Jump to content

Roof Leak from Shark Fin (Digital Radio Antenna)

hamooz
 Share

Recommended Posts

SS502 Senior Enthusiast

SS502

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, silverado2k18 said:

my 2018 has the gap towards the back, with wifi.  my buddy's 2018 has the gap towards the front, with wifi.   same year.......

Of course! Sorry, MOST of the newer trucks have it in the front. It's not a water seal but for some reason GM started putting the gap towards the front. I plan on putting a sealant around the base of mine, hopefully it will stop water from getting to the seal inside that is SUPPOSED to keep the water out.

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

dsr611
dsr611

Just a few of the many topics on the roof leaking around the antenna... https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/217719-shark-fin-antenna-swap-observstions-and-why-they-leak/ https://www.gm-tr

imiller1974
imiller1974

The dealer "replaced/fixed" it under warranty. It leaked again within a month of them working on it...So, I fixed it myself for the price of a tube of RTV/silicone.   Remove the A pillar tri

Donstar
Donstar

My antenna leaked and was repaired while under warranty.  It leaked again, post warranty, and my dealer replaced it at no charge.  They service manager said the new one is a better design and I should

Posted Images

RACERX7775 Enthusiast

RACERX7775

Posted
Posted

I guess GM designed the seal and said, we know this is gonna fail so lets design it so when water gets it, it can get out too? WTF? Id like to know the real reason why its designed like it is..

2003 SSEi Enthusiast

2003 SSEi

Posted
Posted

The Rubber with the gap, is not a seal.  It is simply a way to attach the antenna to the roof, and have a good contour and not have any paint wear or direct contact from the plastic of the antenna to the roof. 

 

As pointed out, you should not silicon the OUTER section of the antenna, as the gap is designed to let water/air out.  The correct way is to remove the antenna, and use a silicon/RTV/whatever you want in addition to the foam seal.

 

here are some pics from my thread

 

I never had a leak in 90K miles as you can obviously see here.  You can see the outer rubber of the antenna, and then the inner seal area.

09D2B601-D49A-4829-AFCB-391968D5E488.jpeg

 

 

This is the Foam seal that actually does all the work to keep the water out

22A6FA13-2622-4C09-AD2B-F0AD56A16F27.jpeg

 

The only reason I swapped was to go from the 14 Non painted Antenna on my Denali to the 15+ Painted antenna

g2full Enthusiast

g2full

Posted
Posted

Has anyone tried using stip caulk/dum dum/whatever everyone calls it? I think that's what I'm gonna try on mine when I take it off to "improve".

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
hamooz Enthusiast

hamooz

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thank you y'all of your help.

 

My technician friend came last week and resealed the thing. We had to remove the headliner to have an access to the antenna. 

 

I used "GE All Purpose Silicone - Clear" to reseal the stupid fin.

 

I hope the leak will stop permanently. However, I did lose my signal for the XM radio. It says "Receiption may be blocked".

 

My just re-activated the membership and tried to refresh the signal multiple times, but still no signal.

 

I'm not sure what is really the cause of the connection issue. We made sure every wire were properly re-connected. I suspect the antenna has been defective after the leaking occurred. 

 

Shame on you GM! trying to save some money to build and install cheap parts leading to major issues. :fume:

IMG_20190223_204100.jpg

hamooz Enthusiast

hamooz

Posted
  • Author
Posted
23 hours ago, RACERX7775 said:

Did it say it was blocked before you removed the antenna?

No, XM radio was working before I removed it.

RACERX7775 Enthusiast

RACERX7775

Posted
Posted

Well, either you blobbed to much on or you damaged the connector.  Its gotta come apart again to see what happened. You didnt take the antenna apart did you? Its just the one bolt right? This is on my 14, i think the newer ones are a tad different because of the wifi..

20180911_163627.jpg

hamooz Enthusiast

hamooz

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 2/26/2019 at 9:36 AM, RACERX7775 said:

Well, either you blobbed to much on or you damaged the connector.  Its gotta come apart again to see what happened. You didnt take the antenna apart did you? Its just the one bolt right? This is on my 14, i think the newer ones are a tad different because of the wifi..

20180911_163627.jpg

That's what I think too. I might blobbed too much but I don't think I damaged the connector.  

II just loosened the bolt that holds the antenna, I did not fully remove it.

 

I will just by another antenna and I hope that will fix the problem.

  • 3 weeks later...
hamooz Enthusiast

hamooz

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
On 3/1/2019 at 11:57 AM, RACERX7775 said:

Why buy a new one. Take it off, peel the stuff off, reapply just enough to seal it.

We worked on it last weekend. We checked the wiring and try to remove the excessive rtv.

 

However, after several attempts, it still says "signal may be blocked" . I refreshed the signal multiple times through the XM website, but the antenna did not pick up any signal.

 

I ended up putting a new antenna. As soon as I connected it, "signal may be blocked" was disappeared . I finally got my XM radio working back after refreshing the signal with the new fin.

 

It costs me overall over $100 to fix the stupid leak and to restore the signal:

$10 for the clear RTV and the Caulking Gun

$50 for the new antenna (part # 23258394)

$50 for the labor cost that I paid for my technician friend

 

If I were going to the dealer to handle it, they would charge me nearly $300 to reseal it.

Edited by hamooz
  • 2 months later...
Ridgerunner30 Enthusiast

Ridgerunner30

Posted
Posted

So it started raining inside the truck on Sunday.  2015 Silverado.  I removed the shark fin antenna.  Cleaned up the sealing surfaces and applied pure silicone sealant.  We'll see how long this works.  A hole in the roof is not a very bright idea.  

  • 5 years later...
HotRodDan New Member

HotRodDan

Posted
Posted

I have the same issue with my 2018 Equinox. Spare tire tub fills up with water when it rains hard. I've been wondering if my sunroof had been leaking cuz I had water in the back seat floor area as well. Could be more extensive than originally anticipated.

Not sure the reason or cause but I've noticed this came all of a sudden after I've been running my car through the automatic car wash. It's the one with the rotating flapping pads or strips. And those flaps beat on the sunroof and shark fin antenna. I may think twice about that particular type of brushless car wash once I finally get my leaking roof fixed.

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, HotRodDan said:

I have the same issue with my 2018 Equinox. Spare tire tub fills up with water when it rains hard. I've been wondering if my sunroof had been leaking cuz I had water in the back seat floor area as well. Could be more extensive than originally anticipated.

Not sure the reason or cause but I've noticed this came all of a sudden after I've been running my car through the automatic car wash. It's the one with the rotating flapping pads or strips. And those flaps beat on the sunroof and shark fin antenna. I may think twice about that particular type of brushless car wash once I finally get my leaking roof fixed.

Put some clear RTV around the antenna and that should stop the leak.  Continued use of those car washes will tear the RTV off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...