Jump to content

e85 Ethanol Mixing (anyone doing it?)


Recommended Posts

Posted

For those that do NOT have an e85 Flex Fuel truck (which for 2019 line-up is almost 90% of us unfortunately, except for the WT Fleet Silverados)

 

Just curious is anybody mixing e85 with their 93 Octane pump gas?  If so, how much, how far have you taken it?  I think most of our trucks have the 24 Gallon tanks.   (4 gallons e85  w 20 gasoline or?? )

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
24 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

Yes, I'm doing it.  Basically going as much as a 50/50 mix.  No issues. 

Awesome, I suspected as much.  I've been doing  6 gallons e85 and 18 gallons gasoline, for a roughly e30 blend.  Truck hasn't skipped a beat, no issues for last 1000 miles and been doing it since my first tank.


Was thinking about taking it up a notch to 50-50 mix (12 gallons each) which would be an e48 blend.  Eventually when the commercial market comes up with a Sensor & Tune, going to run the full e85.    I do have the JET Stage II Module installed now, which advances the timing.  

 

I use the Wallace Racing calculator http://www.wallaceracing.com/ethanol-mix-calc.php

 

 

Posted
Just a curious  why you want to run e85
I think it's cheaper most places.

It's about 30 cents less here in Central Florida.

But you lose a bit of fuel mileage with it, so it's probably a wash in terms of saving money.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J727A using Tapatalk

Posted

Fair enough. Because unless your truck is programmed to accept e85 I don't think you get the performance gain. It might be worst. I guess you can argue it will clean up the engine

Posted
Fair enough. Because unless your truck is programmed to accept e85 I don't think you get the performance gain. It might be worst. I guess you can argue it will clean up the engine
Personally, I wouldn't run E85 in a truck not set up for it. I had a 2014 5.3 E85 and now a 2017 5.3 E85, and both had noticeable gains in power.

The only difference on the K2 pickups between an E85 and non-E85 was (I believe) a sensor to detect ethanol level, which adjusts ignition timing and fuel injector pulse duration.

People here have made the conversion and it's plug and play, your ECM is already capable of reading the input from that sensor.

Since E85 and fuels higher in ethanol content than E10/E15 (regular gas) require a timing adjustment, I would not use it unless the truck was set up for it. Incorrect timing is bad for your spark plugs (fouling) and bad for your valves.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J727A using Tapatalk

Posted

Seems pointless to run anything more than E10-15 in a non flex fuel vehicle. The factory stoich settings have been 14.1-14.2 for a few years now to go with mostly standard E10 fuel ratings. (E0 fuel in 14.68)

 

Running a greater alcohol content shouldn't be doing anymore for the engine when it doesn't know that. If you were computer savvy and knew what parameters to watch on a nice live data scanner you'd likely notice the computer doing more work to try and bring the fueling back closer to the stoich value already set from the factory. That's just the tip of it, it also can't properly adjust fuel flow through the injectors for the extra fuel required at full throttle for the greater alcohol content.

Posted
Seems pointless to run anything more than E10-15 in a non flex fuel vehicle. The factory stoich settings have been 14.1-14.2 for a few years now to go with mostly standard E10 fuel ratings. (E0 fuel in 14.68)
 
Running a greater alcohol content shouldn't be doing anymore for the engine when it doesn't know that. If you were computer savvy and knew what parameters to watch on a nice live data scanner you'd likely notice the computer doing more work to try and bring the fueling back closer to the stoich value already set from the factory. That's just the tip of it, it also can't properly adjust fuel flow through the injectors for the extra fuel required at full throttle for the greater alcohol content.
Exactly. The timing won't be optimized and neither will the injector pulse. The E85 capable trucks have a sensor that detects the ethanol and adjusts those two parameters accordingly.

It will not run better with added ethanol without this, in fact it might work worse. Ethanol has less energy per volume than gasoline does.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J727A using Tapatalk

Posted

To me it burns cleaner and since around here it is a dollar cheaper per gallon than premium it cost the same to use gallon per mile wise. 

Posted
To me it burns cleaner and since around here it is a dollar cheaper per gallon than premium it cost the same to use gallon per mile wise. 


I wonder if just a couple gallons worth per tank would actually benefit any just for cleaning purposes?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I believe the mixing of fuel is a good idea. 

It would keep the motor cleaner.

Around here it is not readily available or I would run it mixed and not mixed.

:)

Posted
I believe the mixing of fuel is a good idea. 
It would keep the motor cleaner.
Around here it is not readily available or I would run it mixed and not mixed.
[emoji4]


Have you ever mixed the fuels on your non E85 compatible 5.3 or 6.2?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I hate they took the capability away to run E-85. I always run E-85 in my 6.2 because not only is it a better fuel it's grown by a local farmer and I would rather support them then an oil company. I get about 10 mpg on e85 in town and got about 12 mpg on premium. Here premium is well over $1 more than e85

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted

I’m going to add a few gallons into mine just for the sake of cleaning, hopefully I don’t have to take the 91 tune off


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Certainly as the new model year comes along and that may mean a new refreshed model such as for example the upcoming 2027 half tons and lets just say for arguments sake that current year trucks are in decent supply on the new lot and its not guaranteed but some years and depending on the current economic state that buyers may turn their nose up at the so called old stock/old model and want the "new new" shiny object. When those stars align and in this case GM corporate puts out a great discount on what is becoming the old stock as well as dealers willing to deal to get that inventory off the lot, that's when it would be easier to deal as long as, as it was pointed out that your willing to take what is there for choice of inventory in an area that makes sense to you shopping wise. What you don't get deals on or typically so is the incoming new toy in the showroom, that is where if they don't have much inventory of the new model year and customers that are willing to pay to beat the Joneses and will pay top dollar for it just because. Also sometimes there is that vehicle that few are interested in for whatever reason in how its equipped that becomes two years old and they really want to get rid of that vehicle. New in all cases and warranty the same typically although plan on changing that battery out on the older used one, lot rot of batteries with todays vehicles that draw power constantly.    I too was just too leery about buying a newer used truck as I know how all too many seem to treat their vehicle maintenance wise and up here in Canada there wasn't the used market to choose from like one would assume because of all the bull crap going on with under a year old trucks and under certain mileage being bought up by USA brokers and being hauled/driven south to be sold in the sates so the used price was too demanding here. Also a certain insurance coverage I wanted was only available on a new truck at time of purchase and not even a so called new demo on a lot could have that no depreciation loss coverage. I made the best deal I could on a truck I personally chose for options on an order so they knew it was most likely sold before it ever hit their lot so no lot interest charges for the dealer to swallow. I also wanted a new vehicle so that I could plaster the crap out of it underneath with fluid film and see if that will help slow down the rust issues we have here due to the crap they spread on the winter roads. 
    • Sure...but there is no "update" to be had.  GM has not issued any support for this.  
    • You mean it's not supported yet in the trucks. The hardware is certainly there. The software just needs updated.
    • Is the carbon pro bed still a thing? I figured it was one of those things that quietly disappeared from low take rate.   I thought Chevrolet tried adding it too...   Minimal.   Despite all the 'all new' versions since GMT-800, lots of parts still swap from generation to generation.   I've seen a bunch of GMT-800s with a K2 rear bumper on them. 
    • We still haven't seen the GMC's. I expect the Chevys to more orr less match the Fords, but with no all aluminum body and simple SBC, be significantly more affordable. I'm hoping GMC offers the 6.7 engine and lays it all out on the line. My main question? More premium GMC's already use composite leads out back. Does Chevy get any? What other frame/suspension changes?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...