Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

EVERY thing on a vehicle is a safety item these days. they are all connected in some way. Fact is mechanical things break. nothing in this world is made so perfect that it cant break. just because something broke doesn't mean issue a recall on it right away. If the OEM's were to be held by that standard no one could ever afford to buy a vehicle and all the companies would go out of business. Yes these truck are expensive no doubt. and yes the OEM's need to constantly thrive to build a better product. but a recall doesn't need to be issued every time a part built by humans fail. Okay let the flaming begin

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm new to the forum, not sure if my post sparked the comment about safety and recall. I was just sharing so that others may know if they get the same issue. Chev dealership was great, fixed it in a couple of hours under warranty.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think the point is that reporting the issue contributes to a national database of issues. NHTSA will determine whether it is a safety issue, based on the consequences of the failure and the frequency of failure. It's kinda like your doctor reporting flu in his patients to CDC.

Posted

I'll tell you the safety issue. Taking it to the dealer four times for this exact issue. Yes I was able to make it stop. Unexpected, sudden occurrence. Significant effort, not nominal. Sometimes in much less than ideal conditions (read: crowded parking lot in rain, positioning to park on an incline...)

 

I wanted it fixed. Dealer ultimately traded me out - '16 for a '16 - special consideration, but no specific allowance for my concern. As in, the next guy could have gotten the same deal. Yes I lost money even as I realize my vehicle isn't an investment. I couldn't stand the risk - especially as I couldn't get a diagnosis.

 

Now, it's a recognized issue. I'm glad for y'all.

Posted

There's a service bulletin for this issue now, GM wants you to replace the pump, booster, master cylinder and the line from the pump to the booster. The pump is definitely a redesign, but I didn't notice anything different with the rest of the parts.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Class action attorneys are currently investigating this issue and would like to hear more about your experience. Did you notice it only at low speeds? Did the brake pedal become hard or difficult to press?

 

You can contact us via email at: [email protected] or visit: https://www.consumeradlaw.com/gmhardbrakepedal

 

There is absolutely no cost or obligation on your part. If you would prefer to reach out by phone, we can be reached at (855) 425-2775. 

Posted (edited)

I was under mistaken idea that since these trucks have high pressure direct injection fuel systems that engine vacuum was not available?

Edited by wmgeorge64
Posted

I tell the wife to take my truck all the time this may be a concern to think about !

 

I wonder why this would not throw a code seems like a another sensor is needed here .

Posted
On 11/13/2016 at 9:29 PM, mkward72 said:

 

I fail to see is why it's a safety issue. The breaking system Never failed. You just have to press the pedal harder. When the power steering pump goes out it's a safety issue to? You don't lose steering just the assistance to turn the wheel easier.

When there is a low voltage issue.....you DO lose steering ......there are stories on here of people having the steering wheel ripped from their hands and loss of ability to steer. So far been bad grounds/dead cells is batteries/too much resistance in battery cables.

Posted
6 hours ago, Artie61 said:

I tell the wife to take my truck all the time this may be a concern to think about !

 

I wonder why this would not throw a code seems like a another sensor is needed here .

There is a Vacuum sensor on the brake booster. When low vacuum is detected, it disables AFM....it should flash on the dash that you are SCREWED if the computer detects low vacuum.....I dont think it would be hard for someone to design an aftermarket Vacuum gauge and tie into that sensor.

 

Lots of us would buy them. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Paintor said:

When there is a low voltage issue.....you DO lose steering ......there are stories on here of people having the steering wheel ripped from their hands and loss of ability to steer. So far been bad grounds/dead cells is batteries/too much resistance in battery cables.

So your telling me that GM put a vehicle on the road that relies on the steering system to be powered by electricity at all times to maintain steering control of the vehicle? That's BS!

 

Posted
So your telling me that GM put a vehicle on the road that relies on the steering system to be powered by electricity at all times to maintain steering control of the vehicle? That's BS!
 
Not BS, my son got rid of a 15 Tahoe that did just that. Along with blinking dash lights and head lights. She had her daughter record the event and showed the dealer. Funny how they had a two week wait for a fix at the dealership. The problem was never fixed, he took at 15K hit on the POS.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 2 months later...
Posted

This happend to me today first my ac compressor shells now this i reported this i urge everyone to report this it was so sudden if i was pulling a trailer i would have most likely wrecked

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Chris j said:

This happend to me today first my ac compressor shells now this i reported this i urge everyone to report this it was so sudden if i was pulling a trailer i would have most likely wrecked

Did your vacuum pump go out?

Edited by gone_fishing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,189 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...