Jump to content

GM plan larger engine than 6.6 engine gas


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 4/27/2019 at 6:44 PM, pathetic said:

As was said above ... Chevy has done nothing for a decade, the interiors still suck, they are still playing catch up to dodge even ..

I drove a 2019 (NBS) 1500 and felt the interiors had taken a step BACKWARDS in quality/fit/finish.  Will keep my 2015 HD.

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

How did a thread about the upcoming commercial gas V-8 degenerate into sniveling about interiors?  Honestly, I think the interiors of the new GM trucks look a little boring, but the fit, finish, and quality of the materials seems to me to be as good as Ram and better than Ford.    

Posted

Try operating a RAM Mega-screen with work gloves or winter driving gloves. A truck is a truck for heaven sake.

At least the GM interiors are familiar territory and work.

Sure things could be fancier but it comes with a price and a reliability factor.

 

 

Posted

Sounds like it is being developed for class 7 trucks only. Like deck trucks, roll off trucks, mechanical service trucks, and bread vans. This is not designed to compete with Ford's new 7.3L, but rather to compete with all the garbage diesel engines on the market that are plagued by diesel after-treatment system failures. Most modern diesel trucks with DEF can't go 2 months in Canadian winters without having some kind of issue. Whether the wiring harnesses burn themselves from the 1400 degree temps of the burner, injection nozzle failures, heated tank failures, frozen lines etc. Most of these diesel trucks can't even produce enough income to pay for their own payment, let alone insurance and repair bills. The manufactures know these systems suck, so they barely have a warranty on them, it only covers the components that don't fail, so we pay out of pocket on 2018 trucks. In fact companies like International offer an optional "Towing Package" where tow trucks are "free". Does that inspire confidence in your new $100,000 rig? 

 

This engine will allow Class 7 operators to go to work day in and day out without fear of being "De-Rated" on the side of the road and missing the next week of work. The increased fuel cost of running gas will easily pay itself off by not having the downtime and repair cost. 

Posted

You are absolutely right!  I work for a big fleet, and all the new diesels with SCR and DPF's are trouble.  Expensive trouble.  We are going to CNG, and they are much better.  Almost no repairs, much less routine maintenance.

 

That is what Ford's 7.3L seems to be designed for.  At least that's what Ford is emphasising, a gas engine for medium duty F series trucks.  I think GM's 8+L engine will likely be used in larger Internationals, bigger trucks than Ford's F-650 and 750.

 

Interesting that Ford will offer the 7.3L in F-250 and 350 pickups.  The 7.3L replaced the 6.8L V-10, and that engine has not been offered in pickups for 9 years.        

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The new 6.6L L8T gas motor is for 2500’s and 3500’s

 

It’s a stroked L86 with slightly lower compression. You HD guys should be thrilled. The L86 is incredible.

 

400hp and 460ft lbs. the l86 is 420hp and 460ftlbs.

 

The hp numbers don’t tell the whole story, the new hd gas truck will be A LOT faster than the old 6.0.

 

 

Posted

Ford might be roomier and have better bells and whistles in the HD line than GM, but out in farm country where people do tend to use pickup trucks more for what they were intended as opposed to just cars on steroids, GM rules the roost.  GM outsells Ford all the time in Iowa for instance.  So that should be somewhat of in indicator regarding how individuals who actually need pickup trucks to get stuff done feel about Ford vs GM. 

 

The 6.6 is not a stroked 6.2 L86.  The 6.2 is an all aluminum engine.  The 6.6 is an iron block.   They may share some characteristics and even some parts, but they are not the same motor that has just been stroked.

 

And indeed, the 6.6 should be faster than the 6.0.  But the real test will be its reliability.  And the 6.0 set a pretty high hurdle for that.  That is why I will keep my 6.0 2500 for quite a while and see what happens with the new motor(s) before I consider switching. The 6.6 L8T looks like a winner, but looks can be deceiving.  I am just cautiously optimistic.  

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Cowpie said:

Ford might be roomier and have better bells and whistles in the HD line than GM, but out in farm country where people do tend to use pickup trucks more for what they were intended as opposed to just cars on steroids, GM rules the roost.  GM outsells Ford all the time in Iowa for instance.  So that should be somewhat of in indicator regarding how individuals who actually need pickup trucks to get stuff done feel about Ford vs GM. 

