Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2/14/2020 at 12:05 PM, Flatblack83 said:

 

What wheel n tire did u choose..? The wheels look good, its hard to tell tho on the tires and the size.

35” bfg all terrain 18” Kmc XD wheels 

Posted

I've been lurking on this thread as well as others and am considering Bilstein 5100s to level the front of my 2019 HC 6.2 and a 1" block to keep a small rake for towing. Has anyone that's installed a front level or a rear block noticed a vibration front or rear after install? Other threads discuss vibrations after installations of blocks, perhaps because pinion angles have changed. Would a 2" front level create a need for different UCAs or axles? What's the difference between standard front axles and AT4 front axles?

Posted

Something to remember when you lifting the front of the truck to level it,  the chassis and jacking points are raised.  As such you may have a problem using your standard jack to lift the front tire off the ground.  The AT4 and Trailboss have different jacks to take this extra ride height into account.

 

I have done two things to help remedy this.  I have made a wooden jack base that I place the jack on when lifting the front.  I also have a block of wood that I put in between the UCA and the bump stop (sits on the back side of the shock turret) to limit the amount of downward wheel travel.  Both work well and cheap and easy to do.

Posted
11 hours ago, Fast325it said:

I've been lurking on this thread as well as others and am considering Bilstein 5100s to level the front of my 2019 HC 6.2 and a 1" block to keep a small rake for towing. Has anyone that's installed a front level or a rear block noticed a vibration front or rear after install? Other threads discuss vibrations after installations of blocks, perhaps because pinion angles have changed. Would a 2" front level create a need for different UCAs or axles? What's the difference between standard front axles and AT4 front axles?

If your High Country does not have magnaride  then the 5100 swap and ride height adjustment should be straight forward.   I have just completed a 2 inch lift on my 2019 Elevation using the AT4 5100's with the fronts at +0.55 inches above stock AT4 height. I used the Readylift 2.25 blocks in the back and removed the wedge/shim that was installed from the factory.  I also installed the tapered lift block with the wide side at the front (contrary to what Readylift said) as I found that this got the pinion angle close to the angle of the drive train.  No vibrations. If you are going to go up to two inches on the front you should be ok with the CV axles as long as you do not hang them out to the max when off roading etc.  The AT4 CV axles are a bit longer to cater for more droop.  Your upper control arms will be fine as the they are the same on the lower Elevation type models and the AT4/Trailboss models, as long as you do not go too far past the 2 inch lift.  I have attached the  installation for the 5100 front shocks for the non lifted GM trucks as well as the installation for the AT4/Trailboss.  If you plan on lifting the front 2inches with the 5100 then rather go for the AT4 shocks and keep standard height.  If I recall correctly the standard 5100 rear shocks for Elevation etc. could be used when the back is raised 1 inch.  i.e. you could use the AT4 front shocks and the Elevation back shocks.

Bilstein shocks for AT4.pdf Bilstein shocks for elevation.pdf

Posted
10 hours ago, MRP said:

The AT4 and Trailboss have different jacks to take this extra ride height into account.

Nope.  The jacks are exactly the same, with the same part number as the standard trucks' jacks, and the same extension.  I checked against the one that came in my truck vs. a buddie's AT4 jack vs. the one that came in my lift kit.  All identical.

Posted
9 hours ago, MRP said:

I used the Readylift 2.25 blocks in the back and removed the wedge/shim that was installed from the factory.  I also installed the tapered lift block with the wide side at the front (contrary to what Readylift said) as I found that this got the pinion angle close to the angle of the drive train.

Why?  Did you put a gauge on it or did you just eyeball it?  You've increased the pinion angle over stock by doing this.  What is the angle at the tailshaft vs. at the diff?  There is a reason lift blocks are tapered....it is to correct the pinion angle for the increased lift AND keep the driveshaft in the transmission.  

Posted
9 hours ago, lapoolboy said:

Nope.  The jacks are exactly the same, with the same part number as the standard trucks' jacks, and the same extension.  I checked against the one that came in my truck vs. a buddie's AT4 jack vs. the one that came in my lift kit.  All identical.

