Jump to content

Why would you buy a V8?


Donstar

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't think it's going to only take 5-10 years for replaceable batteries. Plus the problem of everyone having proprietary tech will hinder the gas station scenario significantly. One day battery tech will catch up and electric will be a very real alternative. I know graphine batteries or whatever they're called looks quite promising. Last I checked up on it it was a long way away from the consumer market. As are the other alternatives I haven't heard about or haven't even been publicized yet. My guess is to watch cell phone batteries for an indication of when we'll see better results in the automotive realm.

 

I'm also waiting for solar to improve as well. Living in the sunshine state you'd think we'd all have solar here, I see more panels in my travels out of state than in it.

 

I'm not against technology as a whole, I'm just waiting for certain tech to be a good option for me. As with everything else I don't want something forced upon me or shoved down my throat saying it's for my own good.

 

 

*edit*

My reference to hills had nothing to do with energy regen, just a poor joke about Florida not having hills. As far as I know my lmm can maintain speed with 8k behind it. I'd certainly hope so seeing as how our old 6.0s could. Granted the Appalachians aren't the rockies but they still made it.

 

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
4 hours ago, CamGTP said:

What's the temperature suppose to be?

 

If you can answer that, then I'll buy into climate change.

 Depends on who you ask and what axe they are grinding. Say that three times fast. ?

 

Here's what I do know. I don't know noth' n.  

Posted
11 hours ago, Chevyguy85 said:

I'm not against technology as a whole, I'm just waiting for certain tech to be a good option for me. As with everything else I don't want something forced upon me or shoved down my throat saying it's for my own good.

Very well said!  I think we all may have EV's thrust upon us very soon and worth being prepared.  Our provincial government (for example) has stated that their target is to longer allow the sale of new fossil fuel burning vehicles by 2030.  (I hope to be alive then and still driving!)  This date may or may not be realistic but I don't want to be holding on to an expensive used V8 pickup when such a date approaches.  The time is reasonable for me to be looking seriously at EV's.  I would like nothing more than to believe climate change is propaganda and technology will continue to refine the gas engine c/w lower fuel costs.  However, most of us have suffered or had a close relative suffer, from an abnormal weather event over the past few years. Thanks to the internet, there is so much information available and no reason to be caught by surprise.  https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/  This morning I was watching video clips on a prototype electric F150. I anticipate GM and Ford will have a response to the launch of the Rivian and possibly Tesla trucks within the next couple of years.

Posted

In the land of the free, it doesn’t make sense to force anything on us. In my family I could see an electric car as one of our rides for local use. It has to satisfy a few requirements. At least 200 mile range. Reasonable price, economic to use, fun to drive, comfortable. Not there yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
10 minutes ago, mookdoc6 said:

GM is dropping a 400Mile Escalade in 2022?  Not bad for range..hey!

This is the type of vehicle I am hoping to be a realistic choice for my next (or the one after) purchase.  Here is a list of upcoming EV's: https://www.autonews.com/article/20181001/OEM04/181009990/nearly-100-electrified-models-slated-to-arrive-through-2022

Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

In the land of the free, it doesn’t make sense to force anything on us. In my family I could see an electric car as one of our rides for local use. It has to satisfy a few requirements. At least 200 mile range. Reasonable price, economic to use, fun to drive, comfortable. Not there yet.
 

I agree.  The only way this will be thrust upon us is if we're not paying attention or choose to ignore.   Have you tried the Nissan Leaf?  We have enjoyed renting Nissan products on our regular visits to the Houston area.  On paper, the Leaf looks promising and may do well as a replacement for my wife's aging Yaris!

Posted
I agree.  The only way this will be thrust upon us is if we're not paying attention or choose to ignore.   Have you tried the Nissan Leaf?  We have enjoyed renting Nissan products on our regular visits to the Houston area.  On paper, the Leaf looks promising and may do well as a replacement for my wife's aging Yaris!

I’ll give it a look


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

If you're just using your truck to drive around down with one or two people in it, then we can have this discussion. I take 5 adults, a 2000lb boat and all our gear 600 miles round trip most weekends. Until there is an alternative to my 5.3 that will do that and go 200,000 miles and 10 years with little more than regular tires/brakes/oil changes, I'm sticking with a good old naturally aspirated V8. 

