Jump to content

Silverado Rough Ride

cbpagent72
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

OnTheReel
OnTheReel

The LTs with the 5.3 have a composite rear leaf spring, as referenced in the compatibility guide for the 2” factory lift. So there is a difference there.    Between loaners and my own, I’ve spe

Rocz3cqg
Rocz3cqg

I have a 2019 Silverado HC with Z71 option. The vehicle rides better than my former 2016 Silverado LTZ Z71. Does it ride better that a GMC Denali....No or a Ram high end Truck....No but the Silverado

oldmann
oldmann

This could be the single stupidest thread on this forum.  The suspension will loosen up after a few thousand miles and these are trucks.  They ride rougher than cars.  20" or 22" wheels are worse that

Posted Images

oldmann Senior Enthusiast

oldmann

Posted
Posted

This could be the single stupidest thread on this forum.  The suspension will loosen up after a few thousand miles and these are trucks.  They ride rougher than cars.  20" or 22" wheels are worse that 17" or 18".  Run the correct tire pressure depending on you load.

The End.

  • Like 2
Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, oldmann said:

This could be the single stupidest thread on this forum.  The suspension will loosen up after a few thousand miles and these are trucks.  They ride rougher than cars.  20" or 22" wheels are worse that 17" or 18".  Run the correct tire pressure depending on you load.

The End.

Agree, nothing wrong with the suspension on the '19s. Stiff and bouncy with 22"s when new. Road force balanced the wheels after 1K, a few heavy loads, tow of the boat up and down the hill, and 2K miles later the rear leafs loosened up nicely.

 

Now, runs as nice or better than my '16Z71 with 17" wheels.

  • Like 1
Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted

Cars and SUVs are designed to haul people and luggage; pickup trucks are designed to haul people,  rocks, lumber and manure. So it is impractical if not stupid to expect anywhere near car ride comfort out of a truck.

 

A case of genes - Avalanches with rear coil springs were the closest a same cost class pickup will ever get to a car/SUV ride. The most successful way to get a better ride out of a leaf spring Silverado is to trade it in for a rear spring Suburban - anything short of that will be less successful - you can't turn a white horse into a zebra no matter how many black stripes you paint on it, nor paint a zebra like a horse to get it to run a racetrack.

  • Like 2
MacLaren Enthusiast

MacLaren

Posted
Posted (edited)

My LT Crew has been good since I bought it, and since getting a little over 4k miles, she has gotten better too. 

From what I've been reading, the LT models do ride the best. 

I think it's because they are made a little different from the RST models - a different spring or something, I cant hardly remember. 

It makes sense as mine rides very,very, well. 

Mine is a Z71 as well. 

 

Edited by MacLaren
Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted

 

 

6 minutes ago, MacLaren said:

My LT Crew has been good since I bought it, and since getting a little over 4k miles, she has gotten better too. 

From what I've been reading, the LT models do ride the best. 

I think it's because they are made a little different from the RST models - a different spring or something, I cant hardly remember. 

It makes sense as mine rides very,very, well. 

Mine is a Z71 as well. 

 

LTs and RSTs have the same suspension, it is the Z71 variants that differ from both base models, primarily in the rear suspension/Rancho shocks. After my '16 LT Z71 I purposely stayed away from another, those knobby Goodyear tires were great off road in heavy snow or mud, but handled like crap in turns on wet pavement, the front slid and rear end would break out on hairpins even in AWD or 4WD. Stock suspension on '19 RST with high performance conventional sipe tires handles better in turns more so with low profile sidewall 22s over the Z71s high profile knobby 17s. Handling difference is not only in gripping like a cat, but in reduced body lean and nose diving admittedly at the expense of a harsher ride. Road force balance and a few thousand miles to loosen up the suspension has made it no worse than the ride on the former Z71's knobby tires. Wait until the miles and age build up on the Z71 tires and it is slide-o-rama on pavement turns, worse, they get noisy, and the large blocks in the "treads" begin to feather toward the rear edges (frequent, very frequent,  cross tire rotation, not front to back, is necessary to compensate for this type of wear pattern).

 

Can't say how much of the latter might be attributable to the '19 body style over my '16 , but the comparison tire/wheel performance and grip of 22" Alenzas in emergency maneuvers and hairpin turns over the knobby Goodyears is nothing short of incredible..surprisingly so.....truck is as close as possible to handing if not in comfort as a sedan/SUV.

oldmann Senior Enthusiast

oldmann

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Thomcat said:

 

 

LTs and RSTs have the same suspension, it is the Z71 variants that differ from both base models, primarily in the rear suspension/Rancho shocks. After my '16 LT Z71 I purposely stayed away from another, those knobby Goodyear tires were great off road in heavy snow or mud, but handled like crap in turns on wet pavement, the front slid and rear end would break out on hairpins even in AWD or 4WD. Stock suspension on '19 RST with high performance conventional sipe tires handles better in turns more so with low profile sidewall 22s over the Z71s high profile knobby 17s. Handling difference is not only in gripping like a cat, but in reduced body lean and nose diving admittedly at the expense of a harsher ride. Road force balance and a few thousand miles to loosen up the suspension has made it no worse than the ride on the former Z71's knobby tires. Wait until the miles and age build up on the Z71 tires and it is slide-o-rama on pavement turns, worse, they get noisy, and the large blocks in the "treads" begin to feather toward the rear edges (frequent, very frequent,  cross tire rotation, not front to back, is necessary to compensate for this type of wear pattern).

