Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Tolerances on the engines for the '14+ trucks are much tighter than they used to be. Tighter places calls for thinner oils. Manufacturers are all about fuel economy these days.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Got any blueprints or technical data to back that claim up? Why is GM building Corvette LT1's to a looser spec than the LT1's in their pickup trucks? GM recommended 5w30 in their C7 Corvettes and 6th Gen Camaro SS. Plus 15w50 for C7 Corvettes in track day events.

Edited by HondaHawkGT
Posted (edited)

The closer tolerances argument has been primarily market driven. Engineers are fully aware there has to be space between engine components, bearings, etc. Tribilogistds forte is analyzing the dynamics of component interaction and lubrication. Engine components are subjected to wide variances in thermal forces as well as physical forces.

 

Modern manufacturing and CNC technology has more to do part uniformity than so-called tighter tolerances.

 

Then is some bureaucrat's idea of how things should be done. The reality is, gooberment wields a big stick and has a way of altering reality to fit their world view. The engineers and tribologists be damned.

 

My 2015 2500 gets a 10w30 as does my Cadillac CTS. I have about as much concern over what the current Gooberment and OEM cartel has to say on the issue as I do regarding if we will be hit by a comet that will destroy life as we know it. I have not had an engine grenade in 45 years, from my small stuff on up thru 15L engines. The latter of which I have taken a few over 1 million miles. Combine that with several GM and Fords that I have taken to over 250,000 miles, also with no major oil related issues.

Edited by Cowpie
Posted

The tighter tolerance claim is a word-of-mouth claim. If the L86 and L83 are built to a tighter tolerance, it would be difficult to explain why GM specifically recommended 15W50 in an L86 during track use.

 

http://www.stingrayforums.com/forum/stingray-corvette-performance/16925-tadge-s-answer-why-15w50-oil-track-use.html#/topics/16925?page=1&_k=dsq5l5

 

The reality is that GM balanced engine protection vs meeting EPA fuel economy goals when selecting 0w20 for the pickups vs 5w30 for the Corevette/Camaro SS. 0w20 is nice in the winter, but if you drive your truck aggressively in the summer, your engine would be much better off running a 5w30 oil like the C7 Corvettes.

  • Like 1
Posted

I run Mobil 1 extended performance 5w-30 in all of the GMC vehicles except my 02. I run Mobil 1 high mileage 10w-30 in it with its 219k mi on it. My uncle's '13 Silverado, the '14 sonic before the '17 Trax and when the free oil changes is up with the Trax it will also get the Mobil 1. I prefer AC Delco filters on GM vehicles also. Haven't messed with any GM direct injected motors yet.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

Its been some time, which of you have ran 5w30 on Gen V L83s? I have always used 0w20 on my 2015 and everything has been just fine.

 

Could i switch 5w30 safely? I live in Mexico an rarely see any freezing temperatures under 32 degrees F

Posted
Its been some time, which of you have ran 5w30 on Gen V L83s? I have always used 0w20 on my 2015 and everything has been just fine.
 
Could i switch 5w30 safely? I live in Mexico an rarely see any freezing temperatures under 32 degrees F
No don't switch.. The variable valve timing, active fuel management and the two stage oil pump need 0w20 for proper operation..

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

0W-20 engine oil can reduce the startup load by making it easier to turn over a cold engine and the impact is felt at higher temperatures than most consumers would think,  not simply to what feels colds to humans - warm summers days are cold to an parked engine.  

 

Posted

USE WHAT IT SAYS ON THE OIL FILL CAP...This goes for every vehicle!

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted
2 hours ago, Hillwood said:

USE WHAT IT SAYS ON THE OIL FILL CAP...This goes for every vehicle!

Will do, the reason i was wondering is that 0w20 is very difficult to get in Mexico, i only can get ACDelco at the dealer

 

20 hours ago, Hillwood said:

No don't switch.. The variable valve timing, active fuel management and the two stage oil pump need 0w20 for proper operation..

I disabled the AFM a long time ago (when i first bought the truck) but youre right about the VVT and The Oil Pump, those are important to consider

Posted
21 hours ago, Hillwood said:

No don't switch.. The variable valve timing, active fuel management and the two stage oil pump need 0w20 for proper operation..

That's just false.  Corvettes use exactly the same parts and recommend 5W-30 for street use, 15W-50 for track use.

  • Haha 1
Posted
That's just false.  Corvettes use exactly the same parts and recommend 5W-30 for street use, 15W-50 for track use.
The exact same parts? Are you going to buy engine parts for your truck and put them on your Corvette? No difference right?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted

Use what the oil cap says and manufacturer says Unless you know something they don't.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Hillwood said:

The exact same parts? Are you going to buy engine parts for your truck and put them on your Corvette? No difference right?

Yes.  Exact.  Same.  Parts.  The only difference between the 6.2 in the truck and the Corvette are the intake and exhaust manifolds, oil pan and accessory layout.  The 5.3 naturally has different parts related to the displacement but there is no design difference for the parts you mentioned.

Edited by Jon A
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • 1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...