 

Just to be fair, I also have a small 4cyl car in  the garage that does our round-town work during the week. Just sayin, V8 trucks are going to be around for a long time. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Donstar said:

This is the type of vehicle I am hoping to be a realistic choice for my next (or the one after) purchase.  Here is a list of upcoming EV's: https://www.autonews.com/article/20181001/OEM04/181009990/nearly-100-electrified-models-slated-to-arrive-through-2022

"Musk has said the pickup would seat as many as six people, have up to 500 miles of range, tow up to 300,000 pounds..." I think they confused the stats for the tractor with the pickup

 

3 hours ago, Zoomie said:

If you're just using your truck to drive around down with one or two people in it, then we can have this discussion. I take 5 adults, a 2000lb boat and all our gear 600 miles round trip most weekends. Until there is an alternative to my 5.3 that will do that and go 200,000 miles and 10 years with little more than regular tires/brakes/oil changes, I'm sticking with a good old naturally aspirated V8. 

 

Just to be fair, I also have a small 4cyl car in  the garage that does our round-town work during the week. Just sayin, V8 trucks are going to be around for a long time. 

I use my pickup mainly to drive around town and it's just me.  I'm not going to get a second vehicle, electric or otherwise, for town driving and have my pickup to use when I go on road trips or want to tow something it's not worth it, nor is it financially sound for me to do so.  I don't even likes cars anyway :)

Posted

The V8 will die out as soon as men's egos do... I will buy the biggest v8 and most oversized truck I can afford and fit in my garage.. I drive a 5.3 because I couldn't afford a 6.2, I drive a 1500 because I couldn't afford a 2500.. I will be very surprised if an electric car ever surpasses the internal combustion engine... It would not fit my life style unless it had at least 1-2k miles between charges and charged fully i 30 minutes or less..

Posted

 

25 minutes ago, Imcrazy said:

The V8 will die out as soon as men's egos do... I will buy the biggest v8 and most oversized truck I can afford and fit in my garage.. I drive a 5.3 because I couldn't afford a 6.2, I drive a 1500 because I couldn't afford a 2500.. I will be very surprised if an electric car ever surpasses the internal combustion engine... It would not fit my life style unless it had at least 1-2k miles between charges and charged fully i 30 minutes or less..

I don't think egos will need to die but the terminology will change.  There will still be the needs/wants discussions over power and performance.  Language describing available power options will sound like,  "The base model has 402 horsepower (300 kilowatts), 413 pound-feet 560 Newton-meters), and a 105 kWh battery capacity offering a driving range over 230 miles (370 kilometers). The middle step has 754 hp (562 kW), 826 lb-ft (1,120 Nm), and a 135 kWh battery with a range over 300 miles (483 kilometers). The range-topping version has slightly less power at 700 hp (522 kW) and 826 lb-ft (1,120 Nm), but it packs a 180 kWh battery with a range over 400 miles (644 kilometers)".   "Filling up" will be different with both negatives and positives. (no pun intended!)  The ability to top off the tank at home will prove convenient but the days you wish to travel long distances away from home will have some initial challenges.  Currently (I did it again!) our local malls and public venues have dedicated parking and rapid chargers for EV's.  I suspect you will see parking spaces equipped like this become much more widespread, allowing you to keep your vehicle "topped up", while at work, shopping or other activities away from home.  My cell phone comes to mind....

Posted
On 7/29/2019 at 2:09 PM, Donstar said:

 climate change is real.  

I thought religious talk was frowned upon here?  

 

The climate changes every day, it rains here and not there, the sun rises every day in the east and sets in the west.  The wind blows over there, then here, then somewhere else.  Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant.  

 

The first thing one learns about Communism is that it is built upon lie after lie and has no basis in reality, it's evil.

 

Long live the Small Block Chevy V8!

 

What is the usefulness of an electric vehicle after a hurricane knocks out the power for a few days, week(s) or a month?  Zip, zero, nada.  NO THANKS!  

Posted

Recharging is a main barrier. That requires an infallible power grid (it is NOT at this time) and the battery needs to be rechargeable in a time frame similar to filling the tank with gas.

I live in Central Florida. We get hurricanes. The power goes out.

Guess what we do?

We stock 80 gallons of gas in 5 gallon jugs to feed the generator and chain saws to get back up again.

Fossil fuel isn't going anywhere for a looooong time.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J727A using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 394 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...