Jump to content

horsepower peaked


Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking at Ram and Ford offerings seems pretty much same engines and h.p. for 19. Even GM states keeping 5.3 and 6.2 although no numbers released yet. All this leads me to believe that maybe mfg's have taken h.p. and torque ''wars'' about as far as their going moving forward.

Posted

I highly doubt that. Just remember the increase comes with increase in technology which comes at a price. GM could put 300HP in a Chevy Spark of they wanted, but for what it would cost, who would buy it?

Posted

The only thing that will put an end to the HP war is government/CAFE regulations. What happened in 1972 could happen again. Technology overcame those regulations-eventually.

Posted

Thoughts on this:

 

CAFE (for IC) has been relaxed a bit and, more and more, manufacturers are adopting EV technology and batteries are improving at a remarkable pace (and getting cheaper).  

 

I might share the belief that hp promotion will wan one day but not sure when. 

 

Who’da thunk someone would be selling the heck out of aluminum half-tons with the premium plant being a V6....?

Posted
2 hours ago, gtbigup01 said:

 GM could put 300HP in a Chevy Spark of they wanted, but for what it would cost, who would buy it?

You would be surprised at how many people would buy a 300 HP Chevy Spark. The ultimate Mustang Eater!!!

Posted

Fuel crisis didn't end the war, it just caused a pullback.  All the doom and gloomers said  the peak is past.  We'll never see that again.  

 

But it's 45 years later and the fight for performance specs is still going on.  

 

We're well past the typical performance from back when, only now we get much better fuel economy and much less emissions to go along with the performance.

 

And the typical economy vehicles today are also much much higher economy than the ones from the 'fuel crisis' era.  And they've added the creature comforts that were unheard of in the econoboxes of that era.

 

 

 

 

Posted

I remember when a friend in the late 70s came to my house with his new trans am. I’m newly married just pick up a fairly clean 66 442 for 200$. I just finished doing the once over and freed up the secondaries on the factory 4bble. It definitely look like a grandma car hubcaps and all. Can’t remember engine size but it had a power glide trans. He was a show off and laughing at me. Before getting hitched I was the one to beat. We went to our spot, I usually had sticks so I just left it in drive. He had a grand am prior I would smoke him with my barracuda so he thought he had me, honestly I did too. Nope the 442 smoke him not even close. The mid- late 70s through the 80s not good.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

So far 2 0f the big 3 are not upping h.p. for 19. I just thought maybe Ram with a new offering would be good time to bring it ...they did not . Ford knew both Ram and GM were coming with new platforms and timing would have been good for Ford to bring it ...they did not . All the Buzzword is about luxury and more refinement. One hundred thousand dollar F-150 and silverado trucks may be seen a lot more in a few years. Look how these trucks have transformed from a tool of ''work'' to luxury highly appointed family ''people'' movers. All the mfg's are saying people want more higher end appointments in their family haulers. I am not saying h.p. may not creep up a tiny bit but it is not trending now .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

I will take dependability over H.P. every time.

:)

Posted
11 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I remember when a friend in the late 70s came to my house with his new trans am. I’m newly married just pick up a fairly clean 66 442 for 200$. I just finished doing the once over and freed up the secondaries on the factory 4bble. It definitely look like a grandma car hubcaps and all. Can’t remember engine size but it had a power glide trans. He was a show off and laughing at me. Before getting hitched I was the one to beat. We went to our spot, I usually had sticks so I just left it in drive. He had a grand am prior I would smoke him with my barracuda so he thought he had me, honestly I did too. Nope the 442 smoke him not even close. The mid- late 70s through the 80s not good.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A 1966 442 would have had a 400 CID Olds engine. A late '70's Trans Am had either a 403 Olds with the auto, or 400 CID Pontiac engine. While one of the quickest cars of the time, a 1979 T/A with the 400 4 speed was a 15.3 sec car in the quarter mile, with a great driver. The Olds 403, normally a mid 16 sec car. The 442 even with the Jetaway 2 speed would have ran better than either of them.

