce302e23fdbde664d6cb46c4c.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Just got a call from the dealership, they're ordering me a new a catalytic converter.

got this from the FAQ on the seafoam website take it for what it is worth......

I added a can of Sea Foam to about 12 gallons of gas in the tank of my 2002 Grand Marquis, then used ½ can of the spray in the intake. Now my car shows a “check engine” light that was not previously on. Did the Sea Foam somehow cause this? What should I do about it?

Jim’s answer:

Adding Sea Foam Spray Cleaner and Lube directly into the intake will, in some cases, trigger the “check engine” light due to misfires that occur while you’re spraying. The misfiring was only temporary, and you should be able to easily turn the light off by clearing the error code.

[Question asked by Tango Devin]

Posted

Ok after reading this, but having now issues I tried it..... It was pretty easy but very nerve wracking to say the least. I used the CRC product since it is specific for the Valves. I sprayed it right into the Throttle Body while my Wife did the Throttle. While letting it soak, I did spray and wipe out the throttle plate area.

 

After the soak, I started the Motor but it started like shit. I backed out garage and when I drove off it was very sluggish and lots of crap out the Exhaust! My Driveway is 1200 feet long and just took it easy going down, but again very sluggish. I stopped and pulled out onto my country road which It bobbled a couple of times and get much better as I was just driving normal. Took it for a 15 drive at varying speeds and it seems fine.

 

I will no what and see long term if it had any affect...... Again, very easy but nerve wracking!!!! lol

Posted

I did the CRC before my CC install. Same conditions as you. I believe they recommend a good freeway drive after.

Posted

Strange thing happend with my wife's sonata. She has 30k miles I just put the can on. I did a whole can of crc let it set an hour and went for a spirited ride. Started normal. I pulled out into my development and when I got up to just about 3000 RPMs. I heard the loudest clicking noise as if somebody dropped a pin screwdriver or a pencil or something inside the motor. I was scared shitless but I don't normally I have no check engine lights or anything. So I made it out of the development of on the road and still when I had about 3500 RPMs a few click click click. I drove about 3 miles down to a country road and I was going to walk to see if I can hear it again. There was nothing so I got on it for a spirited ride and a few 80 mile an hour passes. No clicks no issues can't even tell the car is running at a stop sign. The same thing to my truck only get a half can since I only had 10 K miles and it had an oil CATch can on the last 5K. No issues at start up no clicks no noise in some fun country road driving it feels like the day I bought it. I am curious though about my wife sonata and that clicking. Couldn't have really been that gunked up in something broke off

Posted

Probably hard particles of carbon floating around in the cylinder :driving:

  • Like 1
Posted

Ok after reading this, but having now issues I tried it..... It was pretty easy but very nerve wracking to say the least. I used the CRC product since it is specific for the Valves. I sprayed it right into the Throttle Body while my Wife did the Throttle. While letting it soak, I did spray and wipe out the throttle plate area.

 

After the soak, I started the Motor but it started like shit. I backed out garage and when I drove off it was very sluggish and lots of crap out the Exhaust! My Driveway is 1200 feet long and just took it easy going down, but again very sluggish. I stopped and pulled out onto my country road which It bobbled a couple of times and get much better as I was just driving normal. Took it for a 15 drive at varying speeds and it seems fine.

 

I will no what and see long term if it had any affect...... Again, very easy but nerve wracking!!!! lol

 

 

This is sort of what mine did. The first start after the soak was slightly delayed, it had to turn over a few more times than it normally does on a prepped start. It was also boggy at the beginning of my drive. The more I drove it the better it got though. The 2nd drive it was a totally different truck.

Posted

Sorta on the topic, but I have a theory on the 6.2 vs 5.3 mileage. The V4 mode in the 6.2 has a larger displacement as compared to the 5.3 in the same mode. In fact, the 5.3 has the smallest displacement of all:

 

4.3: 2.87L

5.3: 2.65L

6.2: 3.1L

 

So, the theory may hold that the 6.2 may be able to produce the greatest power in V4, and would, therefore, be able to enter V4 and hold it longer since the move to/from V4 is based largely on engine demand vs output. The 6.2 maaaay have sliiiightly higher pumping/frictional losses in V4, but I bet this is negligible.

 

As V4 mode is a big player in mileage, I wonder if this is actually a GOOD element with respect to the 6.2?

The normal driver is in V4 modes 10-15% of the time - not a big contributor. So 80-90% of the time the 6.2L is gulping gas. You're assumption that the 6.2L gets better mileage in any situation but maybe towing is incorrect. You are not accurately representing highway mileage when you reset your trip computer as you enter the highway on-ramp and then use cruise control for 20 miles. I can get the same or better results with my 5.3L. If you do a quick Google search or go to FuelEconomy.gov, you will see that highway mileage is actually calculated/tested as a doorstep-to-doorstep type scenario. There are stops, starts, cruising at various speeds (slow and fast), passing, running of the AC, etc.

 

Unless you run the same test several times with similar/controlled conditions before and after your cleaning, there is no way to prove that your intake cleaning was of any significant benefit. To simply put your cruise control on 70, reset your trip computer, take a snapshot and compare it to the 5.3L is misleading.

  • Like 2
Posted

My 5.3 with 3.08 gears on the highway, reset trip meter once at cruise speed (78mph) for 150 miles gets 19.9mpg while going down hill and 19.1mpg while going up hill. (about a 1000 ft decline/incline over 150 miles.)

 

Oddly enough, if I reset the trip meter and tool around my daily driving. I get about 19.0-19.4mpg right now.

 

Prior to the cleaning I was seeing about the same highway, but around town was 17.9-18.4mpg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,189 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...