Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Apparently GM engineering does not consider mice a problem when their trucks are engineered.  Some people have said in different forums that mice getting access is not the manufacture's issue to worry about.  You know what I say to that statement...

 

There are two points mice get access.

 

One of the mouse access locations to get into the cab heat/air intake system is the cowl at the bottom of the windshield (2014-18 and maybe other years).  They get in at a gap at either side of the cowl right next to the hood hinges.  This has a wide gap.  Then they go all the way in, to the top of the cabin filter in the vehicle and build their nest. I would suggest filling those cowl gaps with maybe something like a plastic mesh scouring pad cut to size, or something similar.  The issue seem to be when you have the ventilation to 'fresh air', thus the fresh air door is open between the firewall and the heating duct system.  Some have said to put it in 'recirculate' to close that door, but I don't believe it's the owner's duty to have to remember to do that every time they park the vehicle. I like constant fresh air into my vehicles.   Any other suggestions for this are welcome.

 

The other location mice have gained access to the inside of the cab of the vehicle are gaps at the very back corners of the cab at the bottom.  I believe they only can access these if you have step bars, or the side steps.  I have used folded galvanized window screen cut to size and fitted in these gaps.  Never had a problem after that.  They may be drain holes, so don't do anything to tightly plug them.  These gaps have been on GM truck for many years.

 

I hope this helps those with mice problems. 

Posted

Never a mouse. But I have had frogs.

Best way to get rid of them is to add a snake.
For snake issues add mongoose.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)

Every vehicle ever made has ample ways for vermin and pests to enter.  They're right, it's not the manufacturer's problem.  Don't park in a field or in a forest and leave unattended for long periods of time.

 

Add a cat for mice.  Or rat poison.  Or traps.

 

I'd rather have mice problems than tweaker problems, those are far messier and public to deal with properly.

Edited by dukedkt442
Posted

Mesh won't keep out a mouse if it wants in. There's no manufacturing fail here just another owner who is mad about something so they want to blame GM. Guess what they'll climb into the engine bay and eat the wires too.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

we have a beer brewery , which lures the rats , since they store hops and grains outside. might have to pick up an unwanted tom cats off craigslist, put him to work

Edited by flyingfool
  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Lsgun1 said:

Guess what they'll climb into the engine bay and eat the wires too.

Good thing OP didn’t buy a Benz their new “eco” friendly wiring is now made with soy oil instead of petroleum oil. Apparently the little b@st@rds think it’s quite tasty.

 

Last fall brother-in-law got to put a new 5k harness in one of his JD tractors in the field cause apparently JD has adopted this practice as well. Cause you would never expect to find critters around farms, barns, storage buildings, corn fields, etc...

Posted
1 hour ago, wforrest08 said:

Good thing OP didn’t buy a Benz their new “eco” friendly wiring is now made with soy oil instead of petroleum oil. Apparently the little b@st@rds think it’s quite tasty.

 

Last fall brother-in-law got to put a new 5k harness in one of his JD tractors in the field cause apparently JD has adopted this practice as well. Cause you would never expect to find critters around farms, barns, storage buildings, corn fields, etc...

i've noticed this on all German cars, the rubber and plastics are all eco-friendly , so after 8 years the cars begin to crumble into dust, haha  oh but the machining on the crankshaft is a work of engineering art!

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, flyingfool said:

i've noticed this on all German cars, the rubber and plastics are all eco-friendly , so after 8 years the cars begin to crumble into dust, haha  oh but the machining on the crankshaft is a work of engineering art!

I’ve heard rumors of this but mine must be the outliers.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Sounds like we have a lot of inner city people responding where there are only rat problems and are too big to get into the vehicles...lol.   What I ended up doing was removing the plastic cowl, taking fiber-type window screen, rolling it up not really tight, drilling some small holes, and ty-rapping to the ends of the cowl.  You have to study the setup to determine length to use.

 

And , really, there are not a 'lot' of places where mice can get into a vehicle.  Only a few that could be remedied by the manufacturer during their engineering process, and very easily.  With the plastic cowl, they could make the end of it so that it goes all the way down to the body sheet metal.  Maybe 1" x 5" or less on either side.  And make the gap at the rear corners of the body just wide enough for water to drain and not HUGE enough for mice to get in.  Both pretty simple if engineers use their heads. 

 

This posting was really meant to help those that do unfortunately have mice in their vehicles and are looking for the access points...do we want to go down a road where we could say that everything can fail and the manufacturer should have no responsibilities for anything?

Posted

Never leave anything eatable in the cab.

Use metal wire mesh with 1/4 inch holes. Available most hardware's.

Been there.

 

:)

Posted
On 9/21/2019 at 6:08 AM, jbugj said:

This posting was really meant to help those that do unfortunately have mice in their vehicles and are looking for the access points...do we want to go down a road where we could say that everything can fail and the manufacturer should have no responsibilities for anything?

I've also faced the mouse and rat issue in my homes and vehicles in the past.  Most recently I've faced this issue with visitors enjoying the warmth of my engine area.  I definitely don't expect GM to assume any responsibility for my mouse problem nor do I believe this leads to any lack of accountability for other design/engineering problems.  It's a nasty problem to have and hopefully you'll find a solution soon. I found that parking in a different area has rendered my truck as a less desirable destination.  As suggested earlier, I also strive to keep any attractants out of my vehicle.   It seems once they discover a secluded resort, they keep coming back!

Posted

Those saying GM has no responsibility have kind of been shut down by GM...I looked at a 2018 model and I see GM has fixed the problem of the gaps at the end of the cowls.  Apparently they do feel it is their responsibility to some degree to make them mouse proof. 

 

And it is not food being left in the vehicles either.  They enter as in my case when there is no food, they bring their own. They are looking for safe dry places to build their nests...

Posted

I'm sure GM must have realized that if mice are getting access to a vehicle, and one runs around in the vehicle while a mouse-phobic person is driving down a freeway at 80 mph, that would be a huge concern legally for GM...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 433 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...