 

The 6.6 is not a stroked 6.2.  The 6.2 is an all aluminum engine.  The 6.6 is an iron block.   They may share some characteristics and even some parts, but they are not the same motor that has just been stroked.

 

And indeed, the 6.6 should be faster than the 6.0.  But the real test will be its reliability.  And the 6.0 set a pretty high hurdle for that.

 

 

Yeah I didn’t mean “literally” a stroked 6.2L 

 

I meant “essentially”

 

The 6.2’s are pretty reliable. Ironblock + lower crompression = should he just as reliable as the 6.0.

 

Might get some carbon buildup at 100-150k miles though.

Posted

Will definitely call for catch can setup.  GDI engine are terrible for intake valve deposits from PCV contaminates entering the intake manifold.  At least with Port injection, there was some fuel dosing over the intake valves to keep this to a minimum.  I would have thought, especially with a engine designed for the HD market, that they would have used a GDI and PI combination as does some of the foreign makes in some engines.     But with GDI alone, it is going to be a test of reliability.   

Posted
37 minutes ago, Cowpie said:

Ford might be roomier and have better bells and whistles in the HD line than GM, but out in farm country where people do tend to use pickup trucks more for what they were intended as opposed to just cars on steroids, GM rules the roost.  GM outsells Ford all the time in Iowa for instance.  So that should be somewhat of in indicator regarding how individuals who actually need pickup trucks to get stuff done feel about Ford vs GM. 

 

The 6.6 is not a stroked 6.2 L86.  The 6.2 is an all aluminum engine.  The 6.6 is an iron block.   They may share some characteristics and even some parts, but they are not the same motor that has just been stroked.

 

And indeed, the 6.6 should be faster than the 6.0.  But the real test will be its reliability.  And the 6.0 set a pretty high hurdle for that.  That is why I will keep my 6.0 2500 for quite a while and see what happens with the new motor(s) before I consider switching. The 6.6 L8T looks like a winner, but looks can be deceiving.  I am just cautiously optimistic.  

 

 

A little to your southwest but still in what the Hollywood liberals call 'flyover country', there are definitely still pockets of Ford/GM fans, especially where there is only one dealer in the rural counties.  

 

But I'm amazed to see how much of the farm/ranch market share Dodge/Ram has taken over in 30 years.  And even more amazed to see the prices that old Dodge HD trucks with Cummins diesels bring at auction.  Old trucks with the hell beat out of them, not a straight or unscratched body panel left on them, but they seem to run like a top forever, are as tough as tanks underneath, and always bring top dollar.  

Posted

A recalibrated L8T set up to work with an Allison transmission (not sure which one) is rumored to be in the works for the Silverado 4500/5500/6500.  It may be introduced halfway through the 2020 MY.  Likely the 6.6L gas will also show up in the LCF 6500 and the Isuzu FTR as well.

 

Not much is known about the 8+L V-8, but speculation is that it is for an upcoming truck larger than the 6500.      

Posted
9 hours ago, MaverickZ71 said:

A little to your southwest but still in what the Hollywood liberals call 'flyover country', there are definitely still pockets of Ford/GM fans, especially where there is only one dealer in the rural counties.  

 

But I'm amazed to see how much of the farm/ranch market share Dodge/Ram has taken over in 30 years.  And even more amazed to see the prices that old Dodge HD trucks with Cummins diesels bring at auction.  Old trucks with the hell beat out of them, not a straight or unscratched body panel left on them, but they seem to run like a top forever, are as tough as tanks underneath, and always bring top dollar.  

Yep. If it has a Cummings in it, the seller asks for top dollar, even if the rest of the truck is falling apart, the pre emission Cummings is gold. Same said for 2004 - 2007.5 LLY & LZB Duramax. 

Posted

Currently,

2019  Silverado 4500HD, 5500HD and 6500HD

L5D    Engine, Duramax 6.6L Turbo-Diesel V8, B20-Diesel compatible, 350 hp @ 2700 rpm, 700 lb-ft torque @ 1600 rpm

 

So a de-tuned L5P is what is currently offered.

