Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Michaelc607 said:

I don’t want to get my dealership in trouble they are more than doing their part they want it fixed and out of their shop as bad as I do gm is the culprit here not my dealership

Everyone needs to call the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration. They are the ones that made GM do the recall on the 3.8 million 14 to 18 models. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Michaelc607 said:

My truck is having the same issues at 199 miles and the truck has been in my possession for less than 24 hours gm won’t help at all truck has been in the shop for 3 weeks now and no end in sight and my service manager told me today the parts they need were on back order even before the strike and that’s only gonna hold more things up I have an appt to speak with an attorney tomorrow the gm cac people are advising a buy back for a small 7,000 dollar loss on a truck that I haven’t even put 100 miles on yet gm is a bunch or crooks my first gm truck and I guarantee it’ll be my last 

That is absolutely crazy!  That is like $35 per mile.  Not even equitable.  I wonder if you could go back void your contract since it was returned within most states 72 rescission period. 

Posted (edited)

I also just lost my brakes on 2019 Silverado RST on 9/20/2019.  Luckily just pulling out gas station.  I was able to drive it to the dealer but no power to brakes, had to press super hard to stop and even then was not fast.  Quickly after GM sent a text message about servicing my ABS and the check engine light came on about servicing the ABS and not driving over 65mph.  Dealer said two recalls on file and one was brake related, go figure.  Very disappointing.  Then I get a loaner and they say I can’t tow my boat with it to go fishing over the weekend, wtf.  Might have to rethink my next truck manufacturer.  

 

Update: Bought my truck December 2018 and has around 7K miles.

Edited by Tim247
Posted

I took the vehicle in because of the brakes recall Tuesday, 17, September 2019.Today is Saturday 21,September, 2019.So today I was driving to work. I was making a left turn onto the ramp. I slowed down then the brakes seemed to not work again. I made the turn and rims rubbing the curb. Narrowly missing other vehicles. Then I saw the anti lock, stabili Trac, info display and the texts on my phone about servicing the brakes and stabilitrack  
"Diagnostic Alert: Service the StabiliTrak stability control system in your 2016 Silverado within 7 days. Txt STOP to cancel." " 
Diagnostic Alert: Service the Antilock Braking System in your 2016 Silverado within 7 days. Txt STOP to cancel." I took it to the dealership and they said I have to pay for a diagnostic and possible repairs. Let's see how it goes. I have the video. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Tim247 said:

I also just lost my brakes on 2019 Silverado RST on 9/20/2019.  Luckily just pulling out gas station.  I was able to drive it to the dealer but no power to brakes, had to press super hard to stop and even then was not fast.  Quickly after GM sent a text message about servicing my ABS and the check engine light came on about servicing the ABS and not driving over 65mph.  Dealer said two recalls on file and one was brake related, go figure.  Very disappointing.  Then I get a loaner and they say I can’t tow my boat with it to go fishing over the weekend, wtf.  Might have to rethink my next truck manufacturer.  

Was yours an early build by chance? I checked the TSB for the brakes that people have been posting but it looks like it was issued before my build date so I dunno if it applies to me.

Posted
48 minutes ago, batman900 said:

Was yours an early build by chance? I checked the TSB for the brakes that people have been posting but it looks like it was issued before my build date so I dunno if it applies to me.

I don’t know when mine was built I drove it home from the dealership on 9/21 then got in it the next day and haven’t seen it for 30+ days now. GM is acting’s like a butt now. They don’t take any responsibility. They want to put the burden on the dealership. I live in VA but bought mine in WV so I filed a complaint with the WV Attorney General on Friday. I hope that gets their attention. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Philip said:

I don’t know when mine was built I drove it home from the dealership on 9/21 then got in it the next day and haven’t seen it for 30+ days now. GM is acting’s like a butt now. They don’t take any responsibility. They want to put the burden on the dealership. I live in VA but bought mine in WV so I filed a complaint with the WV Attorney General on Friday. I hope that gets their attention. 

Put you vin in the my chevy app and login. It will show you your vehicle's location for free. No subscription needed. That is if the vehicle has power. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Djchris said:

Put you vin in the my chevy app and login. It will show you your vehicle's location for free. No subscription needed. That is if the vehicle has power. 

