Jump to content

2014 GMC Sierra 5.3L issues


Recommended Posts

Posted

This may be more of a rant than anything.  

 

Back in 2016 I installed an Elite Engineering catch can on my 2014 GMC Sierra because all the rave and reviews were taking about how the oil mist on the dirty side of the PCV system would mess up the intake valves in the head.  I drank the Kool aid and here I am 2 1/2 years later with major problems.  

 

I'm not sure what failed on the catch can system, but something caused my rear main seal to blow out along with my oil cooler lines and the rear main seal housing plate seal.  When I contact Elite Engineering, they of course denied that their product could ever cause any issues of the sort despite many articles showing that in fact catch cans will cause shit like this to happen.  After many more articles and research, come to find out the experts have chimed in on this and have said unless I'm running a 9 second truck, there is no need or concern regarding the stock PCV system on the truck.  

 

I put my truck in a GMC service center for service on these items among others and they "fixed" the issue.  However, they failed to fix the rear main seal cover leaking.  Long story short and 4 weeks of my truck being in that shop, I'm still dripping oil in my drive way, I now have a starter solenoid harness clip thats broken and a truck that may or may not start depending on if that harness has unplugged itself.  

 

Starting in 2014, GM stopped putting a metal shim gasket on the rear main seal cover and are instructing their shops to use silicone on that.  Also, the oil pan is a two piece design meaning that the only way to seal the oil pan is by silicone as well.  Apparently, GM didn't learn their lessons from back in the day when they put 2 piece rear main seals in their motors and would blow those out at, you guessed it, where you silicone the seals together.  LMAO, man, maybe I should have bought a Ford.  Who knows...  

 

If there is anything to gain from my article, gain these things.

 

1.  Do NOT put any kind of catch can on your vehicle.  I was very meticulous with emptying the can and with taking care of my vehicle in general and here I am.

2.  Be careful who you take your truck to.  Hell, this was a very highly rated shop and I'm still having hell from these people. 

3.  Customer service is dead.  

 

Like I said, this is more of a rant.  I'm sure I'll catch some hate from this.  But, as I did, do your research and form your own opinions.  I just hope that my article helps 1 person at least.  

 

 

Posted
Sorry OP I gotta call BS on the catch can being the culprit. 
I'm thinking the same thing. Blown seals is a pressure issue. A catch can does not add pressure.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J727A using Tapatalk

Posted

But the catch can could cause a pressure build up if isn't functioning correctly.

Posted

I agree a catch can can't be the cause of blown seals.

I live in the mountains and have a catch can on my 2012.

Some of my trips cause our ears to plug up due to the elevation changes.

Now there is less atmospheric up here I believe.

One of my trips the elevation goes from 9200 feet to 5000 feet.

I would think these elevation changes would have more affect on pressures than flat landers.

 

:)

Posted

Does your catch can have a check valve that was installed backwards causing pressure issues?

I have the same can and no issues here.

Posted
1 hour ago, Gagliano7 said:

But the catch can could cause a pressure build up if isn't functioning correctly.

It’s a hollow can with an inlet and outlet. Not sure how it wouldn’t function properly. 

Posted

I think GM is saying that it was his catch can, so they don't have to pay for a new engine or rear main seal. Tell them you will appeal their decision in court. The only way that could happen is if you catch can somehow got plugged and that cant happen even if filled to the top with oil, the vacuum will just draw the liquid into the intake. 99% chance they are pulling the wool over your eyes. The only other thing I could think of is if the hoses feeding the can/intake were too short or had a kink in the vacuum line, that could create a "plugged" situation. 

Posted

Somebody posted on here a while back about liquid getting frozen in the catch can lines and blowing out their rear main seal.  Curious that we would have not heard about this before now.  And if GM is building such weak-assed seals, that shows how much we've regressed from the 1950s when the engines were basically sealed up (no pun intended) compared to now (no PCV system) and didn't blow all of the danged seals all the time.

Posted
This may be more of a rant than anything.  
 
Back in 2016 I installed an Elite Engineering catch can on my 2014 GMC Sierra because all the rave and reviews were taking about how the oil mist on the dirty side of the PCV system would mess up the intake valves in the head.  I drank the Kool aid and here I am 2 1/2 years later with major problems.  
 
I'm not sure what failed on the catch can system, but something caused my rear main seal to blow out along with my oil cooler lines and the rear main seal housing plate seal.  When I contact Elite Engineering, they of course denied that their product could ever cause any issues of the sort despite many articles showing that in fact catch cans will cause shit like this to happen.  After many more articles and research, come to find out the experts have chimed in on this and have said unless I'm running a 9 second truck, there is no need or concern regarding the stock PCV system on the truck.  
 
I put my truck in a GMC service center for service on these items among others and they "fixed" the issue.  However, they failed to fix the rear main seal cover leaking.  Long story short and 4 weeks of my truck being in that shop, I'm still dripping oil in my drive way, I now have a starter solenoid harness clip thats broken and a truck that may or may not start depending on if that harness has unplugged itself.  
 