Posted

I remember when we used to use gear venders in our one tons we pulled with. Their advertising was leave the engine stock ad more gears. We did both. They would advertise for every gear split it was like adding up to 50hp. So you math genius figure it out, we started with 3-4 gears now we’re up to 10 and double the HP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

A major change since the 60's is the ease of access to information.  Unless you were keenly interested in a topic and educated yourself through traditional means,  you often relied on the advice given by respected peers and elders.  Now there is a lot of easy reading on the internet regarding torque and horsepower. Consumers are generally better informed and appreciate that these numbers are exceeding  even the potential of being used.  We all want reserve horsepower ("just in case") and appreciate that there is a limit.  I wonder what impact a DIC feature indicating hp being used would have on "hp wars"? 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    
    • Hello Guys I'm new to the form,         I just put a 7-inch Rough Country lift on my 2016 GMC Sierra 1500 with the 5.3 and I also put a Borla exhaust on it. But I noticed when I'm in park or in neutral and then I rev my truck up really quick there is a bad click noise and I think it's coming from the motor somewhere. Anyways I got a video of it I will attach below I was just wondering if you guys think its rod knock or lifter tick or something like that because I know the AFM kind of made the lifters weak on these trucks.       Thanks!!!!! RIP - Chevy 5.3 IMG_6043.mov    
    • We’ll have to agree to disagree. I didn’t experience or know anyone who had a decent car after 100K miles in the 60s through the 80s that were daily commuter vehicles. Unless they were collector vehicles. Of course things cost more due to inflation. But we also make more money. The biggest money drains these days are things people think they need today versus what we require back in the day. Like cell phones and internet as examples. Another example is where you live. Cost of living varies from state to state. I would need twice the money to live in NJ vs Texas in retirement. The car you recently purchased was less than my first car with inflation at 3000$ in 1973. I didn’t have air, electric windows, cruise etc. Purchasing power is equivalent, you just have to do the research. 
    • Sierra HD Pro:   - If you want a power driver's seat on the Pro, you can't get it.  You have to go to SLE.   - Factory remote start?  Can't get it on any of the Sierra Pro trim (1500 or HD).  You have to go SLE.     - 7 inch radio has limitations for replacement if you wanted to upgrade the screen, etc.    - Steering wheel radio controls?  Nope.  Can you add them?  Yes.  NOT CHEAP.  Requires a new instrument cluster, steering wheel and wiring harness mod kit.     - Fog lights?  Nope.  And no factory path to install them.    Sierra HD SLE:   - IMO, the larger radio screen is a much better interface.   - Fog lights?  You can get them.  Steering wheel controls?  Has them.  Remote start?  Yep.  Power driver seat?  Available.       Silverado WT:   - Same as the Pro above however you CAN get factory remote start installed at the dealer for the WT Chevy.     Silverado Custom:   - Comes with 20" wheels only.  Can you swap later?  Sure.  But.  Truck is calibrated for the stock 20s (34" tire) and no path to properly recalibrate.     - Power seat?  Yes.   - Steering wheel controls?  Same as the Pro above.  No but can be done and not cheap.     Silverado LT:   - Same as the SLE.  You can get or it comes with many features you can't do on the lower trims.       I'd say its all going to come down to what you NEED and what you WANT to have that you'd benefit from.  For me, things like power seat is a must (I hate the WT/Pro seating position), so I'd have to go Custom, LT or SLE right out of the gate.  Steering wheel controls?  Should be standard in 2026 across the board IMO, so again, puts me to LT or SLE.  
    • I have a 1500 but the Custom trim. I bought it solely for the simplicity meaning less electronics. I also love the old school gauges. The only thing that I like about the LT better than my Custom is the front grill. Otherwise, absolutely no regrets choosing this trim. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...