Jump to content

GREAT news! DFM disable coming soon


Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m losing hope that this will come. And I do hope that these engines won’t have lifter failures like the previous models 

  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
1 hour ago, Bmon007 said:

So newdude you're saying M9 will disable AFM/DFM but M10 is the same as D and does not disable AFM/DFM...

Yes. But who wants to essentially convert their trans to a 9 speed, and have to click the shift button 8 times before they take off every time? Seems like a major pain to avoid a mode that is almost imperceptible anyhow.

 

I would think after almost a year of trying, Range is probably going to give up on this pretty soon, if they haven’t already.

Posted

I've added a performance exhaust & air intake and the truck doesn't run/shift correctly. It seems I've got ahead of myself because there's currently no tune available for my truck. My exhaust guy told me if I could disable the DFM it would make a big improvement and it does. I don't want to run through this process before I take off every time but if that's what I have to do until I can get the truck tuned then I guess that's what I'll do.

 

Is there another option??

Posted
5 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

Yes. But who wants to essentially convert their trans to a 9 speed, and have to click the shift button 8 times before they take off every time? Seems like a major pain to avoid a mode that is almost imperceptible anyhow.

 

I would think after almost a year of trying, Range is probably going to give up on this pretty soon, if they haven’t already.

I've added a performance exhaust & air intake and the truck doesn't run/shift correctly. It seems I've got ahead of myself because there's currently no tune available for my truck. My exhaust guy told me if I could disable the DFM it would make a big improvement and it does. I don't want to run through this process before I take off every time but if that's what I have to do until I can get the truck tuned then I guess that's what I'll do.

 

Is there another option??

Posted
On 7/23/2019 at 6:56 PM, Marv’s Trailboss 19 said:

Why would you want to disable this?? 

When I had a Ram with MDS (same spiel as AFM) people who loved to mod their exhaust would complain about the drone of the engine in V4 mode, so they would disable MDS. On my 2011, Tow/Haul mode would deactivate MDS, some people just drove in Tow/Haul mode all the time. For some folks the sound and vibration of V4 mode just bothers them, which I can understand.

 

DFM is still very new. I haven't read about any wide spread durability issues with keeping AFM activated, but I've often wondered about the long-term effects of deactivating the same cylinders every time. Would that cause different wear patterns in the valve train between cylinders? I've followed several rebuild threads and have seen evidence that it could have some effect on very high-mileage engines. They still ran fine, but the wear level was noticeable and measurable. But as far as affecting performance over the average lifespan of an engine, probably not.

 

I would think that DFM would not be an issue at all in that regard, since it cycles between cylinders, it's not the same cylinders every time. Seems like a vastly superior system overall, IMHO. However, the sound of the engine might still be affected, which may bother some people. I haven't driven a truck with DFM yet so I have no opinion of the sound one way or the other.

 

One other reason, with which I tend to agree, is anything that adds a level of complexity to a system increases the probability of issues down the road. Simplicity is king when it comes to reliability and serviceability.

Posted
10 hours ago, Bmon007 said:

I've added a performance exhaust & air intake and the truck doesn't run/shift correctly. It seems I've got ahead of myself because there's currently no tune available for my truck. My exhaust guy told me if I could disable the DFM it would make a big improvement and it does. I don't want to run through this process before I take off every time but if that's what I have to do until I can get the truck tuned then I guess that's what I'll do.

 

Is there another option??

What intake do you have? I’m on the stock one, but I do have the GM performance exhaust installed. I really don’t notice DFM anymore now than before. I wouldn’t hold your breath on a tune unfortunately.

Posted
9 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

What intake do you have? I’m on the stock one, but I do have the GM performance exhaust installed. I really don’t notice DFM anymore now than before. I wouldn’t hold your breath on a tune unfortunately.

I added an AFE Vulcan Series SS exhaust and a K&N Air Charger intake. It sounds mean... I could definitly feel it having issues when the DFM dropped cylinders. Puting it in manual shift mode disables the DFM and it runs great. I just just don't want to play that game long term...

 

530100820_AFEVulcanSeriesExhaust.JPG.a024bdc346676fee0ce47eb8634210cd.JPG

 

1482735936_KNAirIntake.thumb.jpg.ce251fe45c87a3bf2b1dfdad1f8a7ff2.jpg

 

  • 3 months later...
Posted
12 hours ago, Mr. RST said:

Any updates on the release of the dfm disable for the 19+ trucks? 

Welcome to this forum.  You will find a diverse range of opinions here for you to consider.  Whenever I read about disabling AFM or DFM it reminds me of my next door neighbour showing me his brand new 1975 automobile the day he drove it home.  The next day he proudly called me over to show me his modification.  My neighbour had cut off the shoulder strap portion of his seat belts in his new car because this new safety crap was stupid and uncomfortable.   I am not suggesting that AFM or DFM are safety features but they are mechanical improvements to your car. You will have no trouble finding negative press on mechanical improvements or changes.  Those improvements associated with safety or environmental improvement are particularly vulnerable to attack.  I know you didn't ask for my opinion, but I'm suggesting that a response of "Neveruary 32" is not all bad!

Posted
1 hour ago, Donstar said:

Welcome to this forum.  You will find a diverse range of opinions here for you to consider.  Whenever I read about disabling AFM or DFM it reminds me of my next door neighbour showing me his brand new 1975 automobile the day he drove it home.  The next day he proudly called me over to show me his modification.  My neighbour had cut off the shoulder strap portion of his seat belts in his new car because this new safety crap was stupid and uncomfortable.   I am not suggesting that AFM or DFM are safety features but they are mechanical improvements to your car. You will have no trouble finding negative press on mechanical improvements or changes.  Those improvements associated with safety or environmental improvement are particularly vulnerable to attack.  I know you didn't ask for my opinion, but I'm suggesting that a response of "Neveruary 32" is not all bad!

I understand it’s to save fuel and such just not a fan of the shudder or helicopter sound you get with an aftermarket exhaust. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Mr. RST said:

I understand it’s to save fuel and such just not a fan of the shudder or helicopter sound you get with an aftermarket exhaust. 

?????

Nope, I don't have any such sound, and I'm running Borla S-type catback exhaust.

Posted

Good to know! Thanks, also just got off the phone with range and they said by new year it should be released but who knows from what I’m hearing 

Posted

In case anyone is interested, I emailed range (again for like the 5th time since April) and rather than getting a generic we're working on it and don't know when it'll be done answer I got this.  Cautiously optimistic.  Would be awesome to have it by end of year.

 

And before everyone jumps in to ask why I want it or what the big deal is or they can't fell or tell when it kicks in, I have Corsa exhaust on my 6.2 and you can DEFINITELY tell when it's in DFM.  Sounds like crap.

 

Screenshot_20191202-174431_Yahoo Mail.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...