Jump to content

IPhone 8 & wireless charging pad


Recommended Posts

Posted

Chatted with the GMC Infotainment division this evening. They said that since the iPhone 8 just rolled out they haven't had a chance to test the phone. I was advised to check back in a couple of weeks to check the compatibility status. He said that not all phones are compatible with the wireless charging feature. I mentioned that the standards are shared between the iPhone 8 and the GMC, but he just sent me the link below, 3 times.

 

https://my.chevrolet.com/content/dam/gmownercenter/gmna/static/pageImages/learnAbout/articles/documents/GM_Wireless_Charging_Compatible_Device.pdf

Well I know that at least one of the phones on there that says is incompatible, is in fact compatible. So I'm not sure how accurate that is
  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

My Samsung S7 Edge is physically too wide to sit down in the tray properly. Even without the case.

 

I think if the tray were 1/16" wider, we'd all be happy as clams. OR at least whine about the lousy charging.

 

But I agree with the Android Auto the issue is moot. It just seems like on a $50k+ truck, using the wireless charger should be up to me.

Posted

My Samsung S7 Edge is physically too wide to sit down in the tray properly. Even without the case.

 

I think if the tray were 1/16" wider, we'd all be happy as clams. OR at least whine about the lousy charging.

 

But I agree with the Android Auto the issue is moot. It just seems like on a $50k+ truck, using the wireless charger should be up to me.

Totally agree... although all my phones have worked, it's a lousy design. Just bad engineering, especially with how large phones are and have been. It's nothing new. Should have been considered
Posted

I have an S7 and I'm confused by this thread.

 

And I didn't watch the whole video.

 

My S7 will charge on my 2016 SLT's pad. No mods to pad, no mods to phone (and no extra case on phone).

The phone must be placed towards the rear to charge. The method is to hold on an angle with the bottom against the ridge on the rear and then lower the rest of the phone. Works every time. But - if the phone sides ahead it will stop charging and the process will need to be repeated.

 

All of that said, the wireless charger is slow. If you want AA to operate, it won't work unless the cable is plugged in anyway.

 

If you're looking for a 'quick top-up' on the battery, the cable is the better way.

 

I leave a cable plugged into one of the usb's in the armrest/console with the end for the phone sticking out (a little) thru one of the notches.

Posted

I have an S7 and I'm confused by this thread.

 

And I didn't watch the whole video.

 

My S7 will charge on my 2016 SLT's pad. No mods to pad, no mods to phone (and no extra case on phone).

The phone must be placed towards the rear to charge. The method is to hold on an angle with the bottom against the ridge on the rear and then lower the rest of the phone. Works every time. But - if the phone sides ahead it will stop charging and the process will need to be repeated.

 

All of that said, the wireless charger is slow. If you want AA to operate, it won't work unless the cable is plugged in anyway.

 

If you're looking for a 'quick top-up' on the battery, the cable is the better way.

 

I leave a cable plugged into one of the usb's in the armrest/console with the end for the phone sticking out (a little) thru one of the notches.

 

You don't find it odd that a wireless phone charging tray won't wirelessly charge a phone?

 

Just because I don't use the trailer light plug, wouldn't excuse GM in my mind if they used some weird plug that didn't fit half the trailers out there.

Posted

I have two 2016 Chevy's - neither of them charge the iPhone 8. When I called the Infotaiment folks they told me the same thing listed above - the phone was too new to "test" on the charging mat. I would certainly think that Apple and GM could have gotten together before this to "test" the charging mat's capability along with the phone's. I also received an email response telling me to take the vehicle(s) into my local Chevrolet dealer to have the mat checked. My phone works on every other charging mat and the mat(s) are energized - they are just not powerful enough to worth this the new Qi technology. My suggestion is that GM replace the current power supply with something more powerful so that we can start using this feature in our overpriced vehicles.

Posted

 

You don't find it odd that a wireless phone charging tray won't wirelessly charge a phone?

 

Just because I don't use the trailer light plug, wouldn't excuse GM in my mind if they used some weird plug that didn't fit half the trailers out there.

Mine works fine -- it's just slow.

 

I was sort of responding to the start of the video Ididn't watch the whole thing) that seemed to be saying that it won't work with an S7 unless it is trimmed.

 

I don't think Apple is telling anyone the details of their future product plans. (or even if they were going play catch up and add it to their phones)

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have gone through the process like the rest of you: make sure my iPhone 8 (no case) works on other charging pads, make sure the pad in my 2017 Sierra has power, took it to the dealership, called GMC infotanement customer service who ‘opened a case’ on the issue. I doubt GMC will do anything about this and I imagine we are out of luck. I’d say our best bet is for everyone with this issue to that you call your dealership and call GMC customer service. The squeaky wheel might just get the grease. 

Posted
On 10/3/2017 at 9:33 AM, Nick The Great said:

 

You don't find it odd that a wireless phone charging tray won't wirelessly charge a phone?

 

Just because I don't use the trailer light plug, wouldn't excuse GM in my mind if they used some weird plug that didn't fit half the trailers out there.

What I'm sayin' is it charges my S7 fine.

 

And since the previous posts I've had someone with an S8 in the truck and their phone charged on the pad as well.  

 

Still haven't had a chance to try an i8 apple.

 

Posted

I plan to put the wireless pad on the repair order every time I take the vehicle in for an oil change.  The interesting thing to me is,  eventhough the dealers or GM wont answer us on the pad not working,  what will they tell prospective vehicle buyers sitting in the $50k plus vehicle that drop their iphone 8 on the pad a nothing happens?  

Posted
I plan to put the wireless pad on the repair order every time I take the vehicle in for an oil change.  The interesting thing to me is,  eventhough the dealers or GM wont answer us on the pad not working,  what will they tell prospective vehicle buyers sitting in the $50k plus vehicle that drop their iphone 8 on the pad a nothing happens?  
They'll tell them to buy an android LOL
Posted
2 hours ago, 8lugmafia said:
8 hours ago, razor2307 said:
I plan to put the wireless pad on the repair order every time I take the vehicle in for an oil change.  The interesting thing to me is,  eventhough the dealers or GM wont answer us on the pad not working,  what will they tell prospective vehicle buyers sitting in the $50k plus vehicle that drop their iphone 8 on the pad a nothing happens?  

They'll tell them to buy an android LOL

Or to plug it in, so they can use CarPlay.

Posted
10 hours ago, redwngr said:

Or to plug it in, so they can use CarPlay.

there should be a way to use car play/android auto via bluetooth. that would be so much better... or be able to activate screen projection wirelessly

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,863
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Bulldogger
    Newest Member
    Bulldogger
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 2 Anonymous, 847 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...