That is interesting and contrary to what I was told by my lock GM dealer when I was investigating lifting my truck.  When I looked at the GM 2 inch lift kit, and asked why it included a new jack, I was told that it was to cater for the extra lift on the front and that is why the AT 4 and Elevation had different jacks.  Either way, I did not end up going with the GM kit, primarily because I did not want another set of Rancho shocks on my truck.   Hence just going the wooden block route mentioned in my previous article.  If it turns out that I do not need the blocks, it's still a win as I do not have to turn the jack out so far to make contact.

Posted
9 hours ago, lapoolboy said:

Why?  Did you put a gauge on it or did you just eyeball it?  You've increased the pinion angle over stock by doing this.  What is the angle at the tailshaft vs. at the diff?  There is a reason lift blocks are tapered....it is to correct the pinion angle for the increased lift AND keep the driveshaft in the transmission.  

It would be impossible to just eyeball those angles.  I used a gauge and put it on the front crank pulley and on the heads of the bolts for the auto box pan, just to get two engine/drive train angle readings.  I then put it on the face of the pinion flange.  What made it work out is that I took out the wedges that were in from  the factory before I put in the  lift blocks.  The taper on the factory wedges is about double that of the lift blocks.  When I spoke to Readylift, they said to leave the factory wedge in and then install the lift blocks with the narrow side to the front.  I did not want to leave the wedges in as they are shorter than the length of the lift blocks.  I now have full contact between the blades and lift blocks.  The nett effect in terms of change in pinion angle would be the same as the one offsets the other.

Posted
2 hours ago, MRP said:

It would be impossible to just eyeball those angles.  I used a gauge and put it on the front crank pulley and on the heads of the bolts for the auto box pan, just to get two engine/drive train angle readings.  I then put it on the face of the pinion flange.  What made it work out is that I took out the wedges that were in from  the factory before I put in the  lift blocks.  The taper on the factory wedges is about double that of the lift blocks.  When I spoke to Readylift, they said to leave the factory wedge in and then install the lift blocks with the narrow side to the front.  I did not want to leave the wedges in as they are shorter than the length of the lift blocks.  I now have full contact between the blades and lift blocks.  The nett effect in terms of change in pinion angle would be the same as the one offsets the other.

What are your MEASURED angles now, specifically?

Posted
38 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

What are your MEASURED angles now, specifically?

2 degrees off vertical

Posted
On 8/16/2019 at 8:24 PM, rmkmb said:

2” front level ,1” rear block

285/60/20 Toyo’s

 

 

A19DB056-B7BF-4B70-B094-4091DAAC66DD.jpeg

Your truck looks great!

Do you know what the Rake ended up being?

Posted

I just picked up a '21 RST 2WD and want to do a level kit on it. Which one should I go with? Upper or Lower Mount? 

Posted
5 hours ago, SSCHUU said:

I just picked up a '21 RST 2WD and want to do a level kit on it. Which one should I go with? Upper or Lower Mount? 

On a 2wd it's not as critical since there is no front axle shaft that could potentially hit/rub on a bottom mount if you go with 2"+ lift blocks. You could go with either or both depending on how high you go. More than 3" I believe (someone who's done it correct me if I'm wrong) you will want to consider getting new upper control arms.

Bottom mounts are a little easier to install since you don't have to remove the struts. You should still get the alignment checked regardless of which type of level you use as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have A 2020 1500 5.3 8 speed. LTZ. Transmission problems since 60,000 miles. Started when I go to store in morning to get my morning coffee before work leave truck running get back in put it in drive/ rev no movement step on gas a little slams into gear. Put in neutral step on gas little shake then put in gear and gose.  Shut truck off start .. ok now at stop light stop truck after a few seconds feel a little kick if that doesn’t happen stuck in 3/4 gear shut truck off wait few seconds and start usually ok again. If you down shift manually ok as long as you get into 1st before stop. If not it kicks . I WANT A NEW TRANSMISSION. Now I want a new truck it just hit 80,000 IDK IF ILL BUY CHEVY CAUSE THEY STILL HAVE THE PROBLEM AND REFUSE TO RECALL . Oh I’ve changed the fluid and filter 3 times now. And yes used mobile 1 not ac/delco cause it’s not meeting the requirements that mobile is did use ac/delco filter 
    • Of course refrain from political debate but I myself have very dismal hope for what is all going on up here every where we turn so I nodded my head when I saw this joke.     
    • I'm looking at carpal tunnel surgery on my left hand and lumbar fusion. 
    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...