Transmissions  - there are at least 16 different transmission RPO codes available for it. All are Allisons. Some are ratio differences of same series Allison, but there are also a bunch of different Allison series listed)

 

Seems logical that the 6.6L gas,  detuned for heavier duty service will also get appropriately geared Allison transmissions.

Posted

Too bad the 6.6L Gas is stuck with the 6 speed ONLY. GM needs to offer the 10 speed as an option. 

 

Betting this will happen in a year or two. 

Posted
20 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

Yeah I didn’t mean “literally” a stroked 6.2L 

 

I meant “essentially”

 

The 6.2’s are pretty reliable. Ironblock + lower crompression = should he just as reliable as the 6.0.

 

Might get some carbon buildup at 100-150k miles though.

 

 

If I'm not mistaken, the new 6.6 gasser is a reworked 6.0, nothing to do with the half ton 6.2.....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My house is set at 75. My car at 70. When I have guests the house is at 70. 
    • OK you say you could hang meat but what was the actual temp? One of the AC systems job is to remove humidity that we feel on our body your new system removed alot of humidity as that is were the water comes from on the ac coils and that made it feel colder. 80 degrees with high humidity will feel hot vs 80 degrees with low humidity will feel alot cooler.
    • I was using recirc/max air. Especially if it really hot i start out by lowering the front windows a little with regular ac the go to recirculation after a few and rolling windows up. And it does not have the newest refrigerant. It has per the info under the hood r134. Not the new r1234yf.  
    • tldr; Shade tree mechanic stumped by variable displacement AC compressor.   Not Silverado related, but for my 2000 Camaro SS. I've never really used the AC since acquiring the car a good handful of years ago. I plan to take it on a trip this summer so I wanted to make sure the AC was in good shape. On an 73 degree day in the shop with the car idling I set the AC on "Max", temp set to cold, and fan on hi. The compressor turned on and air turned nice and cold.   I let it run for several minutes but noticed the compressor never cycled off. The engine was up to temperature enough that it began cycling the cooling fans on high. I had a set of manifold gauges hooked up and it was consistently at about 25 psi on the low side and between 200 and 225 psi (warm engine) on the high side. Per temperature charts, the low side is low (should be 30-35) and the high side is a little high (up to 170 per chart). I read the low pressure as potentially being under-charged underscored by a continually running compressor This was also underscored by temp readings of mid-20 degrees at the vents. Not just cold, freezing cold. Switching off the AC but leaving the HVAC fan on high produced a deluge of condensation underneath the vehicle. I was getting ice buildup on the evap core most likely.   The low reading (25psi) concerned me that the compressor wasn't switching off so I swapped out the pressure switch. No change in behavior, still ran constantly.   The AC clutch works fine as it engages/disengages with the HVAC switch on command. The compressor relay is good as I swapped it with two different known good relays just to be sure. Having eliminated that, and the pressure switch, I added refrigerant, thinking the constant run and low "low" pressure were signs of a slight undercharge. Makes sense, the car is 26 years old and it doesn't appear the AC system has ever been touched.   Adding some R134a didn't meaningfully change the low side pressure. And that's when a lightbulb flashed upstairs. While I consider the car "old", it's possibly "new" enough to have a variable displacement compressor. Did some reading and sure enough. Dangit. I don't work on these for this reason.   Adding refrigerant means the compressor will just compensate and won't really change pressures until it's severely overcharged or undercharged. But at least I wasn't getting ice/frost anymore, but instead high 30 degree temps out of the vents. That's more normal, but with variable displacement now I have no idea where my charge level is at. It's probably overcharged now. The high side even with the engine radiating serious heat was never really over about 225.   The static pressure at room temperature is dead on, before and after the charge. Both high/low equalize after some rest.   I'm thinking I'll need to take it to a shop. I want the proper charge level so I'm not working the compressor too hard. The only way to get an accurate charge is to evacuate and then re-charge with the exact amount specified for the system -- at least that's what I'm reading.   Anyone here with modern automotive AC knowledge?  
    • Mine is in the shop for the AC now. While it did get cold after a bit, it would take a while to even start to cool the air at all. Turns out the compressor was bad and cycling. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...