Jump to content

GM plan larger engine than 6.6 engine gas


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 4/27/2019 at 6:44 PM, pathetic said:

As was said above ... Chevy has done nothing for a decade, the interiors still suck, they are still playing catch up to dodge even ..

I drove a 2019 (NBS) 1500 and felt the interiors had taken a step BACKWARDS in quality/fit/finish.  Will keep my 2015 HD.

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

How did a thread about the upcoming commercial gas V-8 degenerate into sniveling about interiors?  Honestly, I think the interiors of the new GM trucks look a little boring, but the fit, finish, and quality of the materials seems to me to be as good as Ram and better than Ford.    

Posted

Try operating a RAM Mega-screen with work gloves or winter driving gloves. A truck is a truck for heaven sake.

At least the GM interiors are familiar territory and work.

Sure things could be fancier but it comes with a price and a reliability factor.

 

 

Posted

Sounds like it is being developed for class 7 trucks only. Like deck trucks, roll off trucks, mechanical service trucks, and bread vans. This is not designed to compete with Ford's new 7.3L, but rather to compete with all the garbage diesel engines on the market that are plagued by diesel after-treatment system failures. Most modern diesel trucks with DEF can't go 2 months in Canadian winters without having some kind of issue. Whether the wiring harnesses burn themselves from the 1400 degree temps of the burner, injection nozzle failures, heated tank failures, frozen lines etc. Most of these diesel trucks can't even produce enough income to pay for their own payment, let alone insurance and repair bills. The manufactures know these systems suck, so they barely have a warranty on them, it only covers the components that don't fail, so we pay out of pocket on 2018 trucks. In fact companies like International offer an optional "Towing Package" where tow trucks are "free". Does that inspire confidence in your new $100,000 rig? 

 

This engine will allow Class 7 operators to go to work day in and day out without fear of being "De-Rated" on the side of the road and missing the next week of work. The increased fuel cost of running gas will easily pay itself off by not having the downtime and repair cost. 

Posted

You are absolutely right!  I work for a big fleet, and all the new diesels with SCR and DPF's are trouble.  Expensive trouble.  We are going to CNG, and they are much better.  Almost no repairs, much less routine maintenance.

 

That is what Ford's 7.3L seems to be designed for.  At least that's what Ford is emphasising, a gas engine for medium duty F series trucks.  I think GM's 8+L engine will likely be used in larger Internationals, bigger trucks than Ford's F-650 and 750.

 

Interesting that Ford will offer the 7.3L in F-250 and 350 pickups.  The 7.3L replaced the 6.8L V-10, and that engine has not been offered in pickups for 9 years.        

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The new 6.6L L8T gas motor is for 2500’s and 3500’s

 

It’s a stroked L86 with slightly lower compression. You HD guys should be thrilled. The L86 is incredible.

 

400hp and 460ft lbs. the l86 is 420hp and 460ftlbs.

 

The hp numbers don’t tell the whole story, the new hd gas truck will be A LOT faster than the old 6.0.

 

 

Posted

Ford might be roomier and have better bells and whistles in the HD line than GM, but out in farm country where people do tend to use pickup trucks more for what they were intended as opposed to just cars on steroids, GM rules the roost.  GM outsells Ford all the time in Iowa for instance.  So that should be somewhat of in indicator regarding how individuals who actually need pickup trucks to get stuff done feel about Ford vs GM. 

 

The 6.6 is not a stroked 6.2 L86.  The 6.2 is an all aluminum engine.  The 6.6 is an iron block.   They may share some characteristics and even some parts, but they are not the same motor that has just been stroked.

 

And indeed, the 6.6 should be faster than the 6.0.  But the real test will be its reliability.  And the 6.0 set a pretty high hurdle for that.  That is why I will keep my 6.0 2500 for quite a while and see what happens with the new motor(s) before I consider switching. The 6.6 L8T looks like a winner, but looks can be deceiving.  I am just cautiously optimistic.  

