Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, mikeyk101 said:

Not sure why yours wouldnt be included in the recall. As far as replacement of the brake booster, it was supposed to be for all 2015-2018 Silverados and Sierras at no charge as far as I was aware. It is Special Coverage N182202780 and is covered under this special warranty for 10 years/ 150,000 miles. 

 

Interesting, thanks. I did put in my VIN in their recall and it said no recalls were found on my truck.  I'll consult with my local dealer.

Posted
9 hours ago, Robopie said:

 

Interesting, thanks. I did put in my VIN in their recall and it said no recalls were found on my truck.  I'll consult with my local dealer.

Did you buy the truck used? If so, the previous owner took care of the initial recall. That would be why there are no recalls listed. As far as the recall, it was just flashing the software to update the pump operation with the false hope that this would solve the problem. In my case, the problem actually happened after the software flash. The Specual Coverage isn't a recall per se but is offering extended coverage to that component in case of a failure. The dealership won't do any fixes unless there is a problem. But if the problem happens, you should be GTG.

Posted
21 hours ago, Robopie said:

 

Interesting, thanks. I did put in my VIN in their recall and it said no recalls were found on my truck.  I'll consult with my local dealer.

 

There were two recalls. The original was to replace the pump with a newer design. That got problematic for them so the second was to flash the ABS system to fool the system. No idea how that works so don't ask...me anyway.  

 

This issue was the screen in the pump was very fine and plugged under certain oil maintenance routines. Pump uses oil to create the vacuum. No oil, low/no vacuum. 

 

I've had neither done and at 155K miles brakes are mint BUT I'm an oil maintenance fanatic. Or perhaps lunatic...I forget.

 

Replacement pump has a 'looser' screen and a slightly different impeller design that needs less oil and gets more oil. IF mine ever gives up I'll replace it with the newer style. 

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, mikeyk101 said:

Did you buy the truck used? If so, the previous owner took care of the initial recall. That would be why there are no recalls listed. As far as the recall, it was just flashing the software to update the pump operation with the false hope that this would solve the problem. In my case, the problem actually happened after the software flash. The Specual Coverage isn't a recall per se but is offering extended coverage to that component in case of a failure. The dealership won't do any fixes unless there is a problem. But if the problem happens, you should be GTG.

 

2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

There were two recalls. The original was to replace the pump with a newer design. That got problematic for them so the second was to flash the ABS system to fool the system. No idea how that works so don't ask...me anyway.  

 

This issue was the screen in the pump was very fine and plugged under certain oil maintenance routines. Pump uses oil to create the vacuum. No oil, low/no vacuum. 

 

I've had neither done and at 155K miles brakes are mint BUT I'm an oil maintenance fanatic. Or perhaps lunatic...I forget.

 

Replacement pump has a 'looser' screen and a slightly different impeller design that needs less oil and gets more oil. IF mine ever gives up I'll replace it with the newer style. 

 

 

I am original owner and you both are right.  I forgot that this was taken to the shop before.  I spoke with the local dealer and turns out that my truck was serviced for it back in Sept 2019 with a software flash. They won't check for free, I have to pay a $150 diagnostic fee, but will not be charged it if problem is there.  I'm definitely feeling symptoms of this problem so it should be covered under the service bulletin.  It'll be in the shop next week.   Also, thanks for the more detailed explanation of what the issue could be from.  My truck only has 65k.  

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/8/2022 at 5:32 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

This issue was the screen in the pump was very fine and plugged under certain oil maintenance routines. Pump uses oil to create the vacuum. No oil, low/no vacuum. 

 

 

 

 

so can one get away with gutting the screen completly?

Posted

 

On 6/8/2022 at 10:40 AM, Robopie said:

 

 

 

I am original owner and you both are right.  I forgot that this was taken to the shop before.  I spoke with the local dealer and turns out that my truck was serviced for it back in Sept 2019 with a software flash. They won't check for free, I have to pay a $150 diagnostic fee, but will not be charged it if problem is there.  I'm definitely feeling symptoms of this problem so it should be covered under the service bulletin.  It'll be in the shop next week.   Also, thanks for the more detailed explanation of what the issue could be from.  My truck only has 65k.  

