Jump to content

Weird MPG


Recommended Posts

Posted

This is my first silverado but not my first truck or vehicle. 2015 LT double cab 4.3l with the active engine cylinder shutdown.

I notice that my MPG fluctuated and changes a ton. For example on long trips when on highway I usually lock in cruise around 70 mph and I can get anywhere from 25-28 mpg depending on traffic and weather. 

In the city I get anywhere from 12 to 18 mpg. I am not a speeder and not someone who launches off the line. I've only owned it for a month now but I feel like I really bounced all over. 

Am i the only one?

Posted

Yeah whenever I switch over to the mpg (which btw I hate that it doesnt stay up or read out with the speedometer) it's usually in v4 mode. Some of it probably is the winter fuel blend and cause I use my remote starter all the time 

Posted

Just be sure your measuring it pump to pump as opposed to what the display tells you. You probably are - but making sure.  :thumbs:

Posted
18 hours ago, Dersch said:

This is my first silverado but not my first truck or vehicle. 2015 LT double cab 4.3l with the active engine cylinder shutdown.

I notice that my MPG fluctuated and changes a ton. For example on long trips when on highway I usually lock in cruise around 70 mph and I can get anywhere from 25-28 mpg depending on traffic and weather. 

In the city I get anywhere from 12 to 18 mpg. I am not a speeder and not someone who launches off the line. I've only owned it for a month now but I feel like I really bounced all over. 

Am i the only one?

I have a similar truck and enjoy challenging the mpg (L/100km) feature!  I can get really poor mileage when delivering meals to shut-ins during the winter or aggressively driving in the summer while pulling my travel trailer.  My best occurs when I keep to the speed limit on the highway with no cargo.  You will undoubtedly notice a considerable improvement over any older full-sized truck you have owned.  I have owned 6cyl American trucks from the past few decades and they pale in comparison to the power and economy of this particular engine.  You are much more aware of it now that you have this information displayed in front of you.

Posted

Also if you remote start it to warm up, MPG are all over the place , In the winter my MPG at full tank are under 600mi in the summer if I fill up ,and have been doing alot of highway driving, D.I.C. shows 675 miles to empty , This is on my company GMC sierra with 4.3

Posted
20 hours ago, Dersch said:

This is my first silverado but not my first truck or vehicle. 2015 LT double cab 4.3l with the active engine cylinder shutdown.

I notice that my MPG fluctuated and changes a ton. For example on long trips when on highway I usually lock in cruise around 70 mph and I can get anywhere from 25-28 mpg depending on traffic and weather. 

In the city I get anywhere from 12 to 18 mpg. I am not a speeder and not someone who launches off the line. I've only owned it for a month now but I feel like I really bounced all over. 

Am i the only one?

 

19 hours ago, Dersch said:

Yeah whenever I switch over to the mpg (which btw I hate that it doesnt stay up or read out with the speedometer) it's usually in v4 mode. Some of it probably is the winter fuel blend and cause I use my remote starter all the time 

You've answered your own question. City v Highway. Winter use of remote start. There is only a 2% difference in fuel BTU values between summer/winter blends. There is a huge difference in initial start up oil viscosity and the length of time it takes to reach 'normal' conditions. Wife drives her Terrain in the winter for work using remote start allot and tends to drive like she stole it and gets 19-22 mpg. I drive it OTR for 300 miles and get 32 mpg like punching a clock. Driving style is huge being the point. We all tend to be a bit more aggressive when we have good traction and are comfortable. Your situation isn't weird at all. Just plain normal. :rolleyes:

Posted

i found to get better mpg in V4 mode when used in conjunction with tow haul. 

Run the truck in drive, as soon as it goes into  V4 i quickly tap tow haul, this will hold v4 mode longer and keep it from dropping back into v8 ...i get a little increase in mpg on flat level roads.

Posted

I think Grumpy hit the Bullseye...DRIVING STYLE! I have never seen below 14 mpg on my 6.2 but I drive within the law...most of the time ? and I don’t utilize all that power getting to the next stop light. Now don’t get me wrong, there are times when conditions dictate I can be a little less conservative and I let her loose. That however is a rarity. I also used L7 vs Drive 90% for the time to avoid V4 mode, not because of needing all 8 cylinders but because I just don’t trust the AFM from causing damage or contributing to lifter failure. I now have the Range AFM disabler. 4, 6 or 8 cylinder will move these trucks and you can get decent mileage if you put forth a little thought about how you use the go pedal. I’m not preaching that you need to drive any certain way just stating my thoughts. I am guilty of burning through a gallon faster than I needed to! When I got my Borla ATAK...I wasted a few gallons listening to it....but even then my average never dropped below 14.

Posted

Also remember that when you're idling, you're getting 0 mpg.

 

It doesn't really seem to matter how I drive my car, I get 10 L/100 km in the city unless I'm idling a lot to warm it up in winter. Highway tends to vary depending on if I have the wife and dog with me or not because they come with a lot of stuff and demand that I run the A/C if it's warm. 

Posted

Something else to think about, you have 3 options when looking at your mpg's...last 25, 50, or 400 miles. Obviously last 25 miles and 50 miles are going to fluctuate the most. I'd set it to last 400 miles and go by that. You can also reset your trip odometer (have A and B) to see what it does lifetime for you. My A trip is my lifetime mileage and avg mpg, I use B trip for specific trips I take and it gets reset.

 

And nothing seems off by the numbers you posted. I see similar to you.

Posted
5 hours ago, midwestdenaliguy said:

Something else to think about, you have 3 options when looking at your mpg's...last 25, 50, or 400 miles. Obviously last 25 miles and 50 miles are going to fluctuate the most. I'd set it to last 400 miles and go by that. You can also reset your trip odometer (have A and B) to see what it does lifetime for you. My A trip is my lifetime mileage and avg mpg, I use B trip for specific trips I take and it gets reset.

 

And nothing seems off by the numbers you posted. I see similar to you.

I usually leave it on the 25 to see what the most recent is. I have trip A set for life time and then trip B I use for my oil change intervals. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...