Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Black02Silverado said:

Terry said it should be below 10.  As you can see it has never gotten that low.

Interesting. Thanks. Mine was 12 so I'll have to listen to the recordings again. Love this thread. A place to learn. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Last:

2009 Silverado

  • 24 Nov 2018
  • 75,709 miles
  • 6 quarts Quaker State Ultimate Durability 5W-30 full-synthetic motor oil
  • Last AC Delco PF48 (NOT PF48E e-core!) oil filter from my cache.  
  • 9% remaining on Oil Life Monitor.
  • Also greased 2 tie rod end zerks with Valvoline full synthetic grease.  
  • Tapped out AC Delco A3181C air filter.  (replace every 33k miles)
  • And did last rotation on worn out factory OEM Bridgestone Dueler A/T RH-S tires before replacing with Dueler H/L Alenza Plus in same size. 
  • Uses less oil with Quaker State Ultimate Durability than it did with Pennzoil Platinum.  

 

Next up:

2009 Silverado

  • 25 May 2019
  • estimated ~80,000 miles
  • 6 quarts new Shell Gas Truck all-mileage full-synthetic 5W-30 motor oil
  • Wix 57060 oil filter
  • estimated 0% left on OLM
  • Always grease 2 tie rod end zerks at every oil change and tap out air filter.  
  • Will use Mobil1 full synthetic grease for next manual grease gun cartridge replacement.  
  • Used approx. 2 quarts in between oil changes (infamous AFM oil usage problem; TSB performed, AFM turned off at 36,000 miles).  Hoping it will use even less oil with Shell Gas Truck (similar additive pack as to their diesel oil, to clean fouled piston oil control rings) than it did with Quaker State UD.  
Edited by MaverickZ71
  • Like 2
Posted

05/10/19

2019 Silverado CC standard bed

6.2l

2 gallons of AMSOIL OE 0w-20

PF63E oil filter

3287 total miles

64% OLM

 

Also changed out 3.2pints from transfer case and filled back up with AMSOIL ATL

The new squeeze package makes it so much easier.

  • Like 2
Posted

What the E filter? I bought a PF63F for mine




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Posted
1 hour ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

What the E filter? I bought a PF63F for mine




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

The F designates a case lot of the PF63. At least that's they way all our filters we purchase for our trucks. PF48F, PF63F.....that's what is on the case box

Posted (edited)

The non Ecore PF 63 filters have the lower by-pass setting.  GM went to the Ecore  when they increased the by-pass to 22psi. 

Edited by Black02Silverado
  • Like 1
Posted

5/17/2019

Pepper 262 CID V-6 

90,000 miles

5,000 OCI

6 Quarts Red Line 0W30 High Performance

Cleaned K & P oil filter

 

Seems the 0W20 was frothing (aerating) in the warmer weather (oil temperature over 200F) at higher RPM (above 2500 rpm). Had not been an issue until air temperatures exceeded 80 F. Not foam (water) froth (air). It would reach proper pressure then fade and/or fluctuate. SAE 30 seems to have cured this. 125 mile test run plus a few hard passes with the data system active. 

 

Note: Absolute peak pressure difference between 0W20 and 0W30 is less than 2 psig. No surprise there. Actual 212 F vis is less than 2 cSt different. 

 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

6/20/2019

Pepper 262 CID V-6

95,000 miles

5K OCI

K&P filter clean 6 quarts Red Line High Performance 0W20.

Installed cooler 170 F thermostat and between the last two changes had the oil pressure checked. 

It was instrument issues not oil froth so back to the W20. 

For others: the 0W30 performed excellently. 

  • Like 1
Posted

6/27/2019

2014 Terrain 2.4

95,000 miles

5K OCI

5 Quarts Red Line 0W30 and NAPA Gold filter. 

5W30 Mobil 1 showed no reduction in usage. 3/4 quart in 5K. 

Nick AMSOIL is up next. Need lowest NOACK. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Grumpy Bear said:

6/27/2019

2014 Terrain 2.4

95,000 miles

5K OCI

5 Quarts Red Line 0W30 and NAPA Gold filter. 

5W30 Mobil 1 showed no reduction in usage. 3/4 quart in 5K. 

Nick AMSOIL is up next. Need lowest NOACK. 

The SS 5w-20 is 5.8 and the 10w-30 is 4.1 NOACK.  So the 10w-30 is the lowest in the SS line.

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

9/7/2019

2015 Silverado RCSB 4.3

100,541 miles (5,674 OCI) Oil use zero measurable. 

3 quarts 0W20 & 3 quarts 5W20. Red Line. Just working off some obsolete stock. No special brews. 

Clean K&P stainless filter. 

8 quarts of Red Line D6 in a drop and fill. 95.5% Red Line 4.5% AC-Delco now. 4th drop and fill. No filter change this time. 

Drop and fill differential AMSOIL 75W90 Severe Gear.  

Full 100K service details in my build thread. 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

9/7/2019

2015 Silverado RCSB 4.3

100,541 miles (5,674 OCI) Oil use zero measurable. 

3 quarts 0W20 & 3 quarts 5W20. Red Line. Just working off some obsolete stock. No special brews. 

Clean K&P stainless filter. 

8 quarts of Red Line D6 in a drop and fill. 95.5% Red Line 4.5% AC-Delco now. 4th drop and fill. No filter change this time. 

Drop and fill differential AMSOIL 75W90 Severe Gear.  

Full 100K service details in my build thread. 

Have you change plugs ??  I'm at 92,500 routing service , New Radiator w Thermostat & AC Condenser ( GM cover it ) other wise runs great .

Posted
21 minutes ago, slj2008 said:

Have you change plugs ??  I'm at 92,500 routing service , New Radiator w Thermostat & AC Condenser ( GM cover it ) other wise runs great .

Yes AC-Delco 41-114. .040" gap. Wires as well. It's all in my build thread. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Yes AC-Delco 41-114. .040" gap. Wires as well. It's all in my build thread. 

Thank You for the info .

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

09/20/2019
2014 Chevy Cruze Diesel
2.0l
4.75qts of AMSOIL DHD 5w-30
Wix WL10021 oil filter, AMSOIL does not have a filter for this vehicle.
7,416 miles on oil
84,016 total miles
0% OLM

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...