 

 

The pump TSB tells the Tech to look for engine oil in the vacuum line.  If no oil is found they should replace the pump, if oil is found they are supposed to replace the pump and associated parts.  I attached a copy of that PIT, as well as the Recall about reprogramming the ECBM (there may be a later revisions of both).

PIT5361D Brake Pump.pdf RCSB-19V645-6988 Brake Effort.pdf

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, sk said:

 

 

The pump TSB tells the Tech to look for engine oil in the vacuum line.  If no oil is found they should replace the pump, if oil is found they are supposed to replace the pump and associated parts.  I attached a copy of that PIT, as well as the Recall about reprogramming the ECBM (there may be a later revisions of both).

PIT5361D Brake Pump.pdf 102.06 kB · 0 downloads RCSB-19V645-6988 Brake Effort.pdf 238.13 kB · 0 downloads

 

Is there a way for me to check for myself before I drop it off?  

Posted
18 hours ago, pokismoki said:

so can one get away with gutting the screen completly?

 

Screen is a filter of sorts, right? Filter keeps debris from scoring the sealing area. Better idea is perhaps to use the newer pump IF your having issues and preventatively, change oil a bit more often. The debris collected in the screen are degradation products and less so wear metals. 

 

Every motor on earth operates in a unique environment if you think about it. The owner/operator makes this true. So generic OCI recommendations and OLM instruments that do not SAMPLE oil are based on a MEDIAN experience that may or may not suit your particular unit. 

 

What's best is based more factually on running a couple of UOA's and spot checking now and again. A second method is just use a really SHORT OCI. 2 to 3K type of short. Does run the risk of masking operational and maintenance issues but it is effective. 

 

You will hear anecdotal evidence from dozens of individuals saying, "I've run XYZ oil on 15K OCI's and never had an issue". They won't be lying. But remember than a MEDIAN is the point where exactly one half of all data points are separated. Half failures, half successes. So in reality such evidence is literally a flip of the coin. 😉 

 

When an OEM sets an OLM value they know that median, look at the distribution of all data and pick a point where they feel they can absorb the pain of warranty work most fiscally efficient. They do not want it to last forever but they do not want to go broke repairing either. 

 

Hope I've given enough information to give you an honest chance at an informed choice. :driving:

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Update for my Sierra - dropped it off at the local Chevy dealer (since my GMC dealer is 1+ hr away).  They diagnosed the issue and are replacing the vacuum pump and belt at no charge for me. 

 

edit: truck is fixed and feels great!

Edited by Robopie
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 9/14/2019 at 10:35 AM, 1SLOW1500 said:

I know all that however that is in the service bulletin. And a reason to check and replace booster. And why there was lawsuit filed on this. The claim was oil from a failed pump destroyed the booster and it was a safety concern.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

I am experiencing this exact scenario.  Do you happen to have any examples I can present to the dealership.  They are replacing the Vacuum Pump for the second time (under the recall warranty, again)  yet, this time my Booster has oil in it and they are charging me to replace the Brake booster and the Master Cylinder.  It obvious this is a cause and effect thing.

Brake Drag --- Booster and Master Cylinder have an internal failure.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/24/2019 at 3:58 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

This is the most useful thing I've heard on this site. Great stuff and THANKS!

 

I'm going to buy the pump out of pocket and pay my shop to install it and leave my ABS alone. Should they pay? Yes! BUT brakes are more important to me than getting my way. All I needed was the TRUTH. Thanks for giving me that. Now...that wasn't so hard, was it?

 

In the end I did nothing and now at over 175K is works flawlessly. Still have the OEM original pump. 

  • 2 years later...
Posted

The dealership "programmed" brake assist problem and it got worse than it was before I took it there...before the reprogramming it only happened every now and then and now its pretty much every time I try to stop a low speeds...I called and told them and they refused to fix it and said they did the re program and that is all they are responsible for...said I could pay the service charge + parts and then they would fix it....

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...