 

Can't say how much of the latter might be attributable to the '19 body style over my '16 , but the comparison tire/wheel performance and grip of 22" Alenzas in emergency maneuvers and hairpin turns over the knobby Goodyears is nothing short of incredible..surprisingly so.....truck is as close as possible to handing if not in comfort as a sedan/SUV.

I rotate the tires every oil change or 6000 miles.  They stay in good shape that way and do not wear unevenly.  

  • Like 1
OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted

The LTs with the 5.3 have a composite rear leaf spring, as referenced in the compatibility guide for the 2” factory lift. So there is a difference there. 
 

Between loaners and my own, I’ve spent at least a few days driving each of the 3 suspension packages on these 2019s on the same routes. All three have exhibited much more wayward / tailhappy behavior over broken roads than my 2016 with the base suspension ever did. This is not the only factor in ride quality, but it seems to be the main complaint when it comes to these trucks vs the last generation. All in all, I’m happy with the ride of my NHT, but it does kick out and bounce around occasionally on rough crossings, even after 8500 miles. This can be disconcerting for people who are only getting into their first truck, and I believe it is likely the main reason they retuned the suspension for 2020.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Doolin-Dalton Enthusiast

Doolin-Dalton

Posted
Posted
On 1/4/2019 at 11:41 AM, cbpagent72 said:

 

I'm coming from a 2018 ZR2 and the ride in the Silverado is very bouncy and rough compared to the smooth as silk ZR2. I have never felt a vehicle ride this bouncy that didn't have bad struts. Do any of you have the same experience?

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

No and sorry this is happening to you.  I have a 2019 Trail Boss, Custom Trim, Z71 with the Goodyear DuraTrac tires.  The ride is very quiet and smooth like a car.  The rear end does hop a little if you hit a bump while going thru a turn at speeds above 40mph, but I thought that was common for most trucks with leaf springs? 

Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted

.02 People are driving these more like cars than trucks with a few passengers and very little weight in the bed so the rear springs never get a workout. Seems the springs may need a little flexing under load to free up the sliding movement of the ends of the leafs, and a little oil spray didn't hurt, especially after sitting with that crap they spray on. When new mine  rode like there was only a single leaf. Couldn't have been just road force balance that helped with the ride of the 22s, 2K+ miles a load of firewood and towing the boat sure flexed the springs especially when going up hills. Suspension is just right now, any looser and it would see-saw towing over humped RR crossings. Workout mellowed the ride right out, even rides better now when unloaded with just the front passengers.

 

Want a real gut busting ride? Take out the Ford flatbed loaner from Home Depot.

  • 2 weeks later...
Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted
On 10/11/2019 at 11:37 AM, OnTheReel said:

The LTs with the 5.3 have a composite rear leaf spring, as referenced in the compatibility guide for the 2” factory lift. So there is a difference there. 
 

Between loaners and my own, I’ve spent at least a few days driving each of the 3 suspension packages on these 2019s on the same routes. All three have exhibited much more wayward / tailhappy behavior over broken roads than my 2016 with the base suspension ever did. This is not the only factor in ride quality, but it seems to be the main complaint when it comes to these trucks vs the last generation. All in all, I’m happy with the ride of my NHT, but it does kick out and bounce around occasionally on rough crossings, even after 8500 miles. This can be disconcerting for people who are only getting into their first truck, and I believe it is likely the main reason they retuned the suspension for 2020.

If they retuned the suspension for 2020, funny they didn't bother to mention it.

 

http://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/chevrolet/silverado/2020-chevrolet-silverado/2020-chevrolet-silverado-changes-updates-new-features/

 

  • Confused 1
OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Thomcat said:

If they retuned the suspension for 2020, funny they didn't bother to mention it.

 

http://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/chevrolet/silverado/2020-chevrolet-silverado/2020-chevrolet-silverado-changes-updates-new-features/

 

Well, that’s not even a GM-operated website, but I’m guessing one wouldn’t necessarily advertise this because doing so would basically admit that the 19s could have been better?

 

Nevertheless:


https://www.motortrend.com/cars/gmc/sierra-1500/2020/2020-gmc-sierra-1500-duramax-first-drive-review

 

“The GM engineers on hand told us the entire lineup of half-tons had their suspensions (both front coils and leaf rear springs) retuned for the 2020 model year, mostly due to customer feedback.“

Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

Well, that’s not even a GM-operated website, but I’m guessing one wouldn’t necessarily advertise this because doing so would basically admit that the 19s could have been better?

 

Nevertheless:


https://www.motortrend.com/cars/gmc/sierra-1500/2020/2020-gmc-sierra-1500-duramax-first-drive-review

 

“The GM engineers on hand told us the entire lineup of half-tons had their suspensions (both front coils and leaf rear springs) retuned for the 2020 model year, mostly due to customer feedback.“

Boils down to a matter whether to believe either one of them or my lying eyes. To early to check replacement numbers, so next time at the dealer, it's flat on my back pulling numbers off the springs of a '20 RST for comparison against mine. Other models too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Z45
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By Z45 · Posted

      Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • KARNUT
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • Atlas
      Missing thrust bearing? And oil selection

      By Atlas · Posted

      There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • Z45
      Castrol Edge VS Amsoil OE

      By Z45 · Posted

      1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...