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Cowpie said:

Ford might be roomier and have better bells and whistles in the HD line than GM, but out in farm country where people do tend to use pickup trucks more for what they were intended as opposed to just cars on steroids, GM rules the roost.  GM outsells Ford all the time in Iowa for instance.  So that should be somewhat of in indicator regarding how individuals who actually need pickup trucks to get stuff done feel about Ford vs GM. 

 

The 6.6 is not a stroked 6.2.  The 6.2 is an all aluminum engine.  The 6.6 is an iron block.   They may share some characteristics and even some parts, but they are not the same motor that has just been stroked.

 

And indeed, the 6.6 should be faster than the 6.0.  But the real test will be its reliability.  And the 6.0 set a pretty high hurdle for that.

 

 

Yeah I didn’t mean “literally” a stroked 6.2L 

 

I meant “essentially”

 

The 6.2’s are pretty reliable. Ironblock + lower crompression = should he just as reliable as the 6.0.

 

Might get some carbon buildup at 100-150k miles though.

Posted

Will definitely call for catch can setup.  GDI engine are terrible for intake valve deposits from PCV contaminates entering the intake manifold.  At least with Port injection, there was some fuel dosing over the intake valves to keep this to a minimum.  I would have thought, especially with a engine designed for the HD market, that they would have used a GDI and PI combination as does some of the foreign makes in some engines.     But with GDI alone, it is going to be a test of reliability.   

Posted
37 minutes ago, Cowpie said:

Ford might be roomier and have better bells and whistles in the HD line than GM, but out in farm country where people do tend to use pickup trucks more for what they were intended as opposed to just cars on steroids, GM rules the roost.  GM outsells Ford all the time in Iowa for instance.  So that should be somewhat of in indicator regarding how individuals who actually need pickup trucks to get stuff done feel about Ford vs GM. 

 

The 6.6 is not a stroked 6.2 L86.  The 6.2 is an all aluminum engine.  The 6.6 is an iron block.   They may share some characteristics and even some parts, but they are not the same motor that has just been stroked.

 

And indeed, the 6.6 should be faster than the 6.0.  But the real test will be its reliability.  And the 6.0 set a pretty high hurdle for that.  That is why I will keep my 6.0 2500 for quite a while and see what happens with the new motor(s) before I consider switching. The 6.6 L8T looks like a winner, but looks can be deceiving.  I am just cautiously optimistic.  

 

 

A little to your southwest but still in what the Hollywood liberals call 'flyover country', there are definitely still pockets of Ford/GM fans, especially where there is only one dealer in the rural counties.  

 

But I'm amazed to see how much of the farm/ranch market share Dodge/Ram has taken over in 30 years.  And even more amazed to see the prices that old Dodge HD trucks with Cummins diesels bring at auction.  Old trucks with the hell beat out of them, not a straight or unscratched body panel left on them, but they seem to run like a top forever, are as tough as tanks underneath, and always bring top dollar.  

Posted

A recalibrated L8T set up to work with an Allison transmission (not sure which one) is rumored to be in the works for the Silverado 4500/5500/6500.  It may be introduced halfway through the 2020 MY.  Likely the 6.6L gas will also show up in the LCF 6500 and the Isuzu FTR as well.

 

Not much is known about the 8+L V-8, but speculation is that it is for an upcoming truck larger than the 6500.      

Posted
9 hours ago, MaverickZ71 said:

A little to your southwest but still in what the Hollywood liberals call 'flyover country', there are definitely still pockets of Ford/GM fans, especially where there is only one dealer in the rural counties.  

 

But I'm amazed to see how much of the farm/ranch market share Dodge/Ram has taken over in 30 years.  And even more amazed to see the prices that old Dodge HD trucks with Cummins diesels bring at auction.  Old trucks with the hell beat out of them, not a straight or unscratched body panel left on them, but they seem to run like a top forever, are as tough as tanks underneath, and always bring top dollar.  

Yep. If it has a Cummings in it, the seller asks for top dollar, even if the rest of the truck is falling apart, the pre emission Cummings is gold. Same said for 2004 - 2007.5 LLY & LZB Duramax. 