The vehicle has not been turned in over 20 days it tells me to start the vehicle. Nothing is being done no ETA on part. They were 8 weeks behind before the strike. 

Posted

To give everyone an update.  The dealer replaced the master cylinder and brake controller on my truck and returned it to me  Tuesday the 25th which as a result means they had my truck for two weeks while it was waiting on parts.  After driving the truck about 10 miles with the truck Tuesday it lost brake assist and is now back at the dealership with no ETA.  This isn't looking very good from my perspective.  Has anyone else out there had there master cylinder replaced and is still experiencing the same issue?

Posted
43 minutes ago, 2019chevyguy said:

To give everyone an update.  The dealer replaced the master cylinder and brake controller on my truck and returned it to me  Tuesday the 25th which as a result means they had my truck for two weeks while it was waiting on parts.  After driving the truck about 10 miles with the truck Tuesday it lost brake assist and is now back at the dealership with no ETA.  This isn't looking very good from my perspective.  Has anyone else out there had there master cylinder replaced and is still experiencing the same issue?

My vehicle has now been in the garage 35 days awaiting a Master Cylinder. They are telling me parts are not available. I’m surprised you got any parts since they are on strike. Evidently they took a Master Cylinder off another faulty vehicle on the lot to try to fix your problem. 

Posted

Wish me luck then. I have a 12 hour trip on Saturday (one way only) then back a few days afterwards. Then I’m moving a 9000 lbs travel trailer. I’ve had my brake issue already so I hope it doesn’t repeat itself. 
 

All they did to fix mine was bleed the brakes a few times and reprogram the computer... 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Rod S said:

Wish me luck then. I have a 12 hour trip on Saturday (one way only) then back a few days afterwards. Then I’m moving a 9000 lbs travel trailer. I’ve had my brake issue already so I hope it doesn’t repeat itself. 
 

All they did to fix mine was bleed the brakes a few times and reprogram the computer... 

Best of luck. I don’t think I would tow anything with those problems. GM is going to have to do something before someone gets killed or runs over someone because they can’t stop. 

Posted

Add me to the list of those with a '19 AT4 and "Service Brake Assist" issues. Dealership has been trying to track my failure down since 7/19. Finally, this week, they say that GM wants them to replace the master cylinder. Now, the big wait is for parts especially with the strike going on.

 

I've had a case open with GM Customer Care for the last few weeks.

Posted
6 minutes ago, mistergmc said:

Add me to the list of those with a '19 AT4 and "Service Brake Assist" issues. Dealership has been trying to track my failure down since 7/19. Finally, this week, they say that GM wants them to replace the master cylinder. Now, the big wait is for parts especially with the strike going on.

 

I've had a case open with GM Customer Care for the last few weeks.

GM customer care is horrible. They read scripts...I finally got someone from the so-called executive office and they said they would not do anything for me. This is horrible get on Twitter and post about them they hate it. My user name is ruenviro we all need to bond together and get this out on social media as much as possible so something can be done. 

Posted
On ‎9‎/‎19‎/‎2019 at 6:02 PM, Michaelc607 said:

My truck is having the same issues at 199 miles and the truck has been in my possession for less than 24 hours gm won’t help at all truck has been in the shop for 3 weeks now and no end in sight and my service manager told me today the parts they need were on back order even before the strike and that’s only gonna hold more things up I have an appt to speak with an attorney tomorrow the gm cac people are advising a buy back for a small 7,000 dollar loss on a truck that I haven’t even put 100 miles on yet gm is a bunch or crooks my first gm truck and I guarantee it’ll be my last 

The reason for the $7K hit on the value of the truck is because the truck has been registered and is now considered used. So the dealership can't take it back, fix the issue and sell it as a new vehicle, which means they can't use any of the GM rebates or low finance rates. It would have to be sold as a 'used' vehicle at used vehicle finance rates. So the sale price of the truck would have to be low enough so the payments on it (at used vehicle rates) would be lower than a new one, otherwise no one would ever buy it.

 

That doesn't make it right though. If this is a true 'buying it back" by GM themselves, there shouldn't be any loss for you in that short of time and low miles. If it is a dealer having to take it back and reverse the deal, then the above reason I mentioned would likely apply. I would make sure it is GM themselves buying it back and get 100% back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...