Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, DanJS10 said:

Truck looks great! Any rubbing with the 285s?

Thank You! No rubbing at all.

  • Like 1
Posted

These are not stock wheels but with stock Z71 tires (265/65/18). 

 

Rough Country 2 inch front leveling kit. 

IMG_0114.JPG

IMG_0112.JPG

Posted

I did the MotoFab 3/2 Level.  This is before I went up a few tire sizes.  I now run 285/70's on the stock rims.  I haven't had any issues with the leveling kit as of yet.  I've had it on for just under 10K miles.

Before & After Leveling Front 1.jpg

Before & After Leveling Side.jpg

Posted

Here’s mine I just got done yesterday 2f67f822130dc580274d34765b441add.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, 17SLE said:

Here’s mine I just got done yesterday 2f67f822130dc580274d34765b441add.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That a 2.5" up front? Or 2"? 

Posted
That a 2.5" up front? Or 2"? 

It’s a 2.25” pro comp up front. And 285/70/17 mickey Thompson p3


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Just now, 17SLE said:


It’s a 2.25” pro comp up front. And 285/70/17 mickey Thompson p3


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

OK thanks for the quick reply - I missed it by .25" both ways! :D

 

Looks good. 

Posted
2 hours ago, 03msc said:

 

OK thanks for the quick reply - I missed it by .25" both ways! :D

 

Looks good. 

Thanks! I'll be putting my tow mirrors on soon... 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

285/65r18 Falkens on stock GMC Z71 rims with 2.5 RCX level in front, 2" blocks and Rite Rite bags in rear.   32" tall and 11" or so wide with weight of truck on tires.

 

 

reduced May 2018 285s side shot.jpg

reduced May 2018 285s (3).jpg

reduced May 2018 285s (6).jpg

reduced May 2018 285s (7).jpg

Posted

The snow picture is stock dueller ats and the other is with some 33's. Stock rims. 

Sorry the stock tire picture sucks, only one I ever got before changing tires. 

IMG_20171215_180540518.jpg

IMG_4251~2.JPG

Posted
13 hours ago, bcbz71 said:

285/65r18 Falkens on stock GMC Z71 rims with 2.5 RCX level in front, 2" blocks and Rite Rite bags in rear.   32" tall and 11" or so wide with weight of truck on tires.

 

 

reduced May 2018 285s side shot.jpg

reduced May 2018 285s (3).jpg

reduced May 2018 285s (6).jpg

reduced May 2018 285s (7).jpg

I'm curious if you noticed a decrease in mpgs from stock size.

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Tyy1907 said:

I'm curious if you noticed a decrease in mpgs from stock size.

I will need to drive it a tank or two before I will know for sure, but I'm going to guess I will.   They are taller, wider and heavier.    I got about 18.5 with the 275/65r18 Nittos.  I suspect I will drop 1+ mpg

 

BTW, the tires say 33x11.5 on the side.    I've very happy with this size...anything bigger and I would need more lift.  IMO it's the perfect balanced look for a level.

Edited by bcbz71
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Progress... sort of.   Intake is disassembled, spider is out, fuel lines removed. Used a torch on the stripped screw with the lower intake off, much easier when I've got the intake sitting on my workbench, I made it talk. Walked right out with a pair of vice grips once it was nice and toasty hot.   New parts are piling up on my service cart waiting to be installed. Distributor, temperature sensor, new gaskets, fuel line kit, themostat, water neck.   My new pickle is I don't want to spend $600 on a replacement spider. I'm not sure IT is bad. I'm probably splitting hairs. Or it's $300 to send mine away and another 3 weeks of the truck just sitting. I have half a mind to assemble everything with the old spider to see if I can get away with just replacing the fuel pressure regulator to be safe. The obvious issue was the gushing high pressure fuel line which will be replaced. Getting to the spider really isn't that hard, and now I know what I'm doing , swapping it would be a breeze should it absolutely need one. Stupid, or smart?   The part that gives me pause is replacing the distributor. Well, it's already out. And I didn't mark it, whoopsie! Engine was at TDC when I removed it, I know that, so upon correct reinstall the metal tip on the rotor should point to the TDC mark on the distributor because that's where it was pointing on the old distributor. Worst case I'm a tooth off and have to re-stab it.   But then, what? I assume the truck will start. It doesn't appear the timing can be set. Here's the problem: These distributors can't be rotated but a degree or two, by design. What I read is Cam ****** needs to be -2 to +2 degrees, ideally at 0 (and checked/set above 1000 rpm). There should be enough wiggle to get that properly set, but checking the reported value is another potential issue. My Actron 9185 scanner says it supports enhanced GM PIDs and Cam ****** is one of them but it's unclear that I'll be able to correctly see it over OBD 1.5. I can see why people end up junking these things with life left in them. They're an absolute nightmare with tweener-year diagnostics/electronics and unobtanium parts.   Fingers crossed it starts and idles nicely. There can be hope, right? I'ma buy a lottery ticket the same day just in case.   Next steps..DO IT. I have not installed an intake before so I've been reading and watching a lot. Some say NO RTV except on china walls, some say DO RTV on water ports but not fuel/air intake. 1/4 or 3/8 bead on China walls? I think my strategy will be, obviously, RTV china walls with overlap on the gasket corners. Chapstick-style RTV the water ports. Leave intake ports dry. The only set of intake gaskets I could find locally are Edelbrock performance gaskets (uh...for an asthmatic 190hp V6? LOL) so we'll see how they do.   #NoToolLeftBehind. It took an hour, but my recovery mission for my deep 10mm socket was successful. It had rolled down the bellhousing and wedged itself between what I think are the fuel lines? I couldn't see it at all, but with a junk antenna I had laying around, I blindly went poking/sweeping for it, heard it clink, raised the truck, and caught a sliver glimpse of chrome with a flashlight way up there in Narnia. I had pushed it farther along the lines holding it captive, but within access of severely improvised tools, poking and cursing at it to finally knock it free to where I could get a fingertip on it to bring it home.    Not much to see.      
    • Thats crazy considering im right next door (Indiana)
    • For a limited time, retail and commercial accounts receive an AMSOIL Vinyl Tool Tray with their order of $500 or more when they use code TRAY726 at checkout. The promotion runs through July 21, 2026.   Order at https://syntheticadvantage.com   Want to use AMSOIL in your business or sell at your store, apply here.  https://www.amsoil.com/business-opportunities/?zo=521390  
    • It wouldn’t have happened if the government hadn’t mandated outrageous fuel mileage standards. It does very little for the consumer. It adds cost. Back during Covid there was a chip shortage. They gave a rebate for your truck if it didn’t have the chip to turn on cylinder deactivation. It was 50$ because at best you may see 1/2 a mile increase per gallon. Splitting hairs each fuel mileage trick wasn’t mandated. The government doesn’t do the engineering work and say use this until it’s already in use and they like it. The fuel mileage was mandated. And those add ons the results. There’s a mandate and they are the results.
    • It was never mandated.  Ever.    Automakers were incentivized to install it by getting CAFE credits to help with their vehicle fleet fuel economy scores.  They were being handed money/CAFE credits to install it.  Which is NOT a mandate.       The current admin removed the incentives that were behind them installing it.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...