Posted

Currently,

2019  Silverado 4500HD, 5500HD and 6500HD

L5D    Engine, Duramax 6.6L Turbo-Diesel V8, B20-Diesel compatible, 350 hp @ 2700 rpm, 700 lb-ft torque @ 1600 rpm

 

So a de-tuned L5P is what is currently offered.

Transmissions  - there are at least 16 different transmission RPO codes available for it. All are Allisons. Some are ratio differences of same series Allison, but there are also a bunch of different Allison series listed)

 

Seems logical that the 6.6L gas,  detuned for heavier duty service will also get appropriately geared Allison transmissions.

Posted

Too bad the 6.6L Gas is stuck with the 6 speed ONLY. GM needs to offer the 10 speed as an option. 

 

Betting this will happen in a year or two. 

Posted
20 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

Yeah I didn’t mean “literally” a stroked 6.2L 

 

I meant “essentially”

 

The 6.2’s are pretty reliable. Ironblock + lower crompression = should he just as reliable as the 6.0.

 

Might get some carbon buildup at 100-150k miles though.

 

 

If I'm not mistaken, the new 6.6 gasser is a reworked 6.0, nothing to do with the half ton 6.2.....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,866
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Greg3160
    Newest Member
    Greg3160
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 870 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • After I wrote that reply I went for a ride. 85 F out. So trans started at 85 F and it shifted the same as it did an hour latter at 168 F. I've never actually recorded the to cold to shift point but it is under 32 F before they start hanging on to a lower gear or leaving the converter unlocked. Both intended to heat fluid.    Yes, brake or bake. Absolutely.      Your welcome. True research ended decades ago. Field trials are still in play.    There is a thing called oxidation onset temperature. This is the heat related oxidation not the O2 exposure kind. For mineral oil that starts at 140 F. So what happens after 140 F? Each 20 F cuts fluid life in half! Does using a Full Synthetic improve that? Yes! By how much? Depends on the base oil type and a few other factors. But enough to notice. Some esters are even higher. There are even synergies between types the will raise it higher than any one component is alone.    Then there is "Hindered" oils. Antioxidant additives. Hindered Polyol Esters can sit at 500 F for years in a turbine.   When a blender brags his oil will 'take 500 F" in service he doesn't specify for how long. Water will dance on a 500 F hot plate for several seconds. @newdude put up a chart showing the relationship between fluid temperature and it's life in an automatic transmission. Here's a version of that chart for Group III based oils. These temperatures are those in the pan as observed as 'normal'. that is you drive as you do for as long as you do under what load you ask of it and whatever that temperature is this graph applies to. Flash temperatures of a few minutes isn't what his means.    Note that fluids held at a constant 240 F have a service life of only 20K miles. 220 F explains the factory exchange limit, eh? My equipment I keep under 180 F and I'm good if the cooler will hold it as low as 140 F. But that's me.   
    • Im in the same boat. Carlink adapter comes tomorrow and dev account is in process. Would you he able to send the new instructions my way also? Question, do you have to change code and republish app everytime developer updates? Thanks for your assistance, truly the only thing i cant stand about my truck is the carplay limitation 
    • Parts department or service department at the dealer.
    • I’ll take the blue one!
    • And Google AI says......... Yes, your truck can technically handle it, but you will be right at or near its maximum limit. A 2016 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 High Country with a 6.5-foot bed has a maximum payload capacity of approximately 1,770 pounds.Weight RealitiesLoad weight: Half a cord of dry hardwood weighs roughly 1,100 to 1,500 pounds depending on the wood type (like oak or hickory).Payload limit: Payload includes the weight of the wood, you, any passengers, and a full tank of gas.The math: If you weigh 200 pounds and have a full tank of gas, a 1,500-pound load of wood puts you right at that 1,770-pound ceiling.Safety TipsCheck the yellow and white sticker on your driver-side door jamb for your truck's exact payload number, as high-end luxury trims with extra features have slightly lower capacities than basic trucks.Expect the rear end to sag noticeably.Drive carefully, avoid sudden turns or stops, and keep speeds low if you have to travel a distance.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...