Starting in 2014, GM stopped putting a metal shim gasket on the rear main seal cover and are instructing their shops to use silicone on that.  Also, the oil pan is a two piece design meaning that the only way to seal the oil pan is by silicone as well.  Apparently, GM didn't learn their lessons from back in the day when they put 2 piece rear main seals in their motors and would blow those out at, you guessed it, where you silicone the seals together.  LMAO, man, maybe I should have bought a Ford.  Who knows...  
 
If there is anything to gain from my article, gain these things.
 
1.  Do NOT put any kind of catch can on your vehicle.  I was very meticulous with emptying the can and with taking care of my vehicle in general and here I am.
2.  Be careful who you take your truck to.  Hell, this was a very highly rated shop and I'm still having hell from these people. 
3.  Customer service is dead.  
 
Like I said, this is more of a rant.  I'm sure I'll catch some hate from this.  But, as I did, do your research and form your own opinions.  I just hope that my article helps 1 person at least.  
 
 


Thank you very much for bringing this up and for your honesty, I too have been contemplating on having one installed on my 6.2. If it makes you feel any better, a couple months ago, while outside on the AutoZone parking lot looking under my hood I ran into an employee of AutoZone and he’s running a catch can too, raves about it and on a recent visit to stock up on detailing spray he warned me against using it cause his warranty was eradicated due to the damage the catch can “apparently” did to his truck. My truck only has 16k miles on it but I’ve sworn that if I ever have major issues that are caused by crappy engineering and can’t be fixed then I’d go out and purchase the newest twin turbo Raptor without having to lift or modify.

Good luck to you and definitely wish you better future experiences


Sent from above
Posted
1 hour ago, MaverickZ71 said:

Somebody posted on here a while back about liquid getting frozen in the catch can lines and blowing out their rear main seal.  Curious that we would have not heard about this before now.  And if GM is building such weak-assed seals, that shows how much we've regressed from the 1950s when the engines were basically sealed up (no pun intended) compared to now (no PCV system) and didn't blow all of the danged seals all the time.

Engines in the 50's were hardly "sealed up", back then they had a downdraft tube open to the atmosphere to vent crankcase gases. That all ended in the early 60's with the first anti-pollution device, the PCV. Those external PCV's located in a valve cover were pretty much foolproof compared to the internal PCV's of today's engines. For those of you to young to have ever seen a crankcase downdraft tube, watch a tractor pull sometime, at the end of a run you'll see those motors belching a copious amount of smoke through generally twin downdraft tubes.

Posted

I have had an elite engineering can installed since 23,000 miles and now have 55,000. No issues and I drain it once a month, which is probably too long, but sometimes I forget :). 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,677
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RobbertClaus
    Newest Member
    RobbertClaus
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 453 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No I didn’t watch a video of a person who analyzes oil for a living explain general oil usage. For clarity I did ask my brothers one who runs our equipment business. The other who runs our old ROW business about oil usage. Nothing has changed since I retired. Their personal vehicles or work vehicles use no oil. Not enough to see on the oil checking device. Then I pondered. I like to ponder. In this extended oil changing world with oil change countdowns or lights. If engines used say a qt every 2500 miles or up to even 4000 miles. With oil changes reaching as high as 15000 miles. Normal for most people is eight to ten. Vehicles should potentially be seizing up all over the place. Especially in hilly terrain. Just how many people actually check their oil? Maybe 10 percent. Those are the people that probably change their oil early. I like to research used car listings. I have five favorite dealers I check. They all list carfax with their listing. It’s rare to see vehicles with anything but extended oil changes. Transmission service, forget about it. I’ve seen Honda and Toyota certified vehicles up to 100K miles and ten years old. With nothing but normal maintenance. Isn’t nice we all have different experiences and believe our way is the best. You certainly get backup for whatever you believe. Life would be boring otherwise.
    • Interesting rumor. Dealers near me have been tight-lipped so far, but if this reveal actually happens next week, I'm really hoping they finally give the HD a proper interior overhaul. The competition has been eating their lunch in the cabin department for a while now.
    • There are a few good takeaways in that video that pertain to this thread, certainly the possibility of the oil control rings having buildup, the fuel injectors and how clean or not that they are ending up affecting the pistons rings carbon buildup, and the fact that its normal up to a point for a given engine to use some oil, and that the oil quality that is being utilized is part of that ring clogging up issue as well.   I was talking with a neighbor yesterday who has a baby LZ0 duramax and he had bought it slightly used but it does consume some oil and he has switched over to 5W-30 Euro spec oil and in this case that never made a difference in consumption over the factory 0W-20 recommendation. He finds it uses a quart in about 3500 miles and as he goes a ways over that distance he adds oil to full and goes another 1000 miles or so and then changes oil and is typically at 40% or so left on the oil monitor at that point with his use case of quite a lot of highway miles and more limited in short run use. I don't know what other LZ0 engines are doing for oil consumption but that is what his is doing. 
    • I dont care what Lake says. Goodnight. 
    • Ok well I guess Lake disagrees with me on a few points. I call oil consumption pretty basic. Rudimentary. He calls it "really complicated." I think 1qt consumed in 3k miles is a lot. He says that's normal. In 22 minutes, he'll use his natural talent to explain oil consumption to anyone watching this video. He covers everything from obvious engine damage to how normally functioning healthy engines consume oil by design. Lake explicitly states how you drive will impact oil consumption.   Shut up and watch:    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...