Jump to content

What octane gas?

ymc226
 Share

Recommended Posts

ymc226 Enthusiast

ymc226

Posted
Posted

I read the manual and it stated Top Tier gas brands were recommended but no specific octane. Just bought a 2016 LT Suburban with the Luxury package. Previously used just the cheapest regularly (87 octane) gas on my 2008 LTZ.

Andy Seibel Enthusiast

Andy Seibel

Posted
Posted

well if its the luxury package, you should probably use premium gas...

 

j/k. I would still use regular unleaded just like every other engine that is not a tuned high performance machine.

 

I'm sure we'll hear from others who swear they get better performance from the premium fuel, so buy whatever you want.

Dnt Senior Enthusiast

Dnt

Posted
Posted (edited)
post-127028-0-28094300-1476485477_thumb.jpg

Do NOT be buying up all the Premium fuel I need that stuff!. I like 93 octane from any supplier off the top tier fuel list for my tuned 6.2. Runs like a friggin Banshee and gets awesome gas mileage.......

I ran a lot of E85 through my 14 5.3 and never even considered top tier as being important just bought the cheapest stuff available whether E85 or regular 87 octane. The 5.3 really liked anything that I fed it, but the fuel mileage does suffer a bit on the E85.. I guess that is a BIg advantage in staying with the 5.3 engine if you are on a tight budget..

Edited by MyFavTruck
The Zip Senior Enthusiast

The Zip

Posted
Posted

I read the manual and it stated Top Tier gas brands were recommended but no specific octane. Just bought a 2016 LT Suburban with the Luxury package. Previously used just the cheapest regularly (87 octane) gas on my 2008 LTZ.

From the Chevrolet manual, page 9-70; "Use regular unleaded gasoline meeting ASTM specification D4814 with a posted octane rating of 87 or higher. Do not use gasoline with an octane rating below 87, as it may cause engine damage and will lower fuel economy". I use 89, but as long as you don't use below 87, no where in the manual does it say the truck will perform better with anything higher.

  • 2 weeks later...
redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted (edited)

I read the manual and it stated Top Tier gas brands were recommended but no specific octane. Just bought a 2016 LT Suburban with the Luxury package. Previously used just the cheapest regularly (87 octane) gas on my 2008 LTZ.

'Top Tier' is a certification of gasoline and additives, not of octane level.

National brands and larger regional brands will all have the certification. Discount independents may or may not.

 

http://www.toptiergas.com/

 

Some don't wish to pay for certification and may have the full package without it.

 

It's unlikely that a single tank of top tier, or a single tank that isn't would be noticeable to most.

Edited by redwngr
  • 3 weeks later...
Wrench589 Enthusiast

Wrench589

Posted
Posted

It's very important to use the recommended minimum octane in the engine, even today's modern engines with knock sensors. The 5.3L only needs 87 octane but the 6.2L needs 91 octane minimum.

 

As for using a fuel with a higher octane rating that required, well that's a complicated discussion. Some people believe higher octane fuels burn "slower" and hence will actually reduce performance in a engine that doesn't require higher octane fuel. That's true and not true. For retail pumps fuels, not really true. It is true for racing fuels, though. Racing fuels are not a good idea in your grocery getter!!

 

Some folks believe there is a difference in heat content (BTUs) between the different grades of octane fuels. And hence, a difference in the power gained in the engine. There is some truth to this, as it turns out. But, the difference is very small. More importantly, it's not always directionally consistent. In other words, with some brands, their high octane has slightly more heat content than their low octane; some brands it's the other way around. And, even within a brand, it will vary seasonally as well as regionally depending which specific refinery he fuel s coming from. So unless you want to carry around a BTU tester, it's virtually impossible to take advantage of the difference.

 

The octane rating itself will not produce more power in and engine that doesn't need it.

 

Yet some people are convinced their vehicle runs better on high octant (premium) fuel. BS? May not be. Some brands use more additives in their high octane fuels than the lower octane. Things like detergents to keep the injectors clean, anticorrosion additives, stabilizer to keep the fuel from degrading and vaporizing in the tank, etc. And some vehicles are more sensitive to the fuel and buildup on the injectors. So, by buying the higher octane fuel, you end up getting a higher quality fuel which can be helpful. Which is the point of the top tier fuels. These are higher quality fuels. And that DOES make a difference. At least for some vehicles. No way to know which ones, so buyer beware. But I would rather error on the safe side and only put high quality fuel in my vehicles. Unless your driving a huge number of miles a year, what's it really cost extra? JMHO.

  • Like 1
markitzero Enthusiast

markitzero

Posted
Posted

I've been using mostly top tier 87 in my 2016 Suburban but the one thing that has bothered me is the idle being rough. It's not concerning but I am just accustom to perfectly smooth idling vehicles and this is not one of them. I filled with a tank of ethanol free 87 and immediately noticed a smoother idle. I was considering trying a tank of premium ethanol free to see if that makes any difference.

Driver72 Enthusiast

Driver72

Posted
Posted

 

Do NOT be buying up all the Premium fuel I need that stuff!. I like 93 octane from any supplier off the top tier fuel list for my tuned 6.2. Runs like a friggin Banshee and gets awesome gas mileage.......

I ran a lot of E85 through my 14 5.3 and never even considered top tier as being important just bought the cheapest stuff available whether E85 or regular 87 octane. The 5.3 really liked anything that I fed it, but the fuel mileage does suffer a bit on the E85.. I guess that is a BIg advantage in staying with the 5.3 engine if you are on a tight budget..

 

 

 

Which tune are you using?

Driver72 Enthusiast

Driver72

Posted
Posted (edited)

If you have the 5.3 just use 87 Octane if you go to a top tier gas station.

If you have to fill up at some cheap-o no name brand discount gas station, you may want to throw in 89 Octane just to offset the craptacular discount gas. :)

Edited by Driver72
TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

While the 5.3l does state 87 is to be used, most of the data logging on the 5.3l has shown they really should be running 89 or even 91. My 6.2l sees nothing other than 91 or a mix of 100 and 91 to get me to 93/94 octane since Oklahoma doesn't have 93 octane anymore.

Dnt Senior Enthusiast

Dnt

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

Which tune are you using?

Hypertech max energy 2.0 part 2000. Really only bought it because it allows you to set a speed at which the AFM only comes on above. I have the GM Borla catback exh and the AFM at low speed irritates me. The Hypertech has 2 options for tune Premium fuel tune and a Regular fuel tune. I ran the premium fuel tune for about 5000 miles with only 93 octane. Got bored so just changed to regular fuel tune and put in a tank of top tier 87 octane as a test. I am getting an occasional click when in 4V at very light throttle around 58 to 62 mph. Next tank will be top tier 89 octane to see if the occasional click goes away. Looks like the verdict is DO NOT USE 87 OCTANE with a 6.2 no matter what tune you use! Truck has around 11,000 miles on it so figured it was broke in enough to experiment on a bit.

mostly city driving with loooong remote start warmups, the Denali DIC calculates overall average speed so that is why the 39mph average. that always seems to throw people off....
Edited by MyFavTruck
  • Like 1
Wrench589 Enthusiast

Wrench589

Posted
Posted

Hypertech max energy 2.0 part 2000. Really only bought it because it allows you to set a speed at which the AFM only comes on above. I have the GM Borla catback exh and the AFM at low speed irritates me. The Hypertech has 2 options for tune Premium fuel tune and a Regular fuel tune. I ran the premium fuel tune for about 5000 miles with only 93 octane. Got bored so just changed to regular fuel tune and put in a tank of top tier 87 octane as a test. I am getting an occasional click when in 4V at very light throttle around 58 to 62 mph. Next tank will be top tier 89 octane to see if the occasional click goes away. Looks like the verdict is DO NOT USE 87 OCTANE with a 6.2 no matter what tune you use! Truck has around 11,000 miles on it so figured it was broke in enough to experiment on a bit.

 

 

mostly city driving with loooong remote start warmups, the Denali DIC calculates overall average speed so that is why the 39mph average. that always seems to throw people off....

Well, GM does recommend minimum. 91 octane for the 6.2L so no surprise your testing confirmed that. When you say "clicked" are you talking about audible knock, or detonation being picked up on the engine management system. Does the Hypertech let you monitors PIDs like knock?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jsdirt
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      If everything checks out at the MAF, then the MAF is BAD, new or not.   You don't need a signal generator to troubleshoot this. PCM needs ALL powers and ALL grounds able to light a halogen headlight bulb - if it can light the bulb bright, then the wiring is good enough to run the PCM.   Best thing you can do for yourself is spend some time here: scannerdanner.com - Check out all his YouTube videos on similar issues. If you decide to subscribe it's the best bang-for-buck ratio in the automotive world, hands-down. He's got TONS of free vids on YouTube, too.
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      You got that Hengst D110??
    • contrabombarde
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By contrabombarde · Posted

      Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Jsdirt
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • parthery
      GM Hard Folding Tonneau by REV review

      By parthery